Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Once Upon a Time - Episode 3.15 - Quiet Minds - Sneak Peek 2
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Once Upon a Time - Episode 3.15 - Quiet Minds - Sneak Peek 2

27 Mar 2014

Share on Reddit
Thanks to Stephon and Derisor for the heads up.


Source: TVLine
-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

67 comments:

  1. StanJS27 March 2014 at 16:25

    I have a strange feeling that monkey is Neal

    ReplyDelete
  2. RumbelleIsMyHope27 March 2014 at 16:34

    WOW ROBERT CARLYLE HE'S SO AMAZING.

    ReplyDelete
  3. IraNiki27 March 2014 at 16:39

    Daddy Charming with his girl. So cute)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Michu194527 March 2014 at 16:57

    Good theory. I never thought about that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Spindae227 March 2014 at 17:12

    Didn't thought they would find Gold so soon. I think it would be much harder.

    ReplyDelete
  6. ouathebest27 March 2014 at 17:20

    I do not understand what are the voices he hears Gold and especially why ....

    However, Bobby is fantastic!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. coralineprince27 March 2014 at 17:25

    Absolutely! I mean Wow! that scream sent shivers down my spine 0.0

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jenna Crothers27 March 2014 at 17:32

    So Emma is really selfish now, like Regina or Henry (once he gets his memory's back) would want/let them leave

    ReplyDelete
  9. playdoc27 March 2014 at 17:58

    Right? I was just thinking that...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Erica Hudson27 March 2014 at 19:15

    maybe if he kills the monkey it will turn into Neal?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anna27 March 2014 at 19:33

    I don't think she's being selfish. She wants Henry to have a normal life... I for once understand her (even if I'm one of those oncers that think that Henry should stay with Regina)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jenna Crothers27 March 2014 at 20:13

    The reason I think it's selfish is because Emma dosn't want Henry to be mad at her again, like he was before he was kidnapped for lying about his father, why she didn't just tell him and her parents the truth about Neal is her own problem but if Henry finds out she was planning on leaving THIER whole family behind and leave him with his true memories he's going to be super mad. Normal isn't thier family and it seems Emma's the only one with a problem with that.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anna27 March 2014 at 21:31

    She never said anything about Henry being mad at her, she said "A week ago Henry and I were playing video games and eating fruit rollups, now I am chasing after the dark one hoping he can help me find the wicked witch of the west,"
    She came to Storybrooke because she knew Henry would be mad at her if he remembered and if she hadn't come, but she knows that they have a good life back in NY, a life any kid should have and she knows that because she never had a good life.


    She didn't tell him and her parents about Neal because she didn't think he'd be coming back to her life. Which, let's be honest, what are the chances?

    ReplyDelete
  14. vivcious27 March 2014 at 21:39

    I don't understand how Emma is being selfish? She never asked for anything that had happened to her. All those bad things that did, it was repaid by Regina giving Henry and Emma a chance at happiness and normalcy.


    It's not like Emma and Henry going back and living in NY is a forever sort of goodbye. Not this time around. You do know family members grow up and can move away? But they can visit anytime they can?


    (And let's be real, in the real world Emma WOULD move back to NY. But this is television. You can't very well have a show about fairytales when the main character lives a regular joe life.)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Jenna Crothers27 March 2014 at 23:20

    Emma has had a shitty life, she never asked for any of it to happen, who would? An it was really nice of Regina to give her those memories but there fake, lies, she made the choices that led her to the life she was living, but it was her choice, you have to live with the decisions you make, there consequences. An her family is trapped in storybrook, being turned into flying monkeys if they try to leave, would Henry get his memories back or would she let him live a lie in New York . any hoo, they will stay in stroybrook, with there family, Henry will get his memories back and the drama will continue, like what if Regina finds out Emma wants to leave with Henry (without his memories) after this curse...

    ReplyDelete
  16. Bruce_F27 March 2014 at 23:21

    "I don't understand how Emma is being selfish?"


    Simple. Any time that Emma doesn't prioritize Regina above all else in her decision-making process, Emma is instantly regarded as a horrible shrew.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Michu194528 March 2014 at 07:20

    It's small town. What have you expected? Chasing him for 3 episodes?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Katerina2228 March 2014 at 13:08

    "It was hard.Henry makes it complicated,it's not just about me.HE is hoping Gold can help bring his memories back."



    Odds are that the HE Emma is talking about is Neal.Which means that they've already reunited(perhaps with Henry as well).So I don't think the flying monkey can be Neal.Unless whoever gets turned can change back and forth at will,but I doubt this is the case.

