Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Supernatural – Episode 9.12 – Sharp Teeth – Review


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Supernatural – Episode 9.12 – Sharp Teeth – Review

31 Jan 2014

Share on Reddit
One of my least favorite guest characters on Supernatural came back into the Winchesters’ lives this week amongst Sam and Dean fighting, a cringe-worthy uncomfortable brother scene, and monologuing monsters.

Now for the shocker – I didn’t totally hate it, at least not on the second watch, and I even enjoyed the Garth part on the first. There are some things that the episode did well, which I’ll go more into further down, and some things that it did poorly. Some of what appeared to be major issues on a first watch made more sense and worked better for me on a second, and I’m a sucker for an emotionally meaty episode, even if it’s dark and messy – and in this case more implied than delivered.

So let’s start with the big conversation, and this falls into that category of parts that made more sense on the second watch than the first. On the first watch I was pulling my hair out at the lack of elaboration with Sam’s final comment, “I’m saying, you wanna work? Let’s work. If you wanna be brothers, well, those are my terms.” I have no issue with Sam being mad. Sam should be mad. What I had an issue with was what seems to be a sloppy habit of several writers on this show avoiding writing difficult dialogue by just not writing it. Sam’s train of thought doesn’t make much sense and he doesn’t elaborate.

But on reflection, I got over the maddening lack of clarity and focused on a thought that formed in the first watch, but became clearer in the rewatch, and that Sam wasn’t cutting off ties with Dean. He wasn’t the one to walk away this time. He forces himself on Dean during the search for Garth. He doesn’t quickly jump out of the car when Dean drives him back to his car. He doesn’t close the door to the idea of hunting together. In fact, if he were really moving on, Sam would have probably dropped hunting once he separated from Dean. What he does is allow continued communication, but with setting the condition that change is needed. He lets Dean know that he’s angry and not ready to trust yet, he’s not okay with Dean’s behavior, and he won’t go back to pretending that there’s a relationship there unless things change. We’ve seen the brothers at odds many times in the past, but things felt different this time. Sam seemed more serious about sticking to his resolve.

I took Sam’s comment that they wouldn't be family as a tie back to often repeated theme that originated with Bobby, but has been repeated in many forms since, and that is the question, what constitutes family? Bobby’s comment was that family doesn’t end with blood. You can take that one step further and say that blood doesn’t equal family. In fact, I believe in season 6, Dean said as much to Samuel Campbell. By saying they won’t be brothers, Sam is saying it’s the relationship that equals family – he’s not saying that family is bad – and he’s saying their relationship is broken. He’s not severing all communication, but he’s forcing change.

There were issues in this episode that I had trouble getting past. One was that while I can make the place where Sam landed work in my head, I feel like we fast-forwarded past the various stages in his reaction. I alluded to this a couple of weeks ago, in commenting that Sam seemed to jump past the stages of processing betrayal in a little over two minutes. Last week we saw Sam in pain – both physical and emotional – but we haven’t really seen Sam angry yet, and I need to see Sam angry to process this. It’s too late now, but this has been a major weak spot in this story, as has been the fact that the overly generic writing of the offense to Sam. Sam has a lot of personal history that directly relates to possession, but the theme of last week’s pain-fest – “it’s on me” – could have been said by Dean (and in fact was said by Dean this week), or Cas, or any other character that’s ever felt guilt. This week, with Sam and Dean reunited, we had another opportunity for the two to dig into their unique history, but we didn’t get it. This is the third episode in which Sam knew about the Gadreel possession, and we still have yet to hear anything about this that is about Sam.

Another issue I had while watching was that I had to keep reminding myself why Dean seemed angry and was trying to dump Sam throughout the whole hunt. I had to think back to realize that Dean wasn’t really angry, and his behavior stemmed from his notion that he’s poison to those around him. But then, if he’s in that state of mind, why was he the one at the end to suggest that the two could get past this? The writing around this seemed inconsistent.

Highlights

The story starts with both Sam and Dean separately and unintentionally meeting up at Garth’s bedside after Garth lands in the hospital. Garth gives them the slip, and they trace him to his new wife’s home, and learn that he has been turned into a werewolf, and has married into a hymn-singing, animal-heart-eating werewolf clan.

