Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Community- Episodes 5.01/5.02 "Repilot/Introduction to teaching" Review- the show is back to its former glory!


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Community- Episodes 5.01/5.02 "Repilot/Introduction to teaching" Review- the show is back to its former glory!

4 Jan 2014

Share on Reddit

Community is back! That is something I’ve been dying to say. This is really a special show, mostly because it has the guts to do some risky storytelling and all kind of shifts along the narrative. After re-watching season 3 and 4 I can tell that the problem with last season is that it tuned down Community; seasons 2 and 3 were really intense and crazy, while season 4 seemed to return to the basic structure season 1 had. As such, the show felt like it was reverting to its old self instead of evolving and that was not ok; there were good episodes last season, but it lacked the spark that makes the show great.

We are only 2 episodes into the season and I can already tell that the direction is way different and that the writers (plus Dan Harmon pulling the strings) are doing the best for the show to move forward and not backwards like last season and I feel like the spark is back, or at least it's starting to light. “Repilot” is an episode that is fairly enjoyable, but nothing to be crazy about; it’s mostly busy work to piece the show and its characters back together again, while “Introduction to Teaching” feels more like a classic Community episode. I liked both episodes and I was glad to see that it didn’t take too long for Community to find its footing.

Starting with “Repilot” we pick up sometime after Jeff graduated; he is trying to make it as a lawyer and he is failing miserably. And complete failure is the perfect time for evil ex-coworker Alan Connor to show up and alert Jeff about a potential lawsuit against Greendale. Jeff is doing so bad that once his drink is taken away from him he decides he has no choice but to do so.

Seeing Jeff return to Greendale has a strange feel of rebirth; as he walks down the corridors of his old community college and stares at the trophy he and Annie won as debate champions there is this feeling that the whole show is returning to what it once was. In fact “Repilot” is all about restarts; Jeff goes to get the records of a student named Humphries, who after graduating from Greendale has been building collapsing bridges (and we get to see his great thesis, a lego bridge that also collapses), so he can make the case for suing Greendale. The dean finds out that Jeff is looking for the records, but he assumes Jeff is there to help him save Greendale to which Jeff lies and says yes.

It turns out the old study room is now a records room and while Jeff is searching for Humphries records, Abed pops out (“I see your value now. It’s a reference from when we first met in season one”) and tells Jeff that he is part of the “Save Greendale” committee and he has invited the whole gang there. As everyone (minus Pierce who won ‘t be returning) gathers around their old table I couldn’t help but smile; nothing really memorable has happened yet, but there is a change in the air that makes you feel that the show has restored its sense of self. One of the main troubles of season 4 (aside from the one already mentioned above) it was that the show seemed to be struggling to find itself, as if it was lost and it didn’t know what to aim for. Seeing the study group reunited and hear them how their lives haven’t got any better since they left Greendale brings back to Community its feel of identity (or should I say “I-dean-tity”?); this was a show about broken people coming together in order to make something better, last season only some episodes felt that way, but now that feeling has surged to the surface once again and it seems the whole season will continue to carry on that.

As Jeff discovers Humphries records were shredded, he decides to create 5 new cases against Greendale, convincing his friends that it was this community college the one that dragged them down; Britta is bartender, Annie administer drugs to hospitals instead of working in hospital administration, Troy is waiting for Abed to complete a new social media app and then sue him, and Abed himself has done only one commercial for which he hasn’t been paid (Jeff assures him he is going to write him a check, but we know he won’t).}

Of the whole group Shirley is the one who has it the worst; her business failed, her husband left her and took her DVR (which had Bones in it) and now she is just waiting for him to call her. Jeff sees he is about convince his friends to turn against his school, he gets cocky and meets briefly with Alan to show him who is boss and we have a very funny scene in which he forces Alan to take his tie off and he hits him with it. As he goes back to the study room he finds out his friends have decided to enroll once again in Greendale, but soon they find out that Chang has been sleeping on some records boxes and that he is a math teacher now (also he dropped his Changnesia act, thank god!); this drives the gang insane and as they are about to turn against Greendale, Alan comes up and tells the group that Jeff intended to turn them against Greendale.

