Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon POLL : What did you think of CSI: Cyber - Kidnapping 2.0?


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

POLL : What did you think of CSI: Cyber - Kidnapping 2.0?

Mar 5, 2015

Share on Reddit

35 comments:

  1. Jonathan CarpenterMarch 5, 2015 at 4:06 AM

    Patricia Arquette is a great lead, James Van Der Beek is good too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. wanted to try it, but if i did i would be betraying Stalker

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoy it great episode it was light more like Scorpion then CSI in my opinion I hope it does well in rating but I don't want it to replace Stalkers it can be a great mid season show when Stalkers on hitaus

    ReplyDelete
  4. i don't want to betray Stalker

    ReplyDelete
  5. You wouldn't be betraying Stalker in any way...why would you think so?

    ReplyDelete
  6. by watching something in its time-slot when it wasn't its mid-seasn or seaon finale

    ReplyDelete
  7. worst pilot I have seen in a longtime.

    ReplyDelete
  8. PA is worth watching - she has the ability to balance strong/sensitive without seeming too rough or too mushy. The story wasn't great - at all - but I thought they did a good job of introducing the team and the premise. Like NY & Miami, both of which took several episodes to get their groove (Kim Delaney, anyone? NYC shown as dark and creepy, etc.), hopefully the show will find its tone. CBS must have faith in it since they changed it from Sunday to Wed. Plus, CBS really needs more shows with female leads. And, despite the Stalker boycott group - either BC or Cyber was going to replace it. I wanted Stalker to work, but it didn't and CBS gave it plenty of airings, but the ratings just weren't there.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Oh, come on! Isn't that a little melodramatic?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Voted Great!... James Van Der Beek was surprisingly good considering I've not really liked anything else he's done and would have voted Awesome if it weren't for Patricia Arquette - she acts the same in every role, seemingly from the David Caruso school of acting with meaningful pauses and dramatic lines read like she's reading a shopping list - can't stand her!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Stalker hasn't been renewed yet... if ratings for something in the same timeslot are too good... it could tip the scales on the decision.

    ReplyDelete
  12. And people not watching Cyber to help (or in other words to not betray) Stalker won't have any effect. since they don't have a Nielsen box.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Have to disagree... Patricia Arquette is everything wrong with this show. It was still great but I can think of a dozen actresses just off the top of my head who would have made this far better show than with Patricia Arquette in it. James Van Der Beek was surprisingly good though and I did like the other supporting cast members.

    ReplyDelete
  14. + Stalker is 100% getting canceled. Unless those last 3 episodes get 1.8-2.0's

    ReplyDelete
  15. Exactly. I don't know why some Stalker fans think that if Cyber fails, then CBS will renew Stalker.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think this is more of an emotional thing, like if someone wanna cheat on their girlfriend with whom you are in a long distance relationship, even though they know that there is no way she'll find it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. i liked the show, but i think it was lacking the CSI part if you go back to all the others it was missing that signiture i think

    ReplyDelete
  18. Honestly I don't think it's going to have an impact on Stalker's fate... Stalker is quite dead...


    And honestly I don't see CSI Cyber being renewed too... Just my opinion...

    ReplyDelete
  19. I'm just so shocked they let a BABY drown, luckily Avery revived him by CPR but still. A child, man, woman or elderly, ok, but the most smallest of humans? I tweeted how dare you cbs, but that's just how emotional I got from that. Other than that, LOVED this episode and the new CSI cast.

    ReplyDelete
  20. LOL bad analogy Babar :P I would think it's still a bad thing even if she doesn't find out!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Love Van Der Beek, I forgot he's in it! Better check it out

    ReplyDelete
  22. Okay, think about it like this. Your girlfriend has moved away recently but you guys haven't really broken up. You know their is no chance this relationship will work, but she continues to string you along. Then a new girl comes along who you like and want to be with. What do you do?

    ReplyDelete
  23. It's great for me as IT Guy. The writer do a research and write a storyline quit well about steps and a work in IT and Digital Forensic but the writer should add more action, Physical Forensic (Blood,Poison,Chemistry and Weapon) to let non-IT people enjoy to watch this series. It's not enough to change some command that use in IT to be a common word such as replicate or release which I laugh when see those words since there is not any command that is written and represent a function of them obviously. Normally, there is some letter missing for each word that use in writing a code.

    For a cast of this shows, I still don't judge how good or bad they act right now. I will see a couple next episodes to let me a characteristic of each character first. PA may act like that in this show because the characteristic or profile of her character.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I totally agree with you.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Sorry. Difficult analogy to sell. (Actually I don't think you can sell it as okay.) If you realize a relationship isn't going to work...just make the phone call before you start the new relationship.


    I started typing this hoping I could think of an analogy that would work in this situation but I can't.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Break up with her first.

    But yeah, I literally meant bad analogy because it doesn't fit with your argument that it's not a betrayal of Stalker. This hypothetical situation would be a betrayal of trust, even if the 'girlfriend' doesn't know.

    Anyway this is getting off-topic. I understand the not watching CSI thing. I never let myself get into Miami and NY because I loved the original too much. And it really bugged me that all my friends watched Miami and none of them even knew about the original!! Plus I actually do hate Miami, too bright and bad acting.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I like this! I feel like that sometimes with shows.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I'm was assuming the person who first mentioned not wanting to watch as it'd be betrayal actually has a Nielsen box and that anyone else who does I hope thinks carefully about what they watch (probably not given some of the shows that rate really well). ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  29. It was alright. The crime itself was interesting, but it just felt like they were trying too hard to make the show look sleek. Also I wish they had spent more time introducing Agent Ryan's team because I didn't really get a feel for who they are or why they're on the team.

    ReplyDelete
  30. This was a strictly average pilot imo. Actors were all good did their parts. Babies were cute and the case was overall good. But there was nothing special about this show. Nothing that stood out. Some scenes were cliche too. They black guy cracking the long password by arranging the dates in ascending order. Seriously you need a specialist for that? At least make it into a puzzle so that we will feel he is special enough to join the team. I will give the show a chance and see if the characters evolve and become more interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  31. This pilot ep was on the low end of okay.

    ReplyDelete
  32. this show was hilarious. if you know even a drop about computers, IT or CS you can't help but laugh, cringe and vomit a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I don't think we should be so quick to judge. Beauty and The Beast was also going to be "100%" cancelled, but it was renewed for a third and fourth season. I still have hope.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.