Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Castle - Episode 6.23 - For Better or For Worse (Season Finale) - Promo
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Castle - Episode 6.23 - For Better or For Worse (Season Finale) - Promo

6 May 2014

Share on Reddit

-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

61 comments:

  1. klutzy_girl6 May 2014 at 04:04

    Ew. Did they really have to go the surprise spouse route? Like seriously? I'm sure they'll still get married, but no thank you to that "twist".

    ReplyDelete
  2. cris6 May 2014 at 04:13

    I thought basically the exact same thing...ugh!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kathrin6 May 2014 at 04:17

    WTF dude. I am so majorly disappointed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. phnxgrl6 May 2014 at 04:24

    So they did a trope but Kate does not know of it?? Interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  5. nie6 May 2014 at 04:28

    Fantastic. Now everytime I'll be watching older seasons (specially S1) all i am gonna think about is that she is married. And omg its so unbelievable. Bigfoot is more believable. Wtf did they just do.

    ReplyDelete
  6. ifonlyalways6 May 2014 at 04:35

    maybe she had to get married for an undercover mission awhile back... lol

    ReplyDelete
  7. jeff6 May 2014 at 04:39

    Well, i am pretty sure that when she got the job with the AG Office, they would have done a background check. I am pretty sure that they would have found easily that she was already married. And dealing with classified material they would probably want to ark her who her husband was and chick him out too. So there is a major plot hole right there.

    But let say that they did not, in the preview she said that she is not married so either she was con and never knew about it or she was drunk and do not remember, Honnestly between the two i am not sure which one to choose, but i guess they will probably go with the con story by looking at the description of the guy in the spooler. This probably happen right after her mother was killed and she was probably vulnerable back then. Anyway just a guess.

    Only 1 more episode and then a long 4 month of hiatus :(

    ReplyDelete
  8. Laura Green6 May 2014 at 04:47

    Anybody think that this may just be a clerical error? I'm pretty sure she would have remembered getting married unless she was drunk and in vegas at the time so I'm calling either clerical error or someone stole her identity and that is the "kate beckett" that is married

    ReplyDelete
  9. Giorgio Corrado6 May 2014 at 05:33

    What they couldn't go the pregnant route ?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Natalie Powell6 May 2014 at 06:07

    Not worried at all, there have been misleading promos before

    ReplyDelete
  11. Babar Suhail6 May 2014 at 06:15

    I am laughing at how predictable this was.

    ReplyDelete
  12. itsbighead6 May 2014 at 06:33

    im laughing at how crap this show is

    ReplyDelete
  13. Stang886 May 2014 at 06:43

    Another total FAIL by Marlowe. The Kate Beckett of season 5-6 is NOT the same Kate Beckett of season 1-4.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Stang886 May 2014 at 06:44

    Except the Marlowe does NOT DO continuity, he just makes it up as he goes.

    ReplyDelete
  15. SHIELDNCISfan6 May 2014 at 06:56

    overreacting over this promo which do not give much detail.........it probably a mistake

    ReplyDelete
  16. Triqums6 May 2014 at 07:14

    exactly. I mean with no murder in this episode.. they need something to investigate right? ;)

    ReplyDelete
  17. Maria Ferreira6 May 2014 at 07:37

    I saw somewhere a theory from a fan that would be great...this is a prank from Castle as payback for "Lives of others"...wouldn´t that be fun?!

    ReplyDelete
  18. László Harsányi6 May 2014 at 07:40

    - It is 99% a mistake, at least I hope very, very much. Otherwise (no matter that it was a drunken tour to Vegas with an instant - but legal - divorce, or else) there are a lot of four letter words on the account to Mr Marlowe.


    - No matter if it is a mistake or not, doing this plot as the season finale is one of the worst idea from the writers. It doesn't matter what will be the conclusion, the mere idea of using this plot is bad.
    Castle had already copied so many main plot turns shamelessly from Bones that even though that was my first thought when I read Eddie McClintock's role, I convinced myself that I must be wrong. No matter how low my opinion is about Marlowe's story weaving talent even he can't be that low. This week episode was a pleasant surprise - seems they want to balance it.

    ReplyDelete
  19. start_wearing_purple6 May 2014 at 07:46

    You could make the argument that she's been a well developed character. To paraphrase Capt. Montgomery, Beckett was a great detective who didn't enjoy her job prior to meeting Castle. I'd say the Kate Beckett of the last 2 seasons is different from the early Kate Beckett early on because Castle made her job less about her painful past while actually allowing her to heal.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Yasmine6 May 2014 at 08:25

    It could still be a Prank from Castle...

