Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon 24: Live Another Day – 11am-12pm/12pm-1pm – Review: Jack is Back


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

24: Live Another Day – 11am-12pm/12pm-1pm – Review: Jack is Back

7 May 2014

Share on Reddit


June 6th, 2010. The last time I watched a brand new episode of 24. 1,431 days ago. On May 13th last year, 359 days ago, FOX announced the return of the show in the form of 24: Live Another Day. Since then, I have been on edge, desperately awaiting its return. Monday night, I finally got my wish. I had high expectations. The premiere didn’t hit my expectations.

It exceeded them, damn it!

It didn’t actually occur to me just how much I had missed 24 until that clock, 6 minutes into the opening episode, came onto my screen. And the return did not disappoint. 24 is known by many of its fans for its high-quality premieres, and ‘11am-12pm’ certainly falls under the category of high-quality. It was well-paced, which is what every episode of the season needs to be. It was high-octane in places; slower in others, and this worked well. While an hour of high-octane action can work well, it doesn’t always. This was a good combination, and I really enjoyed it.

We were introduced to a plethora of new characters (this wasn’t a major change from previous seasons, with the exception of seasons 2 and 5 perhaps, as we did usually get a lot of new faces on a season-by-season basis), many of whom I liked. Kate Morgan was the real stand-out, portrayed as a sort of female Jack. She had an interesting backstory in that her husband was selling secrets to the Chinese (hey, better to tell us the mole got caught BEFORE the season began than have one throughout), but despite her powers of deduction with Jack (really though, these guys are CIA, tracking Jack Bauer, yet don’t know a thing about him. This could totally be 24: The Following), she didn’t know what was going on with her husband? If she turns out to be the mole, there may be some angry remarks from me.

I wasn’t really sure what to make of Steve Navarro, head of CTU CIA London. I am drawing some parallels to Lynn McGill, in that he thinks he’s doing the right thing for both the country and his career. Catching Jack gives the potential to advance his career, while also preventing (or thinks he’s preventing) Jack from harming the President (or committing other terrorist attacks).


Erik Ritter, billed as Kate’s replacement, immediately frustrated me. He’s the kind of guy who has no regard for anything but his promotion, and because this is his only focus, he’d be oblivious if a grenade went off next to him. Now, I’m not trying to imply he’s an idiot, because I’m sure that he’s perfectly competent. However, I do really want him to actually start focussing on the task at hand, rather than continue to whine about Kate being kept on.

Mark Boudreau, Audrey’s husband and President Heller’s chief of staff. He has already become a love-hate character for me. While his idea of handing Jack to the Russians made me hate him, he is trying to protect his wife, which is understandable. However, it wasn’t until the second hour that I began to like him. His seemingly over-the-top outburst at Heller in an attempt to replicate a potential Parliament session was fantastic. He isn’t afraid to be realistic and aggressive, even with the President. Some may have seen this as harsh considering Heller’s illness (more on that in a minute), but I respected him for it.

Adrian Cross, introduced in the second hour, was promoted as the head of a WikiLeaks-like organisation, yet, he seemed to end up taking orders from Chloe. He also seemed to have some sort of grudge with Jack (I could be over-analysing it, and he was just pissed that Jack broke into his hideout). I’m looking forward to his development this season, though can we not have a relationship between him and Chloe please?

Michelle Fairley was briefly shown as terrorist Margot, and she made a hell of an impression. She’s not the kind of terrorist you want to even think about double-crossing. In fact, her daughter seems even more evil than her thus far. The best villains usually make great first impressions, and these two have certainly done that.

The other character we were introduced to was Jordan Reed, who felt like the new Chloe. Skilled on a computer, he helped out Kate despite the fact that she wasn’t authorised to look at the files he acquired for her. Their dynamic is already very Jack-Chloe like.

