Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Review of Elementary Episode 2.14 "Dead Clade Walking": "Dinosaur Act"


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Review of Elementary Episode 2.14 "Dead Clade Walking": "Dinosaur Act"

Feb 1, 2014

Share on Reddit


 
Elementary returns with a paleontology-themed episode: murder motivated by a controversy over whether dinosaurs may have survived the extinction event that supposedly wiped them out ("dead clade walking" referring to such a survival by a group of creatures). The fossil of a nanotyrannosaurus that may date from after the formation of the K-T Boundary (marking the end of the Mesozoic Era and supposedly the extinction of land dinosaurs) has been discovered. Its existence wold prove that dinosaurs survived their supposed mass extinction. Would opponents of the "dead clade walking" argument be willing to kill and to destroy the fossil in order to maintain the paleontological status quo? Yes, apparently they would, as Holmes (Johnny Lee Miller) and Watson (Lucy Liu) discover. But really, who cares? Since the case emerges from the cold case files Holmes gave Watson to practice on, even the original murder here is more of historic than immediate interest. As usual, what matters is not so much the crime as how it symbolically ties in to what's going on with Holmes.

Is it any surprise that an episode focusing specifically on the burden of the past--the cold cases Holmes couldn't solve, in this specific case because his drug addiction affected his work--ends up being about the disposition of a fossil? Watson digs the old file out of a trunk; the fossil is dug out of a rock. But whereas the fossil is destroyed, justice is restored, in that the case is solved. The cold cases are metaphorical skeletons in the closet as well as relics of the past, evidence of an unpleasant truth that can be hard to face. Indeed, the idea of the pressure of the hidden burden runs through the episode, which begins with Holmes considering trepanning himself (a running gag is that every time he sets up his drill to do a practice run on the skull he has--another significant bone in this episode--something interrupts him) and ends with him offering to trepan Watson since she helped solve the case. Trepanning is the process of drilling a hole into the skull to facilitate medical treatment, including releasing pressure on the brain. (Note: self-trepanning would be low on the list of recommended home remedies.) That Holmes is considering such a thing speaks to the undercurrents simmering within his consciousness, which we have seen raised before.

The case isn't the only skeleton, though. We learn of another amusing one when one of Holmes's apparently endless series of consultant experts turns out not only to be an auctioneer who can help Holmes find out who might be involved in the fossil black market but also Holmes's dirty pen pal. Holmes, we learn, has a steamy correspondence with this woman (a much older woman, I am happy to report; it's always nice to see recognition of the continued sexuality of those over middle age), conducted apparently in the old-fashioned way (paper) rather than through modern twists such as sexting. (Since this auctioneer is played by Jane Alexander, there's a good chance we'll see her again, though her recurring role on The Blacklist might keep her from being available.) It's a minor secret, to be sure, and hardly even the weirdest thing Holmes does or considers in this episode (in addition to self-trepanning, Holmes also considers eating evidence in the hope that, like planarian worms, he will be able literally to digest the information that way), but it does resonate with another, more significant skeleton in Holmes's metaphorical closet. He has, after all, had another female correspondent/lover.

Holmes's ner role as AA sponsor for Randy (Stephen Tyrone Williams) assumes importance here. Randy risks falling back into old habits--fossilizing, rather than evolving--when a former lover, the one who turned him on to drugs, comes back into his life. Holmes's experiences with Moriarty (Natalie Dormer) clearly inform his advice to Randy to leave the past behind, though Miller superbly performs Holmes's own difficulties in doing so himself. That he sees echoes of his situation with Moriarty--a kind of addiction herself, for him--in Randy's is evident from Miller's expressions and body language. Moriarty is clearly still the huge skeleton in Holmes's closet, though her reappearance this season has recently been ruled out, due to other commitments (and sadly for Elementary fans, who will have to settle for her role in Game of Thrones for their Natalie Dormer fix). That Holmes has become willing to dig in with living people and try to help them, instead of limiting himself to the dead, is a notable development in his character, though it may also suggest the reason for his sense of increased burden and pressure. Regardless, Holmes is not willing to leave Randy to gather dust, as he did with the cold cases; he won't fossilize. Interestingly, as Watson becomes more like him, Holmes is becoming somewhat more like her, assuming sober coach responsibilities as she assumes detective duties. This is amusingly reflected early in the episode, when her case-related interests tempt Holmes away from Randy, a temptation he resists. Nevertheless, he and Watson eventually manage to pin the blame for the crime on a paleontologist who would suffer professional embarrassment and lost book sales should the "dead clade walking" theory bear out. Watch out for those murderous academic types!

So, in short, murder plot is nothing memorable, but the Watson/Holmes dynamic progresses another step forward. How did YOU like the episode? Let me know in the comments below.

19 comments:

  1. Fabulous review! I love how you tease out the skeleton parallels - I totally went to the hidden skeletons in the closet and the fossil of the cold case too. The number of parallels and echos underscore what a clever show this can be. The trepanning obsession was hilarious... I was pleased to see that Holmes didn't immediately get swallowed by guilt when Randy lapsed, but just took him off to a meeting. He is definitely learning and growing - which I think he is quite generous in frequently acknowledging to Watson. Have we seen her be equally thankful to him for what he's taught her? I don't think we have yet - perhaps that is something to look forward to... Also, as a fancier of puns, I'm sure you quite enjoyed Holmes meeting Gaye....

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Lisa, another excellent review. Though, I've come to the conclusion that no mystery can fascinate you anymore, lol. It was definitely a dull case when it comes to buildup, but for some reason I found it interesting, probably because of its highly scientific nature (and I love paleontology as a science, even though I am not an expert at all).