The Good

A good episode ties the Monster of the Week case with the soap opera that is Sam and Dean’s lives. What I alluded to earlier – the message about family not being about blood, but rather about the quality of the relationships – was mirrored in Garth’s new family. The family on the surface seemed strong, and even prayed together, and had a rich blood history. But the blood wasn’t enough. The family was broken, as the Winchester family is broken. There was even the parallel of the mother having been killed by a hunter, as Mary was killed by a demon.

Another plus for me was that although Garth has not been my favorite character, and his episodes are ones that I don’t go back to rewatch, for the first time I didn’t find Garth annoying. He seemed toned down this week, which I liked.

There were also some very good and funny moments with Sam and Dean on the hunt, among them Sam slapping Garth after being horrified that Dean was ready to shoot him up with adrenaline, and Sam trapping Dean in a lie about the finding nothing on Garth from the video footage. Yes, they know each other well.

Dean’s dinner with the werewolf clan was an entertaining scene. And seeing Sam and Dean back in middle-America countryside felt like a return to the older episodes that featured Sam and Dean on the road.

The Bad

I’ve already covered a lot of what I didn’t like about the Sam and Dean parts above, so I won’t repeat myself. but I do have a couple of things to add.

The writer for this episode, Adam Glass, is notorious for focusing more on Dean over Sam, and knocking Sam out or having him leave the room when it’s time for interacting with the guest characters. He’s never focused an episode more on Sam than Dean - not even Like a Virgin, which was the first episode after Sam’s soul was released from Hell. And sadly, this episode didn’t surprise.

Glass is also known for some really out-of-character and sometimes very damaging writing of Sam and Dean. The latest addition was Sam’s comment linking Dean talking him out of finishing the trials with his trust issues. Dean didn’t trick Sam in that instance, and Sam would know that. Sam’s comment was poorly stated, which is out of character because Sam is very capable at articulating his thoughts. The guy was training to become at lawyer at Stanford at one time.

On the mytharc side, there was inconsistency in the writing of werewolves, including adding a new ability to change when they’re angry. I’m aware is something that has already been hashed over in depth in the fandom, so I’ll leave it at that.

But what bothered me more (I’ve given up respect for monster canon as a lost cause) was the improbability that with the ever-increasing library of knowledge Sam and Dean have gained access to over the years, that if there was anything left to learn about werewolves, it would have been known by now. Just last week we learned that the Men of Letters knew secrets about angels, their grace, and their vessels, even though angels were hidden from mankind for thousands of years. But Sam and Dean haven’t heard of hunters coming across werewolf purebreds? You can’t have it both ways. You can’t have Sam and Dean finding secrets about Eve, the Mother of All Monsters, in the Campbell family library, but being unaware that there were families like Garth’s new inlaws – creatures hunters have been killing and documenting for centuries.

So what were your thoughts on the episode? Hit or miss?

84 comments:

  1. The show added new mythology about purebloods last season, they have more control and are able to change before, during and after the lunar cycle. But they did learn about purebloods, or at least people turned within 4 generations by purebloods from John's journal last season.

    Not knowing about born werewolves doesn't stretch credulity, they really don't need to do any research on werewolves, because you find out about a wolf and go out kill it with silver, that's really all you need to know.

    I mean you could say Dean should have known about vampires in season 1, given his time hunting with John and access to his journal.



    Also, they never found out about Eve from the Campbell library, they were able to steal the book that belonged to the dragons, and Bobby was able to translate it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. First of all I want to say that MOTW episodes are my favourites; each episode is like a little film; monster, research brothers hunting together in the Impala, so I have nothing against this ep for its format.
    However, SPN is supposed to be a horror-oriented show and honestly this episode was as bland as it comes.
    The writing was just infantile.

    The story of a hunter bitten by a werewolf who finds true love and family with the sweetet female were-wolf on the planet, the wicked step-mother and two ugly 'step-brothers' who try to ruin this idyllic life, but it all ends happily ever after.
    It's like Glass was writing a fairy story for his kids.
    x

    If we compare this to the Madison episode and lay them side by side, the huge difference in the quality of the writing ( and acting ) is clear.
    x

    The were wolf lore is just an ongong example of how these writers throw stuff in to cover their individual stories, with no thought at all at how they are mixing up any ground-rules that were put down before.
    If it suited them, they would probably come up with the idea that no, salt doesn't harm demons after all; that was all a misunderstanding!
    x