    ReplyDelete
  21. Babar Suhail6 May 2014 at 08:32

    Nah.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yasmine6 May 2014 at 08:35

    You don't know that. Either it's this or the promo is misleading...Don't think 'Milmar' are capable of this to tell the truth..

    ReplyDelete
  23. László Harsányi6 May 2014 at 08:54

    As I wrote above: no IMHO it's not fun, not the least.


    At the end of TLoO Beckett was seriously concerned that her prank might misfired and with good reason. But even if that could have happened, it was a birthday, something you have every year, and can be remedy. If Castle were willing to risk Kate's unclouded happiness on a once in a lifetime moment in her life for a prank, that would be a huge letdown on his character.


    It doesn't matter that - if that is the plot - the ending in the show will be shiny and happy and everything will be allright. (Because I have no doubt that this would happen.) The problem is that Castle shouldn't act as if he know that it's just a show where everything will be allright.

    ReplyDelete
  24. wesley gotje6 May 2014 at 09:58

    Meanwhile a certain writing couple in Mexico is having a laugh while drinking a pinocolada, its good too see a promo do its job on freaking fans out.

    ReplyDelete
  25. wesley gotje6 May 2014 at 09:59

    Happy promo day!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Bob6 May 2014 at 10:04

    I don't get why this is freaking so many people out. So what if she's already married? The idea that she made a mistake when she was younger isn't too farfetched (although the idea that background checks wouldn't have brought it up long before now is).

    This is clearly meant to be a light relief episode (undoubtedly with the happy ending for all you shippers at the end). So what if it's not believable? Pretty much the entire premise of the show is comical.

    ReplyDelete
  27. someinsanity6 May 2014 at 10:10

    Oooooh, so the still-hubby has gotta be Eddie McClintock's character, right?
    Can someone write me some Pete Lattimer and Kate Beckett meeting at Comic Con fic?

    ReplyDelete
  28. ViKi6 May 2014 at 10:18

    Um, now I'm thinking Penny and her 'fake' wedding in Vegas...

    ReplyDelete
  29. shred6 May 2014 at 10:50

    Do you not know that AM play by his own rules? *rolls eyes*

    ReplyDelete
  30. shred6 May 2014 at 10:50

    Seriously?1 WTF! I would rather have a pregnancy thing.


    I really hope it's some prank or a very misleading promo.

    ReplyDelete
  31. shred6 May 2014 at 10:53

    It's not that it's not ok she was married before - it's the fact that this one big plot hole. In s1, Kate said she hasn't been married before. Before joining the FBI, they would have found this out. So how does one explain this? I"m sorry but I don't buy it.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Babar Suhail6 May 2014 at 11:01

    Yep, first thing I thought of when I saw the promo.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Babar Suhail6 May 2014 at 11:01

    But how did she forget she is married?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Bob6 May 2014 at 11:02

    In the real world they would have yes, but Castle world hasn't been believable for many, many years so that should not really matter.


    Castle hasn't really ever given much credence to realism so why would the writers start now?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Bob6 May 2014 at 11:05

    Maybe she got so wasted sometime that the previous hours of her life were blank. It happens.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Babar Suhail6 May 2014 at 11:06

    That's still pretty OOC for Beckett.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Bob6 May 2014 at 11:10

    Is it? We've followed Beckett's character for several years now, and we've seen that she's always struggled with her mother's death even as an adult. The idea that she fell off the wagon at one stage when she was younger and simply could not deal with the fact her mother was gone isn't that tenuous.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Crowsfan6 May 2014 at 11:23

    It's obvious they were in a bind once they made the decision to wrap up the murder conspiracy plotline before she got married. Which I'm happy about because having her solve it all during the wedding episode would have been very cliche.

    The problem is that they still need something to solve in the wedding episode, they can't just make a happy little fanvid of the two of them walking down the aisle and everything being perfect.

    Hence the mystery spouse. It's definitely a massive plot hole but it's not out of character.

    ReplyDelete
  39. shred6 May 2014 at 11:23

    If it was a little things, sure. It's forgivable. But this is messing up one huge character trait here. It would have been more believable if it was Castle that was still married - to Meredith or Gina. Why didn't they go down that route?


    Sorry, I don't think you can convince me that this is ok.

    ReplyDelete
  40. shred6 May 2014 at 11:25

    Why couldn't they have Castle still married to one of his wives? Why Beckett? It would have been more unbelievable if it was Castle still being married - even to someone else completely new. THAT would have been in character seeing what a playboy he was when he was younger.

