Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon POLL : What did you think of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit - Thought Criminal?
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

POLL : What did you think of Law & Order: Special Victims Unit - Thought Criminal?

15 May 2014

Share on Reddit


-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

8 comments:

  1. ღ ღ ღ15 May 2014 at 03:37

    Tonight's episode was boring as hell. sad to say.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Justin Baptista15 May 2014 at 03:56

    Amaro finally snapped. Like the perp of the week, he was a time bomb waiting to go off.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kristin15 May 2014 at 14:09

    I did not enjoy this episode. I don't watch regularly anymore but it seems like every time I do it's just blah.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Joanna Walton15 May 2014 at 16:48

    you have certainly missed out on a lot of good episodes this season.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Joanna Walton15 May 2014 at 16:49

    Amaro beating up the suspect reminded me of Pino's former Character Valens on Cold Case. He also beat up a suspect but never got in trouble

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bj Garnaus15 May 2014 at 16:58

    I didn't care for it to be honest. I like more action, excitement, "sitting on the edge of my seat." And I miss Mariska being in an action role . . . out on the streets, running, energetic, busting perps the way she used to. That is one of her great gifts to the show.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sara15 May 2014 at 23:41

    I think that both Amaro & Olivia need to leave SVU. They both just get so blinded that they forget the law. I've thought for a while that Olivia should be transferred to another department but Amaro defiantly shouldn't be working there anymore.



    As for the case I agreed with the jury. You can't arrest someone for a crime they haven't actually committing. Nothing he had done was actually illegal.

    ReplyDelete
  8. everyoneissleeping17 May 2014 at 21:18

    I liked it. The question of whether or not you can judge
    somebody for „just thinking” about committing a crime, in a situation when the
    person has begun taking steps toward making the thoughts a reality, was an interesting
    one.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.