In a classic Community turns of events, the group decides to let Jeff decide if he is taking the case or not; and as the group is pretty sure Jeff is going to take the case, Abed decides to burn the table because no one else deserves it and everyone agrees. Jeff is about to leave, but then he sees a Pierce hologram warning him not to do it. It was a nice touch, and even better when he said he was never allowed to return (which is an obvious reference to Chevy Chase’s troubles with the cast and crew of the show). It took me by surprise and I like it, it followed up one of the few things I really liked of season 4, which was the fact that Pierce redeemed himself and showed that he could be also some kind of likeable character.

So Jeff confronts the dean about how crappy Greendale is and tells him that he should work to make the school a place where people shouldn’t be crazy in order to care about it; the dean offers Jeff a teaching job so he can help him improve Greendale. Jeff reluctantly agrees (and off camera too) and then goes to the entrance of the school where the group is about to burn the table to the ground. Jeff stops them as he says that he is not going to sure the school, and everyone makes a resolution to enroll once again in Greendale to do something different, to keep improving (except for Britta, who is insistent in being a psychologist). Then they burn the law suit Jeff was preparing and as he drops the paper on fire to the ground the table gets caught up in the fire. It doesn’t matter much though, the group makes another table for the study room and all is back to what it once was, but Jeff is teacher now.

“Repilot” is not the funniest Community episode, but it is certainly an enjoyable one; it offers the so much needed feel of identity the show seemed to lose last season and some very funny gags in the middle along with some references. It makes you feel like the show is back on track.

Grade: B+

Now as I said before “Introduction to teaching” feels more like a classic Community episode; with Repilot putting Community’s pieces back together, the show now is able to do its classic risky storytelling with twists and turns.

It starts with Jeff completely clueless of how to run his class; he has been a Greendale student for so long that he is not really comfortable with changing his status to teacher. No matter how much a teacher or a student tries to have symmetric relationships there is an obvious difference in the dynamic of it all; being a teacher means you get treated differently than if you are a student. In Greendale in particular, Jeff soon learns from Annie’s Criminology professor Buzz Hickey (who he shares office with) that teachers can skip launch lines and that they can do pretty much whatever they want in the classroom.

Annie finds out about this pretty quickly and she enrolls in Jeff’s class in order to make sure he does a proper job as a teacher; it doesn’t work that much at first, but once Jeff wins an argument against her and she leaves the classroom, Jeff’s students are impressed and asks him how he did it and as he explains how Jeff discovers how he can teach these students the little he knows about law and he also find out that he actually likes teaching.

Jeff is so excited about it that he goes to Annie to tell her that he might enjoy teaching, but Annie is crying because Hickey gave her an “A-” (spoiler alert, this is the grade of the episode); that drives Annie crazy and she decides to drop Jeff’s class, so he goes to confront Hickey about it; turns out that “-” in the grades are just a convention used by professors to deal with unpleasant students.

Soon Jeff meets Annie again and tells her that she actually got an “A” and that minus are just the way teachers deal with troublesome students. As expected Annie gets mad and it just take one shout from her (“Minuses are a lie!”) to start a riot. One thing I missed so much about the show is how crazy it can get; from one second to another Greendale can implode and it’s so funny to watch how the students are destroying campus so they can get slightly better grades.

Finally, the dean convinces him to form an actual “Save Greendale Committee” in order to forge a student-teacher alliance so that the riots can be reduced to 40% with Jeff on charge. Hickey pops up to apologize to Jeff as he admits that teachers might be working for the students and not for themselves. One of the things I really liked about this episode was how Jeff realized how satisfying teaching is and how important is to take the students in consideration; it has always been known how important teachers are, but not many tv shows tackle this, and Community has done it right, it’s funny and it’s also kind of sweet.