    ReplyDelete
  41. laura33416 May 2014 at 12:34

    Why does it always have to be Castle? I actually find it refreshing that it isn't Castle for once. Beckett was probably undercover with this guy,they 'played' getting married and were. They will waist 20 minutes of the show getting this resolved then they get married in the last 5 minutes.

    ReplyDelete
  42. shred6 May 2014 at 12:46

    "Why does it always have to be Castle?" LOL. Why does it always have to be Beckett?!


    Compared to Beckett, Castle has hardly gotten any worthy storyline.


    And no, I'm not counting the crap of a storyline that is Jackson Hunt.

    ReplyDelete
  43. SYLVIA20366 May 2014 at 13:13

    Bones went down this road with Angela and Hodgins and the story lasted for ages. I do hope that is not what the cliffhanger is going to be. Very boring and not worthy of Castle's writers.

    ReplyDelete
  44. laura33416 May 2014 at 13:35

    I guess i don't think Castle being married for a fourth time is a worthy storyline.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Crowsfan6 May 2014 at 15:39

    Castle is a somewhat public figure, so if he was married, it would not be a secret.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Maria Nava6 May 2014 at 16:03

    How many psychics are there in here? Because that's the only reason I can figure out for people overreacting when they haven't. Even. Watched. The episode.... Crazy suggestion here but maybe first see how they play it out and then judge all you want.

    ReplyDelete
  47. laura33416 May 2014 at 16:15

    This happens all the time with Castle fans,at least here. I stopped coming to these threads for that reason,didn't think the promo would cause all this.

    ReplyDelete
  48. wesley gotje6 May 2014 at 16:17

    And all of this before having seen the episode? Bravo!

    ReplyDelete
  49. shred6 May 2014 at 16:17

    But you can have Kate being married and not having the FBI know about it? Right.


    I get the ep needs a crime to solve but why this? Why not them finding their minister dead? Or something unrelated - like maybe they stumble upon a case and it's a race against time to have it solve before they need to be at the church? Or heck! Maybe Pi turns up dead and Castle's best man is the prime suspect.


    If the only reason for having Kate being married is to fill up time, then this is the lamest way to do it.


    Still hoping it's some sort of prank or a very misleading promo.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Koky6 May 2014 at 17:04

    Really? That's the best you could come up with? A surprise marriage that she can't remember? I mean even Penny remembered getting married, she didn't think it was real but she remembered.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Pearcecymru6 May 2014 at 20:13

    Every spoiler site and there are people picking holes in even the best shows. It's TV enjoy it for what it is and wait for the episode to air first (promos can be very misleading). Great season I think, great show & writers:)

    ReplyDelete
  52. Crowsfan6 May 2014 at 22:09

    I said it was a plot hole, but it is still in character.

    I don't know why you're so violently opposed to this, Castle's like the champion of lame a** tropes and cliches. Pretty much every episode has a couple, why are you choosing this one to get pissy over?


    Why is it so important to you that Kate's never been married before? Does it bother you that Castle's about to marry his fourth wife? I think you have a bit of a double standard going here, maybe you need to check yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  53. shred7 May 2014 at 12:47

    OMG! You're so right. I mean, here's me trying to find some sense in this plot but really it's just me having a double standard. D'oh!

    ReplyDelete
  54. Crowsfan7 May 2014 at 14:46

    What's so nonsensical about it? You don't know any of the circumstances of this surprise spouse yet. Why don't you just wait for the episode before banging on about how it doesn't make sense.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Vick7 May 2014 at 23:40

    Just have faith!! Do you remember the "Watershed" promo from last year?
    I think they're just try to mislead us!!

    ReplyDelete
  56. Leks8 May 2014 at 03:12

    I think was @laura3341 meant was why does it always have to be Castle that has to screw up. lol.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Leks8 May 2014 at 03:21

    I know eh! LOL! People form such opinionated thoughts on THE PROMO! Maybe watch the episode first then review (criticize) the episode... Everyone knows ABC likes to create drama or play tricks with their previews.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Leks8 May 2014 at 03:26

    I mean I'm not saying that the idea that Beckett was previously married and the writers using that in the wedding episode doesn't disappoint me, but at least let's just wait and see.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Maria Nava8 May 2014 at 03:37

    I just hope the do actually get married this season. That's where I draw my disappointment line

    ReplyDelete
  60. Leks8 May 2014 at 03:59

    Yeah actually I had a worried thought that maybe that could be used as a cliffhanger and they don't actually get married until the season 7 premiere. Gosh I cannot wait that long haha.

    ReplyDelete
  61. shred8 May 2014 at 10:56

    Ah well, if you put it in that way, I'm with you there.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.