Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Revenge - Episode 3.21 - Impetus - Sneak Peek 2
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Revenge - Episode 3.21 - Impetus - Sneak Peek 2

1 May 2014

Share on Reddit


Source: TVLine
-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

15 comments:

  1. Alexa Nicole1 May 2014 at 18:19

    The way Conrad treats Victoria makes me sick. First you murder her fiance in cold blood and now you dare manhandle her? Can't wait to see Emily take this asshat down.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Emily's Babe1 May 2014 at 19:01

    Can't wait for this! Conrad is going down!

    ReplyDelete
  3. eclt831 May 2014 at 19:47

    You're talking as though Victoria is innocent. She's a killer too. She's hit and scratched Conrad multiple times in the past. Man or woman, no one should be allowed to physically hit another person. Victoria has been very violent to pretty much everyone. Even Charlotte.
    They are in it to their necks, both of them. Victoria framed David just as much as Conrad. Her victim routine is so fake. Emily doesn't buy it, nor should she.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Alexa Nicole1 May 2014 at 20:05

    Most of your points are completely irrelevant to my comment but I'll address them anyway.


    What the fck does Victoria being a killer have to do with the way her husband treats her? First of all, almost everyone on this show is a killer or attempted killer- it's the motivations that matter. The only blood on Victoria's hands is Helen Crowley's and the only reason Victoria murdered her was because Helen threatened Daniel's life. Any mother would have done the same exact thing in Victoria's shoes; let's be real here.


    Conrad has kept Victoria trapped in their marriage via blackmail this entire season so any lashings out of hers are 100% justified. She doesn't owe shit to a man who has been verbally and emotionally abusing her for the greater part of their marriage. And give me a break, she slapped Charlotte once for God's sake. Tons of parents hit their kids on occasion when they misbehave. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with it but hitting your child once isn't abuse and Charlotte gets along with her just fine. None of this has any relevance to what I was saying in the first place so I fail to see why you would even bring it up.


    Also, you failed to understand what Victoria was saying in the clip. She wasn't refusing to take blame for framing David, she was refusing to take blame for the fact that Conrad laundered money for Americon Initiative- something she found out about after the Flight 197 crash when Conrad came clean to her about his dirty dealings. So, no, she's not putting on a fake victim routine here. She had NOTHING to do with that plane exploding.


    Perhaps you should give S1 a rewatch before you start challenging other people with false information.

    ReplyDelete
  5. eclt831 May 2014 at 21:15

    Victoria took pleasure killing Helen. Didn't you see her smile?
    Conrad signed divorce papers this season, and happily helped Pascal to win over Victoria. He was also ready to marry Lydia before Victoria decided to frame Lydia for Emily's shooting. I did not see him blackmailing her to stay married at all.


    Tons of parents slap their kids? Are you f-ing kidding me? In what world do they do that?! Assulting minors is what I call that, no matter how much the kid screws up.


    Victoria accepted framing someone else in Conrad's place from the very beginning. Or don't you remember what she told Tim DeKay's character - that it was supposed to have been him.


    And if you remember correctly, Conrad didn't have anything to do with bombing that plane either. Launder money is not the same thing as committing a terrorist act. He's said time and time again, even to Helen, that he had no idea they had planned to bomb that plane. Launder money is a crime. Yes. But it's far less serious than a terrorist act.


    So you should re-watch the whole show before you claim that Victoria is such a sweet innocent victim. Cause she's certainly not. She's a first class villain, just like Conrad. And that is why Emily is targetting BOTH of them.

    ReplyDelete
  6. eclt831 May 2014 at 21:16

    Besides, I am sure Victoria is the one who's kidnapping Charlotte. To get Conrad to confess, so that he'll land himself in prison.

    ReplyDelete
  7. MLTC2 May 2014 at 00:04

    If it was this easy then Emily should've kidnapped Charlotte a long time ago!

    ReplyDelete
  8. RevengerNikki2 May 2014 at 06:24

    just wanted to tell you.
    Conrad grabbed Victoria the same way Daniel grabbed Emily in 3x13. Around the neck and forced them down.
    i cant wait till Emily takes their asses down.


    now dont say Victoria attacked Conrad first,. coz i think Conrad killing Pascal makes that arguement invalid.
    but yes in terms of Conrad and Victoria playing the you did this, no we did this. its both their fault.
    I hate that Victoria always says "you did this". like serioulsy Victoria you had about as much to do with it as Conrad. if you actually wen tto the public in the first place you wouldnt be in this mess 20 years later, and David (and others) would still be alive.
    and though this has nothing to do with Conrad attacking Victoria like that. Victoria has no right to be all "murderer" on him. shes a murderer too, and both of them have shockingly killed unarmed people (same as Aiden).

    ReplyDelete
  9. RevengerNikki2 May 2014 at 06:31

    actually on the terms of the marriage.
    Victoria was happy to be married to him until half way through season 1, of which Conrad actually blackmailed her to stay in season 2.


    It shows no blackmail, other than Victoria saying it to Patrick of which other things in that very same arguement was false too (btw no not the rape).