Now, on the B plot (and the funniest of it all); Shirley, Britta, Troy and Abed take a class on Nicolas Cage with professor Sean Garrity (performed by a great actor, Kevin Corrigan, seen in season 2), which asks the question “is he a good or bad actor?”. Abed already deduced the answer of another class named “Who is the boss?” and he is ready to take on the challenge, but professor Garrity warns him to be careful.

Abed being Abed obsessed trying to find a logical answer; every actor is something, some are good, some are bad, others are the good kind of bad or the bad kind of good, but he doesn’t seem able to find an answer to what Nicolas Cage is. And soon we get to see Abed like never before; for the first time in his life there is something that doesn’t make any sense at all no matter how much he tries to find the answer; he works and works, he watches as many movies as possible trying to come up with something, but he gets nothing. Finally, in class, he arrives completely scruffy, sleepless and maybe with some borderline dementia as he impersonates some of Nicolas Cage’s acting and goes completely mad around the classroom to the point he climbs up the professor’s table and claims “I’m a cat. I’m a sexy cat”. Danny Pudi’s acting skills make this scene go from just funny to hilarious; Abed has never been so disturbed about something illogical and seeing him meltdown completely is great, and Garrity’s reaction (“that was brilliant”) was just golden, a magnificent way to end a great scene.

The follow up with Shirley going to Abed’s apartment in order to cheer him up is also nice. After a failed attempt to turn him a Christian, Shirley explains him that he can’t understand every single thing and convinces Abed that, in the end, Cage can be seen as both good and bad, “an angel to some and a demon to others”. What I like about it is not really the resolution of it all, but mostly seeing Shirley and Abed get the chance to interact one on one, which is very rare in this show. I like their on screen chemistry and how Shirley helped calm Abed down.

“Introduction to teaching” takes Community back to its crazy self, showing us that the show still has the guts to burn Greendale down to the grounds if it has to, and for me that’s the best Community, the one that is fearless and can take any single direction. What else can I ask for this show? Nothing; its characters are already great so with the proper risky and crazy storytelling, I’m good to go.

Grade: A-

Stray Observations:

-Troy: "Doesn't it feel weird that we are doing this..." *stares at Pierce's seat "... without Magnitude?"

-I was shocked that after Abed mentioned how one of the Scrubs cast members left after six episodes Troy got the line when he says “That son of a bitch! After everything Scrubs did for him!” Obviously making a reference to Donald Glover's departure; it’ll be a sad day when he leaves.

-Can I say once again how much I loved the “It’s my I-dean-tity!” line? No? Ok.

-Community didn’t do great on the ratings, but it can still live on considering the poor state of NBC's comedies. The show can’t end until every single cast member has said “Shut up Leonard!”; so far, Jeff, Shirley, Britta and the dean have done it.

-I love how the dean comes to the study room with an apple, a graduate cap, glasses and a pipe to dress Jeff as a teacher. Both Joel McHale and Jim Rash’s faces were priceless.

-I'm really excited that Chang will be a teacher again; I loved him as spanish teacher in season 1; from season 3 and onwards I haven't been really crazy about his character, but that might Chang-e now.

-Hickey (who I assume will become a new cast member) likes to draw comics of ducks; I can see a storyline being made out of that.

-The end of “Introduction to teaching” with Dean thinking in French about how much he wanted to teach Jeff excel was gold.

About the Author - Pablo
I'm currently studying Psychology while also writing fantasy books (one already published in my home country, Chile, you can check it out on the facebook icon). I watch many different types of shows, including my favorites Revenge, Game of Thrones, Once Upon a Time and about 23 more. Currently writing reviews for Once Upon a Time, How I Met Your Mother and Community

23 comments:

  1. Great review! I loved both episodes of the premiere, even though they were not the best episodes ever, simply having quality writing and Dan Harmon back made it great to me. Even in the resetting of the world and the characters, the first episode had some great one-liners and Pierce's cameo was great, so glad they kept that underwrap.