And now for the returning characters. Heller, having been absent since the end of season 6, has managed to work his way up into the Presidency. Audrey, who last we saw was mentally ill after being held captive by the Chinese, has recovered and is now living the high life with her father (and new husband Mark). Things aren’t all fine and dandy for Heller however, as he has early onset Alzheimer’s. It clearly affected him in these first two hours, as he forgot the name of the fourth soldier killed by the drone. It’s sad to see him like this, because I came to like Heller all those years ago.

Chloe returned, with possibly the most ridiculous look I’ve ever seen. Clearly she’s made some lifestyle changes in the past four years. I miss the geeky Chloe we got in season 3. Anyway, she is now in charge of a group of hackers, an organisation whose sole purpose is to expose government secrets.

And now for the main man. It took him three quarters of the opening hour to speak, but finally we were able to say that Jack is back. Of course, we had seen him take out the majority of a CIA team before this. But Jack could never be truly back until he said that famous word. And damn it, it was fantastic! Though, his second, rather loud utterance was even better (we even had another of my favourite Jack lines just before, in “son of a bitch”).

It was sad to see Jack refuse to admit that he has friends. Chloe’s reassurance that she is his friend was great to see, but Jack’s supposed lack of friends is a depressing thought to have for our hero. For those new to the series, all of Jack’s other friends were either killed or became a terrorist and tried to kill him, so I can sort of understand Jack not making any new friends. He’s protecting people by being a lonely, lonely man.

I’m interested to hear quite what has happened for Jack and Chloe in the past four years. I would assume that something happened with Morris or Prescott (her husband and son respectively, for you newcomers), turning her into this anti-government, angry non-Chloe.

As for the story, it was very quick to pull me in. All the pre-released material (press releases, promos etc.) alerted us to the fact that this was going to be about a threat to Heller and an attack involving drones. But, other than the final minutes of the premiere hour (and Boudreau’s eagerness to assume Jack is in London to harm Heller), there wasn’t really any indication towards either of these plots until the second hour. The first hour focused almost solely on introducing us to the new characters and Jack rescuing Chloe. As aforementioned, this allowed the story to progress at a well-constructed pace, and that really helped make the episode one of the better ones the show has done.

The second hour shifted its way to focus more on the threat. Jack’s line to Kate that he’s “trying to prevent an attack on President Heller”, along with the fallout from Yates’ drone hack in the previous episode began to show us small pieces of the 24: Live Another Day puzzle. While I know from experience that this kind of episode can stand on its own, I think it works far better when airing back-to-back with an episode that is almost its antithesis. The two-hour premiere worked brilliantly because of this.

I felt that the first hour was a much better hour than the second. Now, that’s not to say that the second hour was bad, because it wasn’t. I just felt that the first hour was superior in each aspect of the show. I’ll admit, as excited as I was for the return, I was terrified that Live Another Day would be a complete failure. However, this premiere proved me wrong, with two brilliant episodes that really set the tone for the rest of the season.

Decrypting the CTU files (otherwise known as odds and ends):

  • The list of Jack's kills was cool.  
  • One of the main things I love about 24 is the unique title sequences, time stamps and the awesome credit music. The lack of a title card until 6 minutes into the premiere freaked me out. As did the lack of a ‘Previously on 24’ in the second hour (even with traditional two-hour premieres, we get a previously). We must have one next week, surely? The split screens worked brilliantly as usual. The much brighter light used for the text didn’t sit right with me, and then the credits used the traditional brightness of text. The credit music is still fantastically unchanged, although it did run a little short.
  • One thing I loved about this premiere was that it felt like 24 again. The opening scene worried me, since there was no clock or ‘The following takes place between 11am and 12pm. Events occur in real time’ until after Jack was arrested. I worried then that this may not feel like 24. However, I was again proven wrong, as the next 114 minutes felt as if the show had never been gone.
  • “Intelligence agencies keep secrets, because what they’re doing is criminal.” Back up a second Chloe. What did CTU do on a regular basis? And you worked for them…? I don’t like hypocritical Chloe.
  • “You know who I am. Trigger an alarm and I’ll blow your head off.” “You probably think I’m at a disadvantage, I promise you, I’m not.” Jack has not changed in the slightest, and I love it.
  • Nice inclusion of Kim. But 24, if you’re going to include her in this series, no cougars please.
  • Sean Callery! How I’ve missed you and your awesome scores. Nice to see that the music quality hasn’t declined over the four years the show has been gone.
  • Colin Salmon sounds weird with an American accent. On that, this show is set in London, yet the majority of main/recurring characters we come across are American. It feels weird.
  • It’s been four years. Jack, have you had anything to eat or drink in the past four years? Or gone to the toilet?
  • Ranking time. I’m only comparing the first hour here. I would rank this second out of the nine so far, behind the sublime season 5 premiere (which I would never expect any television episode to ever surpass in terms of quality). 
  • Thanks to Sky 1 (24's UK broadcaster), we have a Jack Bauer bingo card to play around with. I count seven already.


