Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon 12 Monkeys - Pilot - Review


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

12 Monkeys - Pilot - Review

18 Jan 2015

Share on Reddit


12 Monkeys premiered this week with the “Pilot” written by series creators Terry Matalas and Travis Fickett and directed by Jeffrey Reiner. Fickett and Matalas also worked together on Nikita and Terra Nova. The series is loosely based on the 1995 movie of the same name by Terry Gilliam, starring Brad Pitt and Bruce Willis, and the movie was based on Chris Marker’s 1962 short film La Jetee. Natalie Chaidez will be the series showrunner, and her credits include In Plain Sight, V, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, and Heroes. Reiner also directed Pilots for Helix, Trauma, and Caprica. A lot of experience was brought to bear on this episode and it shows.

        This first episode contained a lot of necessarily exposition, but still kept the action moving, establishing a gritty universe and characters we want to root for. Stars Aaron Stanford (James Cole) and Amanda Schull (Dr Cassandra Railly) deliver excellent performances. My only regret is that guest star Zeljko Ivanek isn’t likely to be back anytime soon. As usual, Ivanek delivers a fabulous performance as Leland Goines.

The show is interestingly and intricately structured, yet it’s easy to follow. The entire cast is good, including the guest cast. The special effects are well done. I especially like the lighting effects. I am curious to see how they are going to maintain the separate timeline story arcs though. Due to the amount of exposition this episode, I thought a rather re-cappy review might be helpful.

As you might expect with a time travel series, there are quite a few jumps even in this first episode. We begin in 2043 with Cole’s voiceover. He and Ramses (Kirk Acevedo) are moving through an empty, desolate landscape. They take a watch off a skeleton in a destroyed CDC Headquarters as we’re told that he’s lost everything and done terrible things. He tells us they are trying to hit a re-set switch. Later in the episode, we learn that a plague in 2017 wiped out 7 billion people and that the virus has continued to mutate, meaning that in another generation, humans will be wiped out entirely. We also learn that after the initial plague, civilization essentially broke down and a lot of people went underground. When things settled down, the scientists reemerged and came up with a plan to travel back in time and stop the plague before it started.

Dr Jones (Barbara Sukowa) finds Cole in jail – we don’t know what he did to end up in a cell – and offers him a mission. She chooses him because of a recording that Cassandra left in the past when holed up in the CDC, looking for a cure. The message is degraded and garbled, but she named Leland Frost as the one who started the plague and the message ends with her saying Cole’s name. Jones injects Cole to alter his cellular structure to allow him to “splinter” or time travel. We’re told it’s very painful. Jones tells him, “Time is different for you now. Everyone else is bound by time. Not you. Not even the paradox can hold you back.”

They have a wall of clues but don’t know what they mean. Cassandra’s picture is on the wall, but Jones cautions Cole: “She’s not your mission. She’s just a puzzle piece. Remember your mission. Everything else is secondary. Everyone you see is already dead.” And then they send him back in time. Unfortunately, it’s not a terribly precise process.

We first see Cole in 2013. He kidnaps Cassandra just after she’s made a presentation to a group of other virologists. She’s in a relationship with Aaron Marker (Noah Bean) who’s in politics. It’s taken Cole almost all the time allotted to him in his jump to find her. How much time he gets and what determines that is not addressed in the episode, but I’m sure they’ll get around to telling us eventually. By coming too early, she doesn’t work at the CDC, and she has no idea who Leland Frost is.

The watch we see in the very first scene is pregnant with importance. It’s symbolic of the shortage of time – in Cole’s jumps, to the end of the world. It’s also an important touchstone between times – past, present, and future. It’s how Cole is able to begin to convince Cassandra that he is from another time. I thought the effect when he scratched the present watch and it showed up simultaneously on the future watch was really well done. And of course, the watch ends up at the center of the paradox in the climactic scene.