    Can't wait for the rest of the season! Thank goodness that the best comedy on TV is truly back now. Six seasons and a movie!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great job! I had some similar sentiments about both episodes as well. Well, worth the wait for the show's return.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Indeed, the quality is back! :D
    Now, we just have to wait for that sixth season that is coming! (and then the movie)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Then after that, the next milestone, twelve seasons and a theme park!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I disagree that the show reverting to its old self is a bad thing. The characters are just as important a part of the show as the craziness (more important, IMO), and Season 3 was letting the craziness start to ruin the characters. Season 4 started to bring the characters back to where they were supposed to be at the sacrifice of craziness. Like Jeff said in the Season 5 premiere, they were turning into cartoon characters at one point, but Season 4 brought them back from that. And I'm happy to see that Season 5 is apparently sticking with the idea of getting the characters back on track before jumping into all of the craziness.


    I also didn't feel like Season 4 had lost the show's identity. After all, we got more Greendale in Season 4 than we did in Season 3, proportionally speaking. But I do understand thinking that Season 4 strayed from the show's identity if you believe that the show's craziness is its identity; to me the show's craziness has only ever been a part of the show's identity, especially when every single season has had plenty of non-crazy episodes distributed throughout them.


    I liked the first two episodes overall (or rather, I would have liked the first episode a lot more if all of the funny parts hadn't been spoiled by the trailers, but I was still impressed by the Pierce and Zach Braff cameos), and I found the second episode to be very funny, but I was also kind of put off by some of the things that seemed to be thrown into the episodes just for weirdness's sake. For example, the Dean dressing Jeff like a graduate while singing the graduation song... Jeff has already graduated, so it's inappropriate; there's no truth in the joke, so it's not funny... Jeff's face/reaction was humorous, but as a whole the scene was just weird rather than funny. Same with Dean's thoughts being in French and the end tag of the second episode. I didn't dislike any of these things, but they seemed extremely odd and pointless, which gives the season a really weird feeling unlike any I've felt in the prior four seasons.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great review, Pablo.

    As for Jim The Duck... https://twitter.com/Jim_TheDuck

    ReplyDelete
  7. Fair point you brought up, but I disagree to some extent. On the one hand, yes they toned down some of the craziness last season but it felt hollow because it didn't have the spark that Dan Harmon brought to the series. So while the characters were a little less crazy, I don't think they really brought the characters back to who they were, they just became carbon copies of what they thought they were. They became fairly one dimensional, aside from Jeff, in Season 4.



    I think that people don't associate Season 4 "losing the show's identity" to it not being as crazy as it used to be. Like I said, the characters felt hollow without Dan there. The new showrunners and writers did their best, and I commend them for trying to remain in the same vain as Seasons 1-3, but the characters and the show itself just felt like it was trying too hard to pander to the fans. Instead of making these characters these people that you can relate to, they were turned into one-note people: Abed - movie references only, Dean - dressing up for the sake of dressing up, etc. It's not that it wasn't crazy anymore, it's that the show just wasn't itself anymore.


    Now with Dan back, and having the year off, he got to reground the characters. I do think the bit about how they went in as human beings and came as cartoons was talking about Community during his era and without him there. Jeff said it was a 4 year trek to becoming these cartoon characters. So I think Dan's year off gave him some perspective and allowed him to just make these characters people again.


    Also, the Zach Braff thing was taken from a Scrubs Season 9 episode, the one Abed showed at the end of the episode. Zach didn't actually record anything for Community.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Can you define the spark that Dan brought to the series?


    And can you elaborate more on what you mean about the characters becoming one dimensional? Troy remained exactly the same. Kind of stupid, kind of naive, kind of innocent. Abed returned to his Seasons 1 and 2 self. Shirley returned to her old self and was even made smarter than before. Chang developing the amnesia bit is by definition at least two-dimensional. Pierce became likable and almost fatherly, which offered him much more than just one-dimensional depth. Jeff was pretty much the exact same guy as before except a little nicer and a little afraid of graduating. Britta was pretty much the same person as from Season 3, except she got some of her activist interests back. The only character I can really see the one-dimensional argument working for is Annie.