    Don't quite agree about family not being about blood at least in the case of the Winchesters, as I've yet to see Sam or Dean actually sacrificing their lives for anyone else other than each other, so that doesn't ring quite true, when they spout it, especially Dean.

    x

    As for Sam and Dean. let's be honest, neither, no matter what comes out of their mouths is happy when they are apart. They writers have allowed Dean to put his feeling into words often, but Sam is denied the right to show his love for his brother because of Carve's wish to put an end to the 'unhealthy' co-dependency , but Sam too, despite his objections is eternally pulled back to his brother like a magnet.
    It's not surprising. they ARE in an unhealthy relationship, but that's the show and that's why I and many others watch.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sam: Hey, check this out. "Werewolves that are turned up to four generations from pureblood..." Think he means Alpha? [SAM gestures noncommittally.] "...are less feral and can transform before, during, and after the lunar cycle." Boom. Purebloods don't black out during the transformation. They can control themselves.

    The show is allowed to add on to the existing mythology. It's been done before, with reapers in season 2.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Of course they are, but it has to be introduced in a logical way.
    What you quote is taken from "Bitten" I believe, and i remember at the time there was a difference of opinion on that too when it was introduced because it seemed to have been thrown in just to accomodate the story of the three teens.
    x
    My point is that were-wolves are basic monster lore. Hundreds of pages have been written about them. Is it possible that expert hunters like the Winchesters wouldn't know everything there is to know about them?
    x
    I get the sect that follow Fenir, they might not have know about that, but it's rather unbelievable that Sam and Dean didn't know the basics.
    Then poor Sam had to kill Madison because she was a feral newly turned Were-wolf but Garth was also newly -turned. How come he has such great control?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes it is possible, because there is lots of lore on any type monster, some which would contradicts others, like vampires. A werewolf is not a vampire, if hunter comes across one the first thing he or she is going to do is put a bullet in it's heart not talk to it about it's history.

    Of course it was added to accommodate the story, that's the point of trying to expand the lore. It was done no less logically than the reaper stuff in season 2.

    For one Madison chose to die, they laid it out for her that she could lock herself up on the full moon, but there's always a chance she could bust out. So she decides she doesn't want to risk hurting anymore people and asks Sam to kill her. As for Garth, easiest one is he's within four generations of a pureblood. But also his personality might have something to do with it, werewolves basically id gone wild, subconscious anger/desires/fear brought forth. And Garth isn't an angry guy, doesn't hold grudges, plus it helps he never got a taste for human hearts.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The new Supernatural drinking game. Every time the writers piss all over previously established canon you take a shot.

    ReplyDelete
  7. add to that every time Sam gets hit over the head and everytime Sam has to leave the room/scene so Dean can have a special moment with someone.

    ReplyDelete
  8. No writer this season other than Carver in the premier has actually written Sam this season as a character in his own right, plot device yes but not actually for Sam. There have been no Sam centric episodes outside of the premier which was a 3 way split with Dean/Cas/Sam all having an equal(ish) share of the episode. All we've had in regards to Sam all season is a few lines here and there and rather incoherent recently at that. There is too much having to read between the lines, too much left open to interpretation which in this fandom basically means people are going to think the worst. I can try to work through Sam's storyline myself using what little we've actually had on the show and what Jared has tried to tell us but is it would be is guessing.
    Carver's lack of interest in Sam is disconcerting for a Sam fan but I guess no one really cares because ratings are doing well and Jared's too nice to complain. I look forward to next weeks episode and I hope that whoever wrote it just writes a MOTW episode and completely ignores the brothers conflict, anything that has happened so far this season and just writes it as a one off episode where they hunt. I'm not interested in delving into Sam and Dean beyond that anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  9. They learned that the ashes of the Phoenix can kill Eve from Campbell's book in the episode where they traveled to the old west. I found that strange that the info should be there since it had been said that Eve hadn't been out of Purgatory in tens of thousands of years. How would humans know about her, let alone know how to kill her?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'd like to think that their shared experiences growing up, rather than blood, was the real bond. Anway, I think Sam was pointing out that the brother part is pretty empty if there's not trust, and it's a point Dean needed to hear then.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yeah I do have to laugh at that .