    ReplyDelete
  19. ouathebest28 March 2014 at 13:37

    But....at Emma and David matter something that Rumpel is still alive, or the only thing that matters to them is that they use it to get to the wicked witch? o.o

    ReplyDelete
  20. Marysocontrary28 March 2014 at 20:02

    Apparently Walsh could. It may depend on how they were transformed originally. If she cast a spell to transform him, then maybe he has control. And those that were transformed by a bite, can't. We'll have to wait and see.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Marysocontrary28 March 2014 at 20:04

    Are you talking about how Emma asked if Rumple knew where the Wicked Witch is? You do realize that it's important to know that in that moment if she is close by, ready to attack them or if they have a chance to get him to safety.

    ReplyDelete
  22. playdoc29 March 2014 at 00:45

    I've no idea, but I'm looking forward to this upcoming episode.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Sara29 March 2014 at 01:14

    Kidnapping Regina's son again isn't exactly selfless...

    ReplyDelete
  24. Bruce_F29 March 2014 at 01:20

    If I gave this comment the severe eye-roll it deserved I'd end up with a migraine headache.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Sara29 March 2014 at 01:28

    I feel the same. There's only so much anti-adoption bullshit I can take.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Sara29 March 2014 at 01:30

    I'm really enjoying the Emma/Charming relationship growing in season 3, it makes up for how badly they've mangled Snow/Emma relationship. But I'm growing SO tired of Emma pretending that taking Henry away from his mother is a good idea and over Rumple's crazy. It's very tiring.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Dahne29 March 2014 at 01:35

    I have no stake in this argument because I dropped OUaT when they didn't just leave Henry in the well/cave/tunnel/or whatever it was I was hoping he'd be stuck in partway through season 1. However in the episodes that I watched I was appalled by how anti-adoption it was. It's one of the reasons why I hated Emma and could not watch the show anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Bruce_F29 March 2014 at 01:41

    This has nothing to do with adoption and everything to with inanely jumping to 'kidnapping' at the mere mention of Emma considering living anywhere besides Storybrooke.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Ron29 March 2014 at 01:53

    But his life wasnt normal to begging with (or well as normal as a Cursed town would give) the memories he has and her has, those were memories that Regina put into them, once Henry starts to remember i doubt he will go with Emma leaving his adoptive mom and his grandpas the point of all this show is being witha family and i dont think Henry will go that easily, Emma may have a point but i wont work.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Lucas Treinier30 March 2014 at 13:21

    So happy that Rumple is back! It's strange didn't David lost his sword in the previous episode ???

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anna31 March 2014 at 01:47

    I doubt it too, but I was just saying I don't think she's selfish for trying to give him a normal life.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Anna31 March 2014 at 01:50

    Please, Emma and Regina passed that "anti-adoption" shit a long time ago...

    ReplyDelete
  33. Sara31 March 2014 at 01:51

    It's a kid that isn't hers. Taking him away without talking to his parent is abduction.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Sara31 March 2014 at 01:51

    lol. That's funny.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 01:55

    Biology and basic law would beg to differ.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Sara31 March 2014 at 01:56

    lol, wut? That doesn't even make sense.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 01:57

    That explains a lot,

    ReplyDelete
  38. Sara31 March 2014 at 01:58

    Not really because Henry is not legally Emma's. Taking a child anywhere, even when you have rights to them without the permission of the other parent is illegal. Parents with much more legal right than Emma are arrested and charged with abduction every day. THAT'S basic law.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 01:59

    I wouldn't bring all that legality into this. If Emma ever wanted to contest that adoption, especially in Storybrooke, it would collapse like rickety Jenga tower.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:03

    But what's she going to say? It was a legal adoption out of Storybrooke and she actually signed all her rights away. So it's lucky nobody in New York checked during the year because even if she had memories of it, it wasn't real. You're the one that brought up the law and the law is not on Emma's side. Her doing anything with Henry without Regina's permission is abduction. So Emma could contest it in Storybrooke and they'd be all "joint custody, whatever" but if she left Storybrooke it would only take one phone call to have her arrested. Henry would go into the system before he went to Emma.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 02:07

    When you introduce a locker full of hearts, a murdered Sheriff, a hostage held for decades as leverage, and the plethora of people out for her head into evidence, no judge in their right mind would let Regina anywhere near a child. Outside of Storybrooke, good luck trying to prove that Regina should have any rights to Henry when she's been MIA for a year while the boy has been living with her mother and going to school in NYC. Either way, she's not keeping Henry if the courts get involved.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:11

    Lol. What? Neither of those make any sense at all. In Storybrooke murder is the most common form of death so I doubt a judge would do anything about it, considering Regina is still the mayor of the town even with full knowledge of who she is.