    Normally I would agree with you about people not thinking Season 4 lost the show's identity due to a lack of craziness, but that seems to be the idea that this article has. (It's certainly a unique idea, but I was specifically responding to Pablo's idea that the craziness was the show's identity rather than some widely held belief that the craziness is the show's identity.)


    Abed wasn't just doing movie references in Season 4. He was also doing TV references, comic references, meta references, cartoon references... And the Dean dressing up just for the sake of dressing up started in Season 2. I felt Season 3 was a worse offender in this department than Season 4 was.


    True about the four year trek thing, but how much weight can we really give that since we know Harmon hates Season 4 and refuses to acknowledge any of the good that Season 4 did? If Season 4 had been better than Seasons 1-3 combined, he'd still say it was a gas leak year where the characters acted like cartoons because since the show did the plot lines he wanted to do, he views the season as having "raped [his] family right in front of [him]".


    The only old characters who have received any depth in Season 5 so far are Annie and Shirley (bonding with Abed over Hellraiser), and arguably the Dean if we count him changing from loving Greendale to only using it for a paycheck as depth. Everyone else is pretty much the same as their Season 1, 3, or 4 selves.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I understand your point, but I don't agree with you; it's not that the craziness is the show's identity, it's the crazy people in it. They are all so broken and by coming together they create something better, a family. Season 4 was in a way too normal for these crazy guys, it seemed as if they were just normal people involved in crazy circunstances instead of the crazy bunch of guys making ordinary situations crazy. Most of the characters felt really off, there was something different about them. It's not that they are not allowed to grow into more stable versions of themselves, it's just that season 4 made them way too normal too fast and it seemed like the show no longer recognized who these guys were in the first place; there were some moments in which you recognized them, like in the Thanksgiving episode, the dance episode and the Freaky Friday episode, but aside from that they acted in a manner that was really off most of the time (The Inspector Time episode took Annie, Abed and Troy to places were I thought "these are not the characters I know and love")..
    The characters on a TV show need to evolve, but I think season 4 made them too soft and bland for what they once were. There was some good in that, like making a more likeable Pierce or a more understending and empathic Abed, but aside from that there was something lost in Annie, Troy, Shirley, Britta and even Jeff.
    Season 4 wasn't awful, it just lost the spark that made the show great, and that spark is not the craziness itself, but the crazy part that every character had on them

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think most of the characters were pretty near one-dimensional in season 4. Season 3 dared to bring up some conflict between Troy and Abed, and forced both Troy to start acting like an adult while forcing Abed to take other people's feeling in consideration. In season 4, there wasn't much conflict aside from the moment were Troy knew he wanted to end things up with Britta. There was some lack of development on the conflict that made the whole thing bland.
    Annie mostly just tried to play house with Jeff, Shirley didn't get to do much either. Pierce did redeem himself and I liked it, it was one of the characters that got the best treatment and I glad it was him, because it was badly needed.
    As for the spark thing, I already replied above, but it's not the craziness itself but the crazy sides of the characters that was tuned down in season 4 and made me feel like I was watching carbon copies of the same characters. Only 2 episodes really bored me, but while I somewhat enjoyed the rest it never lived up to what the show was before; Greendale felt like a more quiet place, the characters seemed to be quiet too. It was way too quiet, to the point sometimes the episode ended and I was like "is that all?". It's the quirks and the crazy in all of these characters that brought them together and what keeps them together; they are all friends with each other because all of them are equally crazy, and by coming together they forge unity, a "community" if you may, and by taking that way from the show, it doesn't feel like itself; season 4 was like watching a Community spin off with copies of the same characters. It was ok, not bad, not great, just ok.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks JL! And thanks for the twitter account! I'm glad NBC and Community do gigs like this, pretty much like HIMYM do! It's pretty awesome!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thanks Lilith! Glad you liked it!
    I'm sad that it's only 13 episodes, it feels like this season deserves at least 16 (for one, to get to 100 episodes, and 2, in order to exploit this new energy to its fullest!)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Michael Di Biasi5 January 2014 at 02:57