    ReplyDelete
  12. Chris, I think your breakdown of that final scene was pretty spot on. If Sam was truly done with Dean, he wouldn't have chosen to even go hunting with him. He's giving him the opportunity to make this up to him, which is the mature thing to do. He's not ready to give up on Dean just yet, he just wants to see evidence that Dean is willing to work towards earning his forgiveness. Carver not giving us at least one episode focusing on Sam's POV after Gadreel is a mistake though. It's hard enough for people who don't know what makes Sam tick as a character to understand him as it is, and it's really hard when the dialogue is cryptic.


    I'm gonna have to be honest here and point out that there was something in this episode that really didn't sit right with me and I think that Adam Glass probably shouldn't have gone there. In the scene in the hospital when Garth was in the bathroom and the boys were talking about what they were doing for the past couple of weeks, when Sam mentions the leftover grace from Gadreel, Dean points out how wrong that sounds. That to me was borderline rape humor and it just seemed pretty tasteless. A lot of people have pointed out the connotations involved in a forced possession storyline, so for Dean to be cracking jokes about how "wrong" it sounds when a substance was left behind after Sam's autonomy was violated seemed rather crass. It also makes it sound as if Dean doesn't get how much of an issue this is for Sam, especially given his role in the possession. I'm ready to take a beating in the votes for that opinion, but I'm fine with that. I'm sticking by my guns and saying that I didn't care for that exchange because I didn't find it to be funny.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Do you think that maybe the introduction of new lore on werewolves might be foreshadowing about the spinoff series? In the descriptions they released this week they're talking about a monster family working in conjunction with hunters. I found this to be interesting. Maybe there are second or third generation werewolf characters in the spinoff and this is how they're incorporating it into the mythology. It's just a thought that I had.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I completely agree with you. Sam seems as if he's sick of Dean using the word "family" as a blanket excuse to get away with whatever he feels is justifiable because he has good intentions. And we all know what the road to hell is paved with. Making Sam's decisions for him isn't showing trust or faith, it's akin to him saying "I know what's best for you because I'm your big brother and you should do whatever I say is right." Sam is a 30 year old man. He wants to be treated as an adult, and even more than that, he wants to be treated as an equal. In the first half of the season, Sam was under the impression that Dean was treating him as an equal and I think that meant a great deal to him. Once he found out about the possession, he realized that the solidarity he and Dean shared was only an illusion. Dean had, in fact been continuing to make all of his decisions for him and really wasn't treating him as an equal at all. So I believe that he's giving Dean the opportunity to make up for that now. Establishing boundaries between them is his way of allowing Dean to prove to him that he is willing to let Sam be his own man and work towards building a healthier relationship with one another.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yes to all you said here. The comment rubbed me the wrong way too, but I guess I just moved on quickly because I'm just hearing that type of dialogue on this show. In season 7 the rape references were coming nonstop. I agree - Dean not getting what an issue this is for Sam is part of the problem - which is why they need conversation.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The thing with Jared is he likes getting the chance play Sam differently, So for all intents and purposes he's pretty happy with what he gets to do with the character on the show.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This didn't piss on canon anymore than reapers suddenly being able to change there appearances/perception in season 2.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Eh, that's one of those things you just kind of have to go with. It's like how they are able to find out how to kill gods.


    With werewolves they never had any reason to do more research and see if they can be born.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I really wish the writers would articulate Sam's feelings the way you did. Honestly, I have no idea why Sam thinks his relationship is broken. I understand him being upset that Dean allowed an angel to possess him, but I guess that doesn't equate - in my eyes - to their relationship being fundamentally broken.


    However, you stated a position for Sam very well. I wish the writers would do the same. There is far too much guessing, assuming, wanking, and speculating when it comes to Sam, IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Carver not giving us at least one episode focusing on Sam's POV after Gadreel is a mistake though. It's hard enough for people who don't know what makes Sam tick as a character to understand him as it is, and it's really hard when the dialogue is cryptic.

    There is no much truth to this statement that it's ridiculous. I love the use of the word "cryptic." That is exactly how Sam's dialogue/POV comes off sometimes. It's not clear. It's cryptic. It's baffling. And it's not just one writer who does this. Many of the writers write him in this way. I truly believe none of the writers have a good handle on his character or on how he feels.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Is that new? The show has been pissing all over canon since season 4 or 5. We'd all need liver transplants if we drank to that.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I thought Andrew Dabb did a good job writing for Sam in Road Trip and Devil May Care.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Becky drug raped Sam.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I didn't find it funny either, but I thought it was IC for Dean. It was dark gallows humor.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Exactly. Sam did not want Madison to die. She wanted to die. She was going to kill herself whether he did it or not. We don't know what might have happened to Madison if she'd lived. She could have learned to control it, in time.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I've wondered about that too.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I don't think Dean is ever going to get what Sam wants until Sam tells him in plain terms, and so far, that hasn't happened.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Sam's "Head" Lucfier made some comments that inferred rape.