When Cole places the two watches close together, they create a paradox – which Jones has already said won’t affect Cole. When Cassandra wants Cole to jump back to stop them coming to the party where they’re captured, Cole tells her it’s dangerous for more than one version of yourself to be in the same place – it creates a paradox. Cole tells her a paradox happens “when something comes back in time and comes in contact with itself. Mother Nature doesn’t like it when you rearrange her furniture.” Given the explosion caused by the watches, I shudder to think what would happen with people! This is also a pretty common trope of time travel – one person can’t have two versions of him or herself at the same time.

When Cole returns in 2015, Cassandra’s life has fallen apart. No one, including Aaron, believed her story that Cole was a time traveler – or that he just disappeared. She’s lost her job and her boyfriend. But she doesn’t locate Leland Frost until she goes to see her father’s friend Jeremy (Robert Wisdom) who used to work for the NSA. I love Wisdom, so I hope we’ll see him again in future episodes. He’s discovered a Leland Goines who is CEO of the Markridge Corporation, who are publicly working on a malaria vaccine, but who are really working on bioweapons and other less savory and more secret projects. Goines security designation is Frost.

Cole and Cassandra crash a fundraiser. Cole is determined to kill Frost before he can unleash the virus. Cole justifies it to both himself and Cassandra by repeating that everyone is dead already anyway. A convenient excuse from anyone coming back from the furture! Cassandra asks how they’ll know when the future is changed and Cole tells her they’ll know because he’ll be erased. She’s worried that means he’ll be dead, but he tells her it just means he’ll be a different person. Of course, this all has to be speculation because he’s never done this before!

Cassandra is introduced to Leland and his protégé Oliver (Ramon De Ocampo) who he tells her is a “rock star” scientist. We learn that Oliver studies viruses and their bio-chemical applications. When Cole enters the room, Leland clearly recognizes him. Cassandra gets cold feet and blows their cover to prevent Cole from killing Leland. Of course, after meeting Oliver, she’s got to be concerned that it might not be Leland who starts the plague after all.

Leland takes them from the police. He did recognize Cole from having met him in 1987 – a trip to the past that Cole hasn’t taken yet! Love the way the show plays with time. Leland has Cole sedated and Oliver examines him, discovering that Cole’s brains activity looks like a grand mal seizure without the chaos or damage to the brain and his adrenal gland is working in overdrive. Oliver tells Leland that Cole is a flesh and blood molecular computer – he’s the product of scientific advancements that are 20 years ahead of them – thus providing further proof of time travel. I have to wonder what all this is doing to Cole’s actual body though. Or is he, in fact, just a computer?

Leland decides he’s going to cut Cole up to figure out what makes him tick. Ivanek is simply fantastic. He’s so good at being evil, even while also being curious and seemingly reasonable! He wants to know “What did I do that was so monumental that the laws of physics were broke?” Hopefully, we’ll be getting that flashback to 1987, but from 2015 onward, we know he’s dead. I loved his long monologue. He does still provide Cole with the next clue that he needs, however. Leland tells Cole that in 1987 he was asking about the army of the 12 monkeys.

The episode ends with Cole splintering back to 2043 and telling Cassandra to go into hiding. We also see that Leland had a daughter Jennifer (Emily Hampshire), who would appear to be a patient at JD Peoples Psychiatric Treatment Center. Leland has left his fortune and company to her for her to continue his work. As the camera pans out from her, we see that she’s been drawing a giant monkey’s head on the wall – the monkey’s head seen in the graffiti in the clippings on the clue wall in 2043.
I wanted to recap the episode because it was so heavy on exposition. There’s a really nice contrast between the scenes in the present – which seem quite ordinary in lighting etc and the scenes in the future which are much darker and colder. Cole complains about having a hard time finding Cassandra in 2013 because there are too many people. These elements also come up in the character interactions. Cole is clearly ravenous and is really quite lacking in any social graces. There is very little food in the future and no time for social niceties. I loved him eyeing the nuts at Jeremy’s and asking Cassandra if he could eat some and then the relish with which he ate his cheeseburger in the car.

When they get to the party, Cassandra tells Cole that he looks nice. He’s not sure how he’s supposed to respond to that, but he tells her that she looks like one of the women in an old magazine. Clearly, in the future, they don’t have much occasion, opportunity or ability to dress up. She teases him about what “kind” of magazines. Tellingly, however, when he does come up with a compliment, it’s that she looks “clean.” Clean would be a luxury not afforded many in the future. In contrast, Aaron tells Cassandra that she looks good and then amends it to great.

