Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Castle - Episode 7.13 - I, Witness - Sneak Peek
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Castle - Episode 7.13 - I, Witness - Sneak Peek

29 Jan 2015

Share on Reddit

-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

28 comments:

  1. Jen29 January 2015 at 19:01

    I can't wait for this. Roll on Monday.☺

    ReplyDelete
  2. Elhar29 January 2015 at 19:27

    Castle, there is a little thingy, called phone, you know? :(
    Why do they need to write stories which are based on making the characters idiot? I can't forget the ep when they were not able to call 911 because the phone was locked ... :((

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wesley gotje29 January 2015 at 19:27

    Looking good looking very very good, i like where this is going so happy with the writing this season compared to S5 and S6.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Someone who cares29 January 2015 at 20:27

    There's also a little thing called suspension of disbelief. It works wonders when you watch crime shows.
    I wouldn't think of Castle as an idiot because he didn't call 911. Not everyone thinks of that when they hear a horrified scream, with their adrenaline pumping. Also, you can't get a signal everywhere and the house seemed pretty isolated.
    As for the other episode, they had purposely removed the emergency call button from the phone to make the story possible. Like I said, suspension of disbelief.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kathrin29 January 2015 at 20:27

    Man, now all I can think about is how do Kate and the guys find him?!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Maria Ferreira29 January 2015 at 20:30

    And all I can think of is there´s some kind of woods, will Castle have a flashback to when he disappeared?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kathrin29 January 2015 at 20:34

    Oh, now that's a thought! Interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  8. bj29 January 2015 at 20:37

    I hope he called the police on the way.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bruce_F29 January 2015 at 20:40

    Come on, Castle. Whaddaya doin'? First you don't call this in when you get in your car and then you start putting your finger prints all over the vehicle you followed?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Elhar29 January 2015 at 20:51

    Don't blame him, he has never been around cops. maybe if he could have done some PI course he could have learned how not to destroy traces. Oh wait...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Bruce_F29 January 2015 at 20:58

    That's some graduate-level sarcasm right there. Bravo, my friend.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Elhar29 January 2015 at 21:16

    Suspend your disbelief is saved for technical discrepancies. Like when Lanie/Perlmutter works as a one man CSI unit, when people are shooting a truckload of ammo at each other without any hit or harm, or (of course) the core concept of a writer is allowed to to participate in investigations like Castle do.

    Suspend your disbelief has never been an excuse of bad plot cornerstones. The example you wrote is the shining example of it: you can't have a phone without an emergency button, period. It's simply bad writing when the plot turns on this. They hope that the audience will sleep anyhow or will be numb/dumb enough to not care about it is an insult, beacuse making a plausible story is their job.

    Of course it isn't applied to fandoms, who praise everything as the Holy Grail, regardless of its value. (Funny thing though that LATER on it comes back that certain episodes were really sh*t, even according to the biggest fans.)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Wesley gotje29 January 2015 at 21:26

    Same old Same old.

    ReplyDelete
  14. phnxgrl29 January 2015 at 22:26

    Well Stupid Castle is your Name!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anneliese30 January 2015 at 06:27

    oh Castle, how stupid and silly you are! Alone on the way, when will you ever learn?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Noelle Lynn30 January 2015 at 12:24

    I cant wait either. Castle is NOT stupid. How many of you have been in a situation where you aren't thinking straight at the moment? Does that make you stupid as you make Castle out to be? Think about it.

    The writers are making the storyline suspenseful and they deserve credit not criticism. If the crititcs here have better ideas, then submit them.

    This is a fan site, not a critics site. True fans stand by their shows, not tear their show down bit by bit.

    ReplyDelete
  17. canesgirl30 January 2015 at 23:26

    Why do you bother watching this show? I enjoy the shows I enjoy for entertainment, not so I can analyze each detail.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Elhar31 January 2015 at 07:26

    I apologize, I'm from those backward places on the Earth where people beleive that a badly written plot seriously hamper the show and exactly the details are which make it enjoyable. (Oh, and I'm honored that you felt my opinion important enough for your first ever comment.)

    ReplyDelete
  19. Elhar31 January 2015 at 11:27

    As far as I have seen yet, spoilertv is NOT a fan site, has never been. That sometime fandom members try to silence the other opinions - well, it tells more about the fans than about the criticism.

    ReplyDelete
  20. bekcsi31 January 2015 at 12:09

    Why do I think that this isn't going to end like a birthday party? O.o

    ReplyDelete
  21. Wesley gotje31 January 2015 at 15:27

    Maybe people should consider that 1) this sp is cut like hell 2) Who knows he did call beckett and tell her where he is going or whatever, my god we didnt even get a full episode yet and already people play the "Castle is being a idiot" card.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Elhar31 January 2015 at 16:10

    Blame the ABC PR Dept. The sneak peeks are about to give a feeling about the episode. That's the impression what it gave. If it's a false one, the error is not at the receiving end.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Wesley gotje31 January 2015 at 16:59

    Or blame no1 and be patient before jumping to conclusions.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Wesley gotje31 January 2015 at 17:26

    I just say it like it is not making up excuses. also i for 1 check sp's for the content not the context otherwise there is no point in checking it.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Elhar31 January 2015 at 17:27

    First rule of sneakpeekers is don't watch any sneak peeks if you are afraid of having conclusions.


    That somebody prefers fabricating excuses just because the conclusion would not be favourable, be it. Not my cup of tea, but I don't ask anybody not to do it either.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Noelle Lynn31 January 2015 at 17:40

    Agreed Wesley.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Noelle Lynn31 January 2015 at 17:42

    Doesnt that speak to you?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Noelle Lynn31 January 2015 at 17:42

    Yes because I am a fan, not a critic.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.