    "You're my little bitch in every sense of the word."


    "The rapier wit, the wittier rape."


    Stuff like that.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Ugh. I hated that story.

    ReplyDelete
  30. The hallucinations?


    I thought it was interesting. The writers basically dropped the ball right after HCW.

    ReplyDelete
  31. What if being born a werewolf is just THAT rare though? You could deduce that no encounter that they read about said anything about them being natural born. What if a lot of what they read they kind of dismissed? Like fairies for example. It's not impossible that that, even if they had heard of things like that, that they didn't believe it/couldn't be confirmed. The Men of Letters probably has things about it, but they won't necessarily read up on monsters they know how to kill efficiently.

    What if it has to be a certain generation of werewolf before a cutoff of "You can't make werewolf babies". This would explain why it's never been heard of too.

    As for Garth having control, they explained that in the episode actually. Basically for the same reason Dean could resist blood as a vampire. Or other monsters live off animals or whatever. It's willpower. I imagine being with other werewolves, that might help too.

    ReplyDelete
  32. But is it really in character for Dean, who is supposed to be feeling extremely guilty over allowing Gadreel to possess his brother? I could maybe stomach this line from Dean a few seasons ago, but now? I just feel as if it was really inappropriate.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Exactly, only an angel can kill an angel? Or Anna's description of angels being cold and emotionless. That stuff lasted a season before getting changed.

    ReplyDelete
  34. She roofied him with magic which was bad, but was anything consummated?

    ReplyDelete
  35. "The rapier wit, the wittier rape."



    That's a good disgusting line though.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I think Dean is regressing and doesn't really have a filter at the moment. That's increased over the season.

    ReplyDelete
  37. What Lala and Peter said, as well a comment from Hallucifer about spooning in the cage with Sam. I also remember there being several more casual references to rape in season 6 that weren't meant to imply actual rape, but were just part of Soulless Sam's and Dean's vocabulary. Needing a daily rape shower and stocking up on soap on a rope was one, and I remember there being others, although I can't come up with them right at the moment.

    ReplyDelete
  38. It was an interesting idea, but it needed to go somewhere, and it didn't.

    ReplyDelete
  39. The rapier wit comment was proceeded by a line by Hallucifer that he missed his "interaction" with Sam.

    ReplyDelete
  40. The difference was that gods were in contact with humans, so it's more plausible that someone at some point might have managed to kill one and tell others how it was done. Purgatory in season 6 was presented as so unreachable that even the King of Hell and angels didn't know how to get there. Eve had been locked away there for most of the span of humanity, so how would humans possibly know that she existed, let alone what her weakness was?

    ReplyDelete
  41. I agree with a lot of what you said. I understood what Sam meant, but the writing was muddy. I never liked Garth, and I still don't, but he was more low-key here.


    I was a little shocked, and confused, at Sam slapping Garth. It didn't seem IC to me. I guess it was a joke but I didn't know how to take it.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Bravo, that was a great review. You opened my eyes to some parts of the 'conversation' that I hadn't thought about. Probably because I was so annoyed they were going 'there' again.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Oh, yes, I forgot that.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I think what Sam meant by things being broken between them is the realization that Dean will always take things one step too far when it comes to him. I could be wrong about this, but when he said that they couldn't be brothers, what he was really saying is that they need to change their definition of the word because as it stands right now it's not working. Being Dean's brother can't be his entire identity, and being Sam's brother shouldn't really be Dean's. So he laid out his terms in the hopes that they could work on setting new boundaries when it comes to one another and hopefully learn a new way of defining that word that doesn't involve crossing certain lines.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Sam didn't say anything in Road Trip. I don't recall Devil May Care.

    ReplyDelete
  46. http://www.supernaturalwiki.com/index.php?title=9.02_Devil_May_Care Ep 9x02. I don't remember many episode titles lately, I had to look it up.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Angels not being interested in sex was another.

