Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Glee - Group Cast Promotional Image
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Glee - Group Cast Promotional Image

19 Dec 2014

Share on Reddit


-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

9 comments:

  1. Christopher DeBono19 December 2014 at 10:13

    It looks so weird without Quinn, Mike and Emma.
    They should have brought the actors in quickly on a separate day if they couldn't make the photoshoot and photoshopped them in afterwards.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Emilia Rozanowska19 December 2014 at 10:42

    My guys adore this series, but I don't get it... Like american version of SKINS, this is very kitsch series. And their songs are... No, I can't even listen to them :D I really would like to understan this kind of humour, but I can't evidently. zdrowykregoslup.net.pl

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ron19 December 2014 at 15:22

    No Quinn there. No love!

    ReplyDelete
  4. scarlet0419 December 2014 at 16:46

    Where the hell is Quinn?!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anna Paolinelli19 December 2014 at 18:12

    I would have liked a Unique Update.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Scott Lawrence Jenkins19 December 2014 at 18:30

    It's nice to see a group photo where the cast are actually interacting instead of poorly Photoshopped into a horizontal line and standing with their arms crossed. This is really nice.

    ReplyDelete
  7. David20 December 2014 at 09:27

    Why isn't Dianna, Jayma, and Harry included in the photo. They've photoshopped 4 group shots together, couldn't they have shot The Will/Bieste/Sue group when Jayma was on set? And either had a separate shot of Dianna and Harry, like they've done with Kurt and Tina, or included them in another of the groups? Just seems silly. It's not as though everyone up there is appearing in a regular role, so there's really no good reason for leaving them out.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Alexandre20 December 2014 at 15:32

    Mike, Quinn, Sugar?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Alexandre20 December 2014 at 15:40

    Mike, Quinn, Sugar?

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.