    But, as you mentioned, the importance of the case was once again the ties to what was happening with Holmes in the episode. You brilliantly mentioned how the skeleton fossil mirrored the hidden skeletons of Holmes's past and I think they've addressed his continued struggle with addiction (both to drugs and, in a way, Moriarty) very wisely.

    "Holmes's experiences with Moriarty (Natalie Dormer) clearly inform his advice to Randy to leave the past behind, though Miller superbly performs Holmes's own difficulties in doing so himself."
    One of the reasons I love Miller's Sherlock Holmes, he is so fantastic in not just playing an iconic character, but also showing his nature as an ex-addict.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you--though point taken about my tendency not to find the supposed main plots all that intriguing! I think I can still find mysteries/procedurals fascinating, and this one did actually appeal to me by virtue of its improbable focus on paleontology and murder--not, one would thnk, normally a discipline to lead to such behaviour! However, the show has been drifting away (imo) from really focusing on the deductive/procedural aspects of things. It's been a long time (to my recollection, anyway) since we've reen Holmes really engage in one of his bravura analyses of a scene to figure out the evidence. This episode dealt mor ein using contacts, slogging through things, and so on, rather than on showcasing Holmes's (and Watson's developing) deductive abilities. I long fo ascene where we see Sherlock in a room or at a crime scene and just banging through all the subtle things he sees. (Maybe because I've been watching Sherlock lately, which has more of that sort of thing--not that I'm trying to set up a compare/contrast here, siding with one version or the other; I enjoy both!)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you. I agree that Holmes's response to Randy, especially after the lapse, was a great instance to show us how he's changing, even if he doesn't think he is. And no, I'm not recalling any Watson thanking Holmes moments off the top of my head.
    Yes, I did enjoy Gay, especially the punning. Given that there can't be many cases requiring an expert paleontologist, I doubt we'll see her again, but she was fun. I also liked that she would appear to be Watson's first cultivated expert, though Watson has a ways to go to get her number of specialists she can consult with up to Holmes's inexhaustible supply of them!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Funny how nobody mentions the fact that the trunk was a gift to Watson and a chance for her to learn and gain independence and confidence with detective work. Just another sign that this season has been extremely unbalanced and Watson is not a character on her own anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Miller is fantastic! He brings so much depth to his portrayal - definitely the thing that hooked me. I've grown to really love Lui as Watson too. I think it's hard to write a mystery worthy of Sherlock Holmes because nobody else is that smart!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have to disagree about Watson this season. I do agree she's been more in the background than I'd like to see, but she has been growing as a character and healing in her own right. We see her gaining expertise in this new career and starting to heal in her personal life too as she seeks a romantic connection. I love the moments when Watson can now surprise Sherlock - I think it's more believable if she moves slowly from student to partner.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think you are forgetting the fact that even though Watson has been mastering the art of deduction as much as Sherlock, she still doesn't have the experience that Sherlock has after years of being a consultant detective. I think the writers have shown adequately how much she can be Sherlock's equal. (though, I'm all for turning the focus on her more, I love her)

    If anything, I believe that Elementary has done a far better job than other versions of Sherlock Holmes in showing Watson as a complex character on her own, instead of just a sidekick.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Since the case emerges from the cold case files Holmes gave Watson to practice on,"....

    ReplyDelete
  10. Likewise. Initially, the idea of a female Watson was a key reason why I didn't even watch the show when it began (not it being Lucy Liu, particularly; though nothing about the choice of her grabbed me, I had no particular distaste for her specifically). Fortunately, my in-laws do watch it and we saw an episode when we were visiting them. The rest is history....

    ReplyDelete
  11. Not my point. She will never be the genius detective Holmes is (and Lucy Liu confirms this in her interviews). What I'm saying is: the trunk was a gift to stimulate her independence in the work. Every apprentice needs to work alone. Making Sherlock take the lead and solve the case -- especially in this situation -- is not a good development. She needs to make mistakes and struggle with her career in a constant arc. This development needs to be present in every episode, just like Holmes' addiction and Holmes' relationship with Moriarty is.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'd have no objection to more Watson (and more Bell and Gregson, for that matter), but I'd have to say that so far Elementary has presented one of the most fully-realized and complex Watsons in the Holmes canon. Watson is usually little more than a glorified sidekick, though the Nigel Bruce comic relief version is a rather extreme version of that. But Holmes will almost always be the primary figure in a Sherlock Holmes story. That said, episodic TV does provide more room for different levels of emphasis in individual episodes. I've said before (in this post, even) that I'd like to see more of Gregson and Bell, who have both been given some heavier focus in a few episodes; a Watson-centric episode or three would also be wonderful to see. I'd have anticipated more Watson upon Moriarty's return, given the groundwork laid last time we saw her, but we know now that that won't be happening again any time soon, sadly.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Terrific review! I agreed that the case this week wasn't the show's most compelling, but the Holmes/Watson interactions were wonderful. :)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thanks--and agreed!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I agree with you 100%. The story was not the most memorable, but the Holmes/Watson relationship/dynamic/thingy has moved ahead another tiny click which is what matters the most!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thanks! I love being agreed with!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I find this episode distasteful, primarily because of the seemingly "scientific" story around which it revolves. All it does is mock real science with weak arguments and misinformation, and the occasional pseudo-science ideas presented as interesting by Holmes (the one with the worms is the most laughable).
    Something to be noted would be the weak logic involved, as in the case of why did the killer destroy the fossil, because it would lead to him not selling books (wtf?!), considering that if he would have managed to sell the artifact, selling/writing books would turn into a distracting activity, and not income source.
    I seriously hope they stop making flimsy scripts.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I'd be interested in more details about the inaccuracy and misinformation. Given that your dismissal of the worm story as the most laughable itself kind of oversimplifies what science has to say about the possibility of memory transfer (and--I think, anyway--misses the point of it as a joke), I'd be curious about more specific details.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.