I loved when Aaron asked them how they met and they are both like deer in the headlights of an oncoming car. Finally, Cole simply bursts out that Cassandra bought him a cheeseburger. Stanford does a great job with the subtle and understated humor. He also does a great job straddling the line with Cole of someone who is clearly hardened from his life experiences in a harsh environment, but who can still find some wonder in the past.

I’m curious to see how they are going to get Cassandra back on track. Schull does a great job showing how Cole has impacted on Cassandra. Even though her life has clearly taken a bad turn, she’s still a strong, smart and competent doctor.

I loved the paradox sequence. Cole bests Leland by appealing to Leland’s obvious curiosity. He gets him mesmerized by the watches freaking out. Then just as Jones said, while everyone else is caught in the paradox, it can’t hold Cole and he grabs Cassandra and runs out of the room, leaving the others apparently caught in slow motion and the blast from the watches. It was a nice touch – however far-fetched for Cole to find Cassandra’s watch in the rubble and give it back to her.

I thought this was a great start to the series. I’m still really curious to see how they continue to weave both timelines together. What did you think of the episode? Are you hooked? Were you a fan of the movie, and if so, did the “Pilot” live up to your expectations? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below!

About the Author - Lisa Macklem
I do interviews and write articles for the site in addition to reviewing a number of shows, including Supernatural, Arrow, Agents of Shield, The Walking Dead, Game of Thrones, Forever, Defiance, Bitten, Glee, and a few others! Highlights of this past year include covering San Diego Comic Con as press and a set visit to Bitten. When I'm not writing about television shows, I'm often writing about entertainment and media law in my capacity as a legal scholar. I also work in theatre when the opportunity arises. I'm an avid runner and rider, currently training in dressage.

55 comments:

  1. So far, this show holds promise and potential and I'll continue to watch it. The fact that its main premise is centered around time travel and that it has Birkhoff from Nikita are what drew me to the show. 12 Monkeys is definitely a marked improvement on Sci-Fi's (I still refuse to call it SyFy) programming slate.

    ReplyDelete
  2. To be completely honest,It was a good pilot but wasn't great like some of the fall pilots this year-RBS,Forever,HTGAWM,The Flash & recently premiered Eye Candy.I have not seen the movie so i had no prior expectations.The pilot was confusing for me with all their time travel shenanigans but promising & intriguing enough for me to give the 2nd episode a chance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. For a pilot, it was okay. It did a very good job of setting up the series. But I liked the second ep better. I kind of wish they had done a two hour premiere. I'm happy with the cast, although, I keep thinking I'm watching Nicole Kidman and not Amanda. They are so similar it's amazing. I like Cole and Cassie as a team. I also like Jones. And as far as the story goes, it does have me hooked. I'm very curious as to what the twist will be on Cassie's original message. We've only heard a very garbled version of it. It will be interesting if they throw in a huge twist on it where she's actually telling Cole not to travel back through time or something. I'm definitely going to keep watching this show.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really enjoyed it - loved it. It was a great start. It was a lot more interesting than most Pilots (usually shows improve from the Pilot). So if 12 Monkeys also improves from the Pilot it will be an awesome show.


    From what I saw in the Pilot it might be one of those shows I'll like every turn it takes. While I'm not quite invested in it yet to call it a favorite show, I see the potential for it to be. If I both love every turn and become a fan, that would be amazing. I tend to nic pick at my favorite shows. It would be nice to have a favorite without glaring flaws.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I watched for the same reasons. Aaron and time travel.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like the movie, and I think this show is doing justice to the story, actually I think I like better this Cole than the one from the movie, not because Bruce Willis hadn't made a great job, but because this Cole seems to be a little bit more coherent or aware of the things he's doing, I'm not so sure about the girl who plays the character Brad Pitt plays in the movie, because now she is not exactly crazy as Pitt's character, anyway, I'll keep watching it might be a little bit early yet, but I think it could become one of my favorite shows.