    ReplyDelete
  48. It's getting harder for me to remember the titles, esp. when I don't really like the episodes as much as I used to. The ones I enjoy, I usually remember the titles

    I don't recall Sam doing much in DMC. We did learn he still feels guilty about the Apocalypse but other than that, I don't remember him doing or saying much.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Same here. I used to be able to name all of the titles in the order they aired. Kinda petered out around season five, though.


    He didn't. IIRC, he was in trouble during that one. The scene I remember the most was the interaction between Abaddon and Dean, where she threatened to take over his body and murder women and children. She was the best thing about that ep, honestly.

    ReplyDelete
  50. But, see, I didn't really see Sam as laying out any terms. I should watch it again, but I don't remember him saying much of anything. He said the relationship was broken, and that they weren't on the same page anymore but he didn't really elaborate on what he meant and Dean didn't ask questions.

    As someone said above, it was all very cryptic, IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Haha. That was me that said that. I know it's cryptic because they're expecting us to read between the lines because of Sam's lack of POV. But that's what I implied from the scene. Everyone is going to interpret things differently, but I really think the reason why Sam fell short of explaining himself there was because he thinks that Dean's definition of family is really unhealthy for the both of them. Hopefully we'll get more in upcoming episodes that clarify his side of it but I'm not going to hold my breath because this is Carver we're talking about.

    ReplyDelete
  52. That's around the same time I lost track too. Like you, I used to be able to name the episodes in the order in which they aired. I couldn't do that now to save my life. Haha!

    That Dean/Abbadon scene was good. I do remember that girl - Tracy, I believe - making Sam feel bad, and the scene w/Gad's broken wings. That was pretty cool.

    ReplyDelete
  53. I remember the female hunter - wearing some pretty uncomfortable attire - too. Then the old hunter guy who was with her got killed, I think. He betrayed them to Abdaddon or something. I can't even remember what that episode was trying to accomplish.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Yep. That's what happened. She accused Sam of killing her family, making him feel like crap. Sam went off w/the older hunter who confessed and then got shot. The demons knocked out Sam and GadZeke appeared to save the day. GadZeke and Dean then had a conversation. I actually liked that episode. I'm not sure if it had a purpose though.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Maybe it was just trying accomplish crapping on Sam the Plot Device some more. I'm probably in the minority but I just didn't get all that excited about Jared as Zeke/Gadreel. He barely has any time as the character he's on the show to play but most of his screen time was him as someone else. Could've used some of that time to get into Sam's thoughts on his miraculous recovery. I can't recall - did Dean ever think of an explanation for why Sam went from near death to living? That's how well I remember what's gone on this year.

    ReplyDelete
  56. See that's the stuff that really irritates me about this show. They keep introducing potentially great storylines then drop them for no reason. Dean's had plenty of potentially great SLs dropped for no reason, too.

    ReplyDelete
  57. I think I recall her specifically saying they never did anything. At least she had some morals where that was concerned.

    ReplyDelete
  58. In hindsight, I couldn't agree more w/you. The first 9 or so episodes should have done a better job w/giving the audience Sam's POV but I did enjoy the Sam/GadZeke stuff. I thought Jared did a marvelous job w/it.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Yeah . . . . I don't know what that is about, but it happens frequently!

    ReplyDelete
  60. I think the terms Sam laid out were they would work together, depend on each other, but not in the same "you have to make sure you put my survival first because that's your purpose" way that Dean sees as their relationship.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Sam expelled Gadreel in Road Trip - I thought that was a great scene. And in Devil May Care he had the scene at the end with Dean about settling into the bunker. He also had the confrontation with Tracy about letting Lucifer out, although that felt underwritten.

    ReplyDelete
  62. The episode set up Abaddon as a threat and also set up Dean's dependence on "Ezekiel," and showed Dean's growing guilt and regression. It really set up quite a bit for Dean (Abaddon taunting him and likely reminding him of Hell - starting the dark path he'd take up again when he met Cain; and then the scene of him drinking at the end, which he hadn't done much of in a while).

    ReplyDelete
  63. In this case I think they said it was because Mark Pellegrino wasn't available as much as they had expected. Then I'm not sure why they started the story to begin with. I think it just made Sam into a victim, yet again.

    ReplyDelete
  64. I always try to match episode titles with numbers - I am awful at that but I keep wanting to get the hang of it, so if someone says 5x07 I will remember which episode they mean.