So, that was the 24: Live Another Day premiere! Please leave a comment with your thoughts from the episodes. I’m particularly interested to hear the thoughts of those of you who didn’t watch the original show, and whether you thought it was easy to follow. 24 old-timers: how does it feel to have Jack back?

Bradley Adams
15 year old in England. Love Hawaii Five-0, NCIS, NCIS LA, Person of Interest, Elementary, Criminal Minds, Nikita and Arrow, and the new The Blacklist, Hostages and The Tomorrow People. I am reviewing Person of Interest and The Tomorrow People for Spoiler TV. I run an Arrow blog, ArrowFansUK. Aside from TV, a keen cricketer.

17 comments:

  1. I read a review somewhere else (not in English, which is why I'm not posting the link) that said watching 24 was like seeing an old friend. And I think this is precisely what it could be. IMO, back when 24 was created, it was innovative and bold. Today, not so much (or not at all). TV evolved, shows are much better, more diverse, going the distance, engaging on different themes that were previously ignored. In that sense, I don't see much reason for sticking to 24, unless, as I said, you already liked it before.

    ReplyDelete
  2. i really hope it gets renewed for next summer, they have said that it could expand to moore seasons so lets keep our fingers croosed for this amazing tv show. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bradley Adams7 May 2014 at 17:57

    I assume you're a new viewer? I think there are a lot of aspects that make this show really enjoyable.

    ReplyDelete
  4. totally agree with bradley this show is so good from episode 1 to 24 but now that we only have 12 episodes it will be moore action: :D cant wait for episode 3

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nope, I'm not. That's why I quite like the premiere and will most likely end up watching the season.
    I mostly agree with you, it is enjoyable and fun. But the thing is I don't see it as a super innovative, must-see series, like it probably was 10 years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bradley Adams7 May 2014 at 18:06

    Yeah, I can see that. I would say that while the first season was good, it didn't become must-see until the ending of the finale. But then again, 24 has the uniqueness after eight seasons worth of TV, we've only seen eight days of Jack Bauer's life. And that's innovative in itself.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sure. All I mean is that 24 will face a different audience and a different outset this time around. 10 years ago, it was awfully bold of Fox to air a show that had stuff blowing up all the time and violence in pretty much every episode. And they were VERY lucky, 'cause it started right after 9/11. Now, cable TV has taken networks to another level. I mean, look at Hannibal. It airs on NBC and it's quite possibly the goriest show at the moment.
    I still think it will maintain steady ratings, mostly because Jack Bauer is an icon and lots of people enjoy seeing Kiefer in action, me included ;)

    ReplyDelete
  8. i am agreeing with you there inhighheels there are alot of diffrent tv shows now than when 24 started, but still enjoying seeing kiefer in action tough :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bradley Adams7 May 2014 at 18:17

    Yep. The premiere episode actually had a plane explosion at the end. The episode was set to air on October 30th, but it was pushed back a week because of 9/11.