    Victoria had money. Victoria was always happy to be in that marriage if she had money and if life was ok. She showed this again in 3x07 (i think) where she said to Conrad "theres no money so im out of this marriage".
    so yea.


    and Victoria wasnt saying only talking about the laundering. she was talking about everything. shes always s said it was conrad. always. she barely ever takes the blame. She still ceases to realize that the David scandal goes far deeper than just what she did to David. and that in her mind she did everything she did to save him. well hate to say it. she did nothing to stop it. she went to one corrupt lawyer. shes powerful and famous. are you seriously telling me she couldnt go public in a flash. give me a break.

    ReplyDelete
  10. RevengerNikki2 May 2014 at 06:35

    The writers have always floated around the possibilty that Conrad had more to do with it.
    i mean the fact that Conrad got Pascal to kill Trevor Mathis, which had nothing directly to do with the David Clarke scandal shows theres far more to it.
    i thinknext season their gonna reveal that Conrad knew about the bomb and laundered for them for money, but was shocked that they were framing him the whole time. the initiative would totally do that. and so would Conrad.

    ReplyDelete
  11. RevengerNikki2 May 2014 at 06:36

    thats exactly what i said. lol.
    so true. if this actually works.
    im gonna face-palm myself. but i think somethiing goes wrong. like conrad dies.

    ReplyDelete
  12. eclt832 May 2014 at 15:48

    I don't think so. The initiative storyline is over and done with. And Emily doesn't want revenge for the actual plane being brought down. She wants revenge for her father being falsly accused and taken away from her. That is her goal. And Victoria was every bit as guilty of that as Conrad, because she helped him frame an innocent man. She would have even gladly done it if it had been someone other than David. She wanted to frame that other guy. But when that didn't work out, she was forced to sacrifice David instead. Well, not really forced. She had a choice not to testify against him or hide evidence. She could have easily chosen to frame Conrad instead, like the Initiative wanted. But she chose Conrad because of Daniel and the lifestyle.


    Emily will never forgive that. David trusted Victoria 100% and wanted Amanda to do the same. But Amanda and Victoria obviously never liked each other. Not even when Amanda was a little kid. A normal woman who loves a man would make sure to take care of his little girl if he could not. Victoria didn't care one tiny little bit about what happened to Amanda. And Emily hates Victoria for that too, as she was forced to grow up under horrible circumstances.


    So really, it doesn't even matter if Conrad knew more than what we know he knew. Emily didn't go after the Initiative who blew up planes and other terrorist activity. She went after the Graysons and everyone who helped the Graysons frame her father. That is the bottom line for Emily and the whole show. To bring down everyone who helped frame her father and took him away from her.

    ReplyDelete
  13. eclt832 May 2014 at 15:57

    Victoria would never go public with her own role in the David framing. She wants Conrad to take all the blame. Absolutely. There is no way that she'd be willing to go to prison for it. But she wants Conrad to be jailed.


    Happy in her marriage? How many times haven't Victoria said that her marriage with Conrad has always been "loveless" and that she chose him only for money? Conrad has admitted a number of times that he was in love with Victoria when they met and married. He never said when he stopped, but I assume it was duing the time Victoria slept with David. He tried to make her love him, but when she wouldn't even try, he started having affairs to get some kind of affection and "closeness". In season 1, they only slept in the same bed, nothing more. Victoria appeared to be the ice queen, lacking all kinds of emotion and humor. If she was indeed happy married to Conrad, she'd sleep with him and actually look somewhat happy. As far as we know, Victoria thought she loved Conrad for a little while, but knew it was more about money and lifestyle. Conrad was in love with Victoria and tried to make her happy. Realized he couldn't and gave up eventually.

    ReplyDelete
  14. RevengerNikki3 May 2014 at 06:14

    No no. You don't understand.
    There's a difference in being happy in love in a marriage, and happy to be in a marriage because it's stable. And that's coz of the money and lifestyle.
    She hates Conrad. That's obvious and fair enough.c
    But if she was totally against him, and away unhappy in the marriage she would have left decades ago. But she didn't. In season 1 and 3 her divorces to him we're piss easy. If she was forced in the marriage she wouldn't have been able to get divorced so easily. but she didn't, because she loves the lifestyle, and for 2decades it was satisfactory to be in a marriage with a man she didn't love.
    Victoria was never forced to stay in the marriage for two decades, only time she was, was in the first half of season 3.

    ReplyDelete
  15. RevengerNikki24 August 2014 at 08:27

    I never said she was 'happy in her marriage". Especially lately.
    However, she was happy to be in a marriage that provided money, status and security.
    Until Emily returned and thr ruined everything for them, she was fine in being in that marriage.
    She could easily get a divorce years before like what she did in season 1. But she didn't.
    Why not? Well like Victoria said in 3x07 now that we have no money, there is no reason for marriage (not exact quote obviously but the best I could put it). Victoria basically admitted that she never divorced Conrad because she was happy with the money supply going into her pockets, which is what she wanted when she helped frame David. Which she has constantly said that a part of her framing David was because Conrad had money and David didn't.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.