    I tend to remember the episode titles clearly (although not always the order they aired in) because Supernatural's titles are so distinctive. For a while the titles were so ridiculous and pop culture slanted. I'm glad this season's titles have been more low-key. Not as stylish as the titles in the early seasons (especially season 2), but not as garish as the more recent ones. I was afraid we were on our way to "Real Monster Hunters of Lawrence Kansas."

    ReplyDelete
  65. Yeah . . . I definitely wouldn't hold my breath waiting for any more explanation from Sam on his feelings. I don't even disagree w/your interpretation but I don't think Sam's words could have possibly been that clear to the character, Dean. Do you know what I mean?

    Is Dean really spending time, reflecting on Sam's words, or is he just happy they're hunting together again? Even if Dean has come to the same conclusion we have, why should he have to work that hard to get Sam's meaning? Why can't Sam just say what he wants?

    To be clear - my beef is w/the writers - Glass in particular - not Sam.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Once they established the hallucinations and gave us a sample of what had happened, they could have continued it without showing Lucifer. They could have implied his presence by having Sam zone out, seem jumpy, have him start talking to someone who wasn't there. We would have had to have Sam talking to someone (a guest, Bobby, if not Dean) so that of that was filled in.


    But the story needed to build to something, and the writers didn't seem to have a plan with it. In the end it ended up being nothing but a plot device in the Dean/Cas fight. Breaking the wall was the biggest source of their conflict, and fixing it was the path to their reconciliation.

    ReplyDelete
  67. I think the Dabb & Loflin pair in the past have tried more with Sam than most of the other writers in the past few years, and definitely more than any currently on staff, with maybe the exception of Carver. The most recent Dabb episodes I thought have done a decent job with portraying Sam, and Dabb writes Sam as more active and smarter than many others, which is a plus. But Sam hasn't had a true centric episode in a long time - which wasn't Sam time equally split between at least three major stories - probably because he hasn't had a personal story arc with any apparent direction in a long time. I'm thinking maybe Repo Man was the last?

    ReplyDelete
  68. The big question here is "what does Sam want?" The anger over the lying and the angel possession doesn't need much explanation, unless the writers choose to tie it back to Sam's history, and apparently they're don't. But the part that is still muddy in my mind is how Sam sees everything. I was watching part of the episode again last night, and caught Sam focusing on the the monologue by the step-mom werewolf - about how her views were so different from her husband - and I thought that was an intended parallel to when Sam later told Dean that they don't see things the same. But what big question is, when Sam tells Dean they see things differently, how does Sam see things? IS his suicidal? Or is he just anti-resurrection and anti-possession? Does he want to hunt? If he doesn't, what DOES he want? Sam wanting to be normal was always a negative, and by that I mean it told us what he didn't want, but not really what he did want. It was always tied to him not wanting to hunt. What does normal even mean?


    I think the show made a mistake in not splitting their time apart into two episodes - one focusing on Dean and Cain, and the other on Sam on a hunt that paralleled Sam's state of mind and gave us more insight into what he's thinking. Making what was the one attempt at some Sam POV in the Cain episode focus on Kevin just muddied the picture, because while I believe there would be some guilt about Kevin, he would have rationally known that he didn't kill Kevin, and that's not the most important thought Sam is dealing with right now. The conversation they had this week seemed to have nothing to do with guilt over Kevin - at least on Sam's part.

    ReplyDelete
  69. I don't think Dean's happy right now.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Thanks! Glad you got something out of it. There are so many ways to watch these episodes, and we all bring our own interpretations to the table. I usually don't intentionally write a review with a very different angle than the other reviewers on this site, but that's often what happens anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  71. The writing was very muddy. The slapping of Garth didn't bother me. Sam seemed a little angry still, and I like it when he's not always written as a saint. The guy supposed to be half soulless Sam after all. Plus, slapping Garth was a better alternative to injecting him with adrenaline that might have killed him.

    ReplyDelete
  72. >But what big question is, when Sam tells Dean they see things
    differently, how does Sam see things? IS his suicidal? Or is he just
    anti-resurrection and anti-possession? Does he want to hunt? If he
    doesn't, what DOES he want?

    I had a little bit of an epiphany about Sam's issues and his seemingly always wanting to die and came to the conclusion that maybe it's less about him being suicidal and more about him wanting to assume some sort of control over his destiny. Since so much of his agency has been taken away from him in his life, it makes sense in that context. As far as him being currently suicidal is concerned, who the hell knows? He might be fine for the next six episodes and then all of a sudden he'll be back on his death wish kick. The writing for him is so inconsistent.