    And likewise, the parent of the abducted child is usually not punished because she couldn't locate the child. Even if Regina didn't keep Henry, Emma wouldn't either because in the eyes of the real world she's not his parent. He'd go into foster care.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 02:14

    You can't have it both ways. You either invoke the legal system or you don't. Legally, Regina is screwed. Henry wasn't abducted and good luck trying to prove he was when the mother didn't alert authorities, didn't issue an amber alert, didn't attempt any contact with her son, and fell of the grid herself completely.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:16

    Well, legally, HENRY is screwed. Emma would never get to keep him after a call to New York authorities.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 02:19

    They'd have no reason not to.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:19

    No reason not to what?

    ReplyDelete
  47. Anna31 March 2014 at 02:22

    Yeah? like the fact that Regina let Emma get away with Henry and gave them good memories? Or the fact that Emma lets Regina babysit Henry even when she's just Madam Mayor for him?

    ReplyDelete
  48. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 02:23

    They'd have no reason not to let Emma keep him just as she has been.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:23

    This episode literally had Emma saying she wanted to take Henry back to New York. Where his actual mother DOES NOT LIVE.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:25

    That's...not how the law works. When they find that a woman has been living with a child for a year that she's not the guardian or parent of, the person goes to jail. Of all the things without legal precedent on OUAT, THIS actually DOES have legal precedent. It's actually pretty common. It ends in jail time and foster care.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 02:27

    A.) She is a parent. B.) Once the authorities asked why Regina is just now getting around to this after an entire year then tries to explain herself and then cannot it will be all downhill for Regina from there.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Anna31 March 2014 at 02:28

    Because she wants what's best for him. And Regina agrees with that (with what's best for Henry...)

    ReplyDelete
  53. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:32

    a) Emma is a birth parent, yes. But she gave up legal rights to Henry. They've said so on the show.

    b) The actual law says differently but okay. Regina could just as easily say she allowed Henry to live with Emma but she revokes her permission.

    A few google searches about Parent Child Abduction should clear up the issues you're having.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:33

    I doubt Regina would agree to losing her child again when it wasn't 100% necessary just because it would make it easier for Emma.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 02:34

    "Regina could just as easily say she allowed Henry to live with Emma but she revokes her permission."

    And when the authorities decide to investigate? That's not going to hold up.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:34

    And what would they find when they investigate?

    ReplyDelete
  57. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 02:36

    That not one single person or shred of evidence would corroborate her story.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:38

    Yet the evidence they'd still be left with is a) Regina is the parent b) Emma gave up her rights to him and c) Emma took him.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 02:42

    C would never be proven and this:

    "It might not be enough to get Henry back to Regina but it would
    definitely be enough to send Emma to jail and Henry to the foster
    system."

    Is what amounts to mutually assured destruction. Poof. Her relationship with Henry is destroyed along with any traction she's gained with the people of Storybrooke, which means it would never ever happen. So, if she goes that route she's just as screwed.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Anna31 March 2014 at 02:44

    Going to NYC doesn't make it 'easier' for Emma, but for Henry: he was friends and by everything Emma says, he HAS a good life.


    I'm going to stop replying. Because this is pointless. I love Regina and I'm actually one of the oncers that say that Henry is rightfully hers. I just think that Emma is not completely mistaken about this decision.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:45

    It's not going to happen, it's just hypothetical to show that Emma taking Henry back to New York without his mother's permission is abduction. Circumstances actually don't matter.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:46

    I don't think Emma is mistaken. Just selfish. OUAT is the most anti-adoption show I've ever watched and they've only made it worse with the 3A finale.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 02:48

    To prove abduction they'd have to investigate and if they investigate, especially if they start interviewing people, it's going to be bad for Regina and assuredly good for Emma. If push came to shove, everyone would back one side over the other and we know it wouldn't be Regina.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Anna31 March 2014 at 02:48

    How can she be selfish when she's doing it for Henry?! Arrrg... Nevermind.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:51

    Because she's not. If the option to restore his memories and reunite him with his mother exists and she didn't take it, she'd be doing Henry a HUGE disservice.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Sara31 March 2014 at 02:55

    LOL. To prove abduction they look at Emma's legal standing. There is literally NOTHING that will make it look good for Emma. She gave up all parental rights to Henry so her living with him is illegal. That's it. That's the thing.

    It doesn't matter AT ALL who sides with whom. Parents have gone to jail after decades of raising children with hundreds of 'they're such a good parent though!' because they had no legal right to the children.

    The law doesn't support your arguments at all. I mean, there are dozens upon dozens of cases with examples every year. There's one in the newspaper almost weekly.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Bruce_F31 March 2014 at 03:05

    Now it's my turn to say "that's not how the law works." There's nothing that WON'T be in Emma's favor, starting with asking Henry questions about Regina who, as far as he's concerned, he's never met until a few days ago in this scenario. Then there's corroboration that's impossible. Anyone they interview would say that Regina sent him away with Emma willfully.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.