    FOX has done a lot of promotion for this. Steady ratings would hopefully be a given.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Nice inclusion of Kim. But 24, if you’re going to include her in this series, no cougars please."


    I'm sorry, what? What have I missed? Is this Kim Bauer we're talking about, or is there someone else whom I've forgotten? :o

    ReplyDelete
  11. Looooove like always, great show

    ReplyDelete
  12. SHIELDNCISfan7 May 2014 at 19:53

    Wouldn't be a suprise if the Russian President is behind the attacks......and if there is a season 10, Jack will go to Moscow

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bradley Adams7 May 2014 at 20:07

    That would annoy me.

    ReplyDelete
  14. SHIELDNCISfan7 May 2014 at 20:18

    well maybe it would better to have completely new storyline for this season 9 and return to the Russian storyline in season 10 if renewed...

    ReplyDelete
  15. Bradley, great review, and don't worry, the iTunes version (AKA the version that'll end up on DVDs/Blu-rays) had a Previously on 24 segment at the beginning of episode 9.02, same style as the previous eight seasons (the text in the split screens was as bright as the ones used for the rest of the episode). And the end credits music was perfectly synchronised too.


    I very much enjoyed the premiere too, the first hour was cleverly constructed and overall better than the second, but the latter had plenty of good moments too. I like that they're taking their time to develop the plot (e.g: we didn't know why Jack broke Chloe out of the CIA until episode 9.02 - that is, if we hadn't seen countless promos saying he had intel on an assassination threat on Heller ^^.


    What I noticed in episode 9.02, and I think it's true for episode 9.01 too, is that there was only one clock at the bottom of the screen, that one :




    I liked it much better when the previous eight seasons had at least 5 or 6 of those in each episode. They're not necessary in any way, but it's a nice nod to the time passing by. The one in episode 9.02 was cleverly placed because Yates was just talking about how we was going to get paid in about 28 minutes, but still, I'd like some more clocks randomly appearing, because to me that's also why 24 is 24.


    Also, I never realized that you're 15, Bradley - and I've also noticed that fellow contributor Brandon Rowe doesn't seem much older. Damn it I'm old (sigh). You were 11 when season 8 ended, which means you were very young when you first watched the rest of the show. I did get hooked on 24 when I was 12, but I can't imagine someone who's 9 or 10 years old watching it. Good for you for having such good taste as such a young age!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Bradley Adams8 May 2014 at 16:47

    Thanks. Yeah, I checked my Sky Go (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sky_Go) and it was there - the credits were fine too. Damn internet copies.


    Yeah, I had to go back through the episode to see if I could spot one. If you're not watching live, watching without adverts or watching with adverts but not starting on the hour, you lose that sense of time until the advert break clocks. I remember that they often used them even in those last 2 minutes after a split screen at the end of an episode. Not necessary, but nice to have. It's a 24 trademark.


    I think you're probably the first person to ever point that out, despite the fact that it's in my bio that's on the team page and every review I've written this season. I don't usually point it out, to be fair, since I expect all those "violence at a young age leads to people becoming serial killers' activists to come out in full force, which I think is BS but I'm not getting into a discussion about it (anyone who tries to start one with me will be ignored). I only came into it because I saw my mum watching an episode, and I've been hooked since then.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Now that I think about it - Hulu's version had a "previously on 24" bit. Helpful to get character names down. Through the first hour I didn't know and I'm terrible with names. Even worse at catching character names as they go by. Let's see.... Jack, Chloe, Jack-like-blond-girl, CTU bossman, CTU computer guy who inevitable has to help someone do something against the wishes of CTU bossman, self-centered jerk guy, Catelyn Stark, The president, non-catatonic Audrey, Audrey's tool of a husband, Bimbo who's not really a bimbo, and so on....

    I thought the first two episodes were definitely vintage 24. I like the sense of not quite knowing who's up to what. I love the intensity. I love when someone figures something out, needs to tell someone else, but that someone else is too confused by the urgency to figure it out.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.