    Great review! I only disagree with one thing; the notion that season 4 tuned down Community. I believe that season 4 suffered from poor direction from writers that didn't understand the show at all. Which is evidenced by Annie becoming an Aww machine, Troy's only stories involved Abed (Britta relationship didn't count as it was clearly dealt with poorly) and Britta's only characteristic becoming "bad therapist". Season 4 didn't tone down Community, it was simply a poor replication (Don't take a job if you don't know how to do it ex-showrunners!)


    About these episodes: Repilot was obviously damage control, which did not make it unenjoyable (I should know rewatched it 3 times). While it does suck seeing my little blueberries (:P) in such bad places (heart goes out to Shirley) they're back together again... mostly. I give it a solid B. Not amazing, not horrible, simply average, and after the season we have had I love average. Average community is brilliant! Like tasting your mothers cooking after you have been away for a year. It feels like home.


    Introduction to teaching was a fun episode, it sets up a new kind of format for the show (split between the teacher/student world) and dynamic (Mr. Winger) with all the characters which was the smart way to go, as much as I want it to go back to normal (thanks to the gas leak year that went out the fucking window). What I am most happy about (wasn't crazy about the Nicholas Cage b-story but its something Dan Harmon wanted to do so I think that was mostly for him than for us, not complaining. I did chuckle) is that the show is clearly back with Dan's voice which is the most welcome thing of all. Six seasons and a Movie! again I give this a B (I know its tempting to give it an A- but we all know when community is an A: Chicken Fingers, Space bus, Modern Warfare, Abed's Uncontrollable Christmas, Zombie episode, Bottle Episode, Clip show and Anthropology 101 are all examples of A's) I have no doubt that we will get back to A's this season. Welcome back Mr Harmon, we've all missed you!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Well with Dan, the writing is definitely better. The stories are more solid (with some stinkers, but who is perfect), the characters are portrayed better, the jokes are great, and everything just clicks. Season 4 lacked that where very little clicked.

    I disagree with how the characters were in Season 4. I thought the writers only really gave them one trait: Troy - dumb, Abed - references, Shirley - religion, Britta - quirky/dumb, Annie - likes Jeff, the Dean - dresses up. Where as in Seasons 1-3, they were more rounded as characters. Sure they were all of those things, but they were also so much more. They weren't defined solely based on those attributes. But in Season 4, that's pretty much all there was. There wasn't any substance, all they were was just what was on the surface. I will give you Pierce though, if Season 4 did anything right, it's making Pierce fatherly again (which he had glimpses of in Season 1 particularly).

    Yes, but Abed is a complex character. He doesn't do any sort of reference for the sake of doing a reference, like Season 4. Dan knows Abed, because essentially, Abed is a representation of Dan. And only Dan really knows his mind. Like I said before, on the surface he does that, but there's so much more substance there. And I disagree about the Dean dressing up too much starting in Season 2. Season 3 maybe was starting to push it, but it just went way too far in Season 4 that it just wasn't funny anymore.

    Did you see anything about Dan's reaction past that first initial reaction? Yes, he did say some pretty bad stuff, and not note any of the positive things from Season 4. But he did come back and apologize for it, explaining where his head was at and why he has trouble with turning that off. You can't just look at that one instance of him being bad. Sure he could've handled it better, but he's handled it better since.


    Even in such a short outing so far (the first 2 episodes), I can already see the more rounded, rich characters that were present in Seasons 1-3, that weren't there in Season 4. Sure we haven't had a lot of depth, but just watching any Season 4 episode up against these 2, I can easily tell a difference.


    But all of this is just my opinion, and my view of the characters and the show. Maybe to you, you don't see these differences that I (and a lot of other fans) see. And that's perfectly fine. To each their own.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Well I would argue that normal people in crazy circumstances is exactly who these guys were in the first place. Just rewatch the first few episodes of Season 1 for proof of that (or really nearly any episode of Season 1 before the paintball episode).