    ReplyDelete
  7. wait 'till you see the second episode LOL

    ReplyDelete
  8. same here and Noah Bean and Kirk Acevedo of Fringe

    ReplyDelete
  9. you mean she's scared for Cole if he travels back in time?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Great Review! But it is Zeljko Ivanek not Seljko!

    ReplyDelete
  11. What if it's like the Butterfly Effect and Cole going back in time actually causes the virus to be released? Maybe that's the paradox.

    ReplyDelete
  12. arghh!!!! that damn Butterfly Effect, that'd be very horrifying but that would be very hopeless though don't you think and in this show they can actually change the future, and isn't The Butterfly Effect, i mean once you cause it it can't be stopped?

    ReplyDelete
  13. i know she creeped ME out

    ReplyDelete
  14. I might've chuckled at seeing Aaron and Cole shake hands. So different from their characters' relationship on Nikita.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Well, with the Butterfly Effect, you could change stuff, but you kept ending up in alternate realities. This show is kind of going by its own rules. Like he just killed Leland, and we don't know what doing that effects his own timeline. If they even show us if something changes in Cole's timeline. But I'm pretty sure Cassie's message will be something we won't expect.

    ReplyDelete
  16. but when she said "Please Cole" that sounded more emotional than plot-like and it felt finished to me at least that part felt finished, it IS confusing though, i don't know if you watch Continuum but on that show a time travelers grandmother was killed and he didn't cease to exist i know it's different here but it made me think

    ReplyDelete
  17. definitely heh, i mean we are not seeing Seymour Birkhoff or Ryan "Fletch Lives" Fletcher are we? LOL

    ReplyDelete
  18. I liked the show better than the movie and I really liked the movie. I loved Aaron Stanford on Nikita so was excited to see him in this series and was not disappointed.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I wonder why they changed Dr. Railly's name.

    ReplyDelete
  20. what do you mean? it's not Cassandra in the movie?

    ReplyDelete
  21. The show is definitely concrete evidence - so far! - to the network's commitment to better genre programming.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Forever is a really interesting comparison as it also deals with time travel in a sense - but for a very different effect.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I'll be screening the second episode today. I was wondering the same thing about her message - and as you note below, maybe she's telling him please don't come back because it's the time travel that starts it...

    ReplyDelete
  24. I thought they packed a lot into the Pilot and yet I still had lots of intriguing questions. Time travel is so hard to do that I fear it may be an impossible task not to stretch our imagination at some point. But I think a lot of that will have to do with whether you have any strong opinions about time travel stories - my husband loves them, so he's always nit picking time travel shows apart. So far nothing on 12 Monkeys though! I'm always interested to see how the writing team rolls out.

    ReplyDelete
  25. That's really interesting! Thanks for weighing in with some opinions based on the movie. I wonder if Jennifer and Cassandra are both supposed to be the Brad Pitt character? I interviewed both Stanford and Schull prior to the premiere and Stanford was very conscious of what a great role this had been for Willis.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Nope, it's Kathryn.

    ReplyDelete
  27. TYPO! Thanks for pointing that out - I'll fix it. And awful because I DO love him!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Good to know! I think the concept really lends itself to television which has more scope to really flesh out the story. It's nice to see Aaron has so many fans that followed him from Nikita! I have to admit that I didn't watch it....

    ReplyDelete
  29. I never watched the movie so this was all brand new for me and I loved it. I thought it was fast paced even with all of the back story they had to tell. It had suspense and action, and all of the actors did a great job. I'm in for the finish.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I know! It happens ;-) Most likely cause of the way it's pronounced. I'm a Serb so I know slavic names otherwise probably wouldn't even notice it either. ^_^.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Nope. It was totally a typo. And I always have IMDb open so that I don't get people's names misspelled! Plus, I also reviewed Revolution... But, again, thanks for pointing that out - should he ever read the article himself, that would have been mortifying!

    ReplyDelete
  32. Awesome! I've been meaning and meaning to watch the movie - it's been sitting on our shelf for years, but I didn't want to bring that with me to watching the show... I'm excited to see the ratings!