    I don't think he would have been out hunting on his own if he didn't want to hunt. As far as what he really wants in the long-term, again, we don't know because the writing for him is so inconsistent that it wouldn't surprise me if they had him running away to join the circus at the end of the season.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Yeah . . . . neither brother is happy, and I'm getting sick & tired of the brothers being placed in false, contrived conflicts. It's beyond annoying at this point!

    ReplyDelete
  74. I think that's basically what he was trying to say. He was saying, we'll work together, and the rest, he doesn't know. I think he was trying to be honest as best he could be.

    ReplyDelete
  75. That's a great point. Add to that Garth's asking Dean if he wanted a parner-hunter with werewolf 'mojo', which Dean declined.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Agree, I see visions of something with one episode, and then it's dropped with the next that is written by a different writer. I do see small gradual improvements in the larger story consistency, so fingers crossed Carver will get the message that Sam's writing has serious problems.

    I think your theory about this being about control over his destiny is a good one, and I would love to see it fleshed out so that it moves from theory to canon that is seen and understood by the majority of fans.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Back In Black Tricksteress 952 February 2014 at 04:00

    I agree with the dialogue bit. Things were cryptic but I think it could be the writers as well as just Sam. He is not really talk his own feelings out, he's more the introverted type. Sure there was a million things that was said at once but it shown that he does still want to have a relationship, its just unfortunate that it is a workplace kind and not the family business one.
    Dean gots the message loud and clear and he will try to do that, he obviously wants Sam stickin' around otherwise he'll push him away or let him die for that matter.
    So the bromance is abit off but as soon as this monster partnership slides by they will haveto talk things out eventually and healthily.
    Overall with this episode I thought it was sweet and Garth was good aswell.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Then poor Sam had to kill Madison because she was a feral newly turned
    Were-wolf but Garth was also newly -turned. How come he has such great
    control?


    I think 912 was going with Garth had/has Beth and her pack's full time support and they were already 'veggie lycanthropes' - the non-human heart eating kind- whom S&D had never encountered 'til Bitten. So they couldn't just suggest that Madison hunt cows or other wild or domestic animals in San Fran since they had never encountered werewolves they didn't chomp human hearts and secondly because in all prior seasons werewolf/hunter encounters were rare.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Dabb is one of my favorite current "Jared writers". I can't recall any Dabb (or Dabb/Loflin) episode since they started in S4 where "Jared" was sidelined or 'Sam' was obviously sent 'off' for Dean to 'bond' with guest or recurring guest characters.

    ReplyDelete
  80. I agree. The writers started something interesting and then let it drop. The concept was interesting to me, esp. when it wasn't clear if Lucifer was actually haunting Sam's dreams or if it was all in Sam's mind.

    ReplyDelete
  81. He did NOT say that. He just said, "If you want to hunt, we can hunt. If you want to be brothers . . . . . " What does that mean? He did not actually say what he meant so if Dean was confused and just continued to behave as he has been, I wouldn't blame him.

    My main complaint is Glass dropped the ball on that conversation, and it is likely b/c he has no idea what Sam wants or what Sam means.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Oh, yeah. That was a good scene. But nothing else happened w/him.

    I don't recall Sam talking about the bunker at all in DMC. I just remember Dean trying to make him feel better about the Apocalypse. And Sam didn't say anything to Tracy. She just yelled at him, accused him of killing her family, and made him feel bad.

    ReplyDelete
  83. They did the story b/c they made a huge deal about what dropping the wall would do to Sam. They couldn't very well, IMO, drop the wall and have Sam NOT be affected at all. And I didn't think the story made Sam a victim. How was he a victim? Something happened to him. That's all, and since the story as virtually dropped after HCW, it had no impact on Sam. Sam spent most of the season dealing w/his hallucinations remarkably well.


    And they didn't need MP to do the story. We're talking hallucinations here. That could have gone anywhere w/just a little imagination and creativity. But as I said, the story was dropped right after HCW, picked up literally 14 or 15 episodes later and wrapped up in one episode. It was a massive joke and a horrible way to tell what was an interesting story, IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  84. What rape references in season 7? All I remember was there was a lot of dick jokes, but no rape.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.