    ReplyDelete
  33. hahahahaha. He'll write you an angry letter ! LMAO.

    Don't worry if he reads it the typo won't be an issue at all. You really did him a favor here , as said great review. ^_^

    ReplyDelete
  34. You should watch the movie just to see how different it is from the show. It has a totally different feel to it. The show actually has a fresher, more exciting feel, whereas, the movie was darker, more bleak. They really are two completely separate versions of the story. And they both stand up well. I really liked the movie. But I think I like the show better.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I'll get to it one of these days... So much to watch!

    ReplyDelete
  36. I already watched the 2nd. episode, (IT WAS GREAT), and that's why I'm saying that she's not exactly crazy, she's traumatized for the things she went through. In the movie, Pitt was totally nuts for no reason, he was an "idealist" who defended the animal's rights and hated his father, because he had labs that experimented with animals, and supposedly that's the reason why he organized a movement with a bunch of idealistic kids, but Pitt wasn't really concerned about the animals, he only wanted to make noise and bother his father, he was a crazy rich kid with a mental disorder, and that was very funny, and in the end of the day these kids did nothing, they didn't spread the virus. Here in the show, seems like this girl will have a major role in the problem, because she's an actual victim of the bad guys. that's why I'm not so convinced of her as character not the actress' performance, she did great, but the thing is that after seeing what happened to her I can't blame her for losing it, but maybe she will be an ally to Cole more than an "enemy", we'll see.

    ReplyDelete
  37. But she does have a pre-existing mental condition - she says she started hearing voices when she turned 13 and was put under treatment then - long before going to work for her dad... that said, she could still be very different from Pitt's character (and I haven't seen the movie... yet....) ;)

    ReplyDelete
  38. Thank you, I'm not sure, because it's hard to say what the show will be about, in only 2 episodes, but if you pay attention to something as simple as the clothes, you can tell that the show is making some tribute to the characters in the movie or maybe even linking them to the ones in the show with those details, like Pitt and Hampshire's jackets, they look very similar, so from my perception Jennifer is who plays now Pitt's character, and Cassandra would be the Dr. Kathryn Railly.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Yeah you should watch it, it's a good movie, then you would see what I mean, even if she was really schizophrenic, (who knows, somebody is paying her doctor, to keep her quiet) if she was once controlled as we saw she was, then I don't see why she's still there after 2 years.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Hmmm. That does sound really interesting. I'll definitely try to find time sooner rather than later!

    ReplyDelete
  41. I think the Doctor is definitely the key...

    ReplyDelete
  42. Do you remember the topic of Dr. Railly's conference in the movie??, well, it was about Cassandra's Syndrome, the woman from the Greek mythology who was able to predict the future, but that was also cursed because nobody would ever believe her... hehe do you see the conexion now??, I see this as another reference of the movie, and it fits perfectly because that's exactly what happens to the character now. She's the Cassandra of the "present" in all aspects.

    ReplyDelete
  43. At this point, The CW is better at being Sci Fi than Sci Fi itself however 12 Monkeys is a step in the right direction.

    ReplyDelete
  44. yeah that's what they want let's hope they stick with it and you didn't put Syfy?

    ReplyDelete
  45. how sucky would that be?

    ReplyDelete
  46. and Continuum, if you watch it?

    ReplyDelete
  47. for real? why not? it wasn't just Aaron that was on Nikita it was also Noah Bean he plays Marker and Amanda hers was a guest spot but a great one

    ReplyDelete
  48. what do you mean curse? it's more like sad that no one believed her

    ReplyDelete
  49. You don't know who Cassandra was?

    ReplyDelete
  50. I know, but I don't know why they chose to change just her name lol. I'm not complaining or anything, I was just curious.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I'll refer you to the second last line of the very first comment up top.

    ReplyDelete
  52. ║ ρħέόήίx ║19 January 2015 at 17:32

    I am looking for sci-fi series to watch ,any suggestions

    ReplyDelete
  53. The myth says that Apollo cursed her with that sad... curse hehe ,P

    ReplyDelete
  54. Yeah, it's not a big deal. ;)

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.