    I understand not liking that interpretation of the characters, but you can't say it wasn't true to who they once were, for the most part.

    ReplyDelete
  16. When did you last see Seasons 3 and 4? Maybe the reason we're on such different pages with those two seasons is because you're relying solely on your 1-2 year old memory of the seasons while I just finished rewatching them both back to back, if you haven't rewatched them recently. Because I understand where you're coming from in your argument if you're relying on your memory of the seasons.


    I remembered Season 3 being much better and Season 4 being much worse until I just rewatched them. But it's amazing how poorly the characters were written in Season 3 after going back to it. All of those one-dimensional attributes you just mentioned are even more obvious in Season 3 than in Season 4. In fact, Season 4 has quite a bit more depth than what you described, but if you had been describing Season 3's representation of the characters, you would have been dead on.


    Yes, I saw that Dan apologized for his reaction to Season 4, but then I also saw him badmouth the writers again later on, and then apologize again, and never actually say a positive word about the season (just apologize about the negative words he said).

    ReplyDelete
  17. I remember Season 4 bringing up conflict between Troy and Abed (4x03), forcing Troy to act like an adult (4x11), and forcing Abed to take others' feelings into consideration (4x02, 4x03, 4x04, 4x08, and 4x12).


    Season 4 had more conflict than Season 1 had. Is Season 1 a subpar season because of that?


    I do agree that the Troy/Britta thing lacked the needed development though.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I watched Seasons 1-4 in the week before the Season 5 premiere, so I have it all fresh in my mind. I was a pretty good defender of Season 4 for a long time, aware that it was different but just being optimistic about it. But since it had ended, I hadn't watched it all together again, and seeing it all back to back just made all of Season 4's flaws glaringly obvious.

    I have noticed a lot of people think Season 4 isn't as bad on a rewatch, yet for some reason for me, it was an opposite reaction. While I agree that Season 3 wasn't as good on a rewatch as I recall (although it does have some of my favorite episodes), personally I still feel the characters were still three-dimensional. I will say they were heading towards being not-so and a bit more gimmicky than they were previously had been, but they were still more well-rounded than Season 4.

    Still, in my perspective, Season 4 just amplified that and just made them all one-dimensional. There were a couple episodes that they did have some depth, such as Jeff confronting his father (one of the best parts of the season), Pierce helping Jeff and Britta, and the episode Jim Rash wrote (which I think was the one that resembled Seasons 1-3 the most, yet still a bit lower).



    I don't know where the discrepancy is between us, but I will thank you for discussing with it reasonably and in detail, as opposed to those people who just say "this sucked, you're wrong, the end." At any rate, I'm glad that you got more value out of Season 4 than I do now.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Michael Di Biasi5 January 2014 at 10:31

    Great review! I only disagree with one thing; the notion that season 4 tuned down Community. I believe that season 4 suffered from poor direction from writers that didn't understand the show at all. Which is evidenced by Annie becoming an Aww machine, Troy's only stories involved Abed (Britta relationship didn't count as it was clearly dealt with poorly) and Britta's only characteristic becoming "bad therapist". Season 4 didn't tone down Community, it was simply a poor replication (Don't take a job if you don't know how to do it ex-showrunners!)


    About these episodes: Repilot was obviously damage control, which did not make it unenjoyable (I should know rewatched it 3 times). While it does suck seeing my little blueberries (:P) in such bad places (heart goes out to Shirley) they're back together again... mostly. I give it a solid B. Not amazing, not horrible, simply average, and after the season we have had I love average. Average community is brilliant! Like tasting your mothers cooking after you have been away for a year. It feels like home.


    Introduction to teaching was a fun episode, it sets up a new kind of format for the show (split between the teacher/student world) and dynamic (Mr. Winger) with all the characters which was the smart way to go, as much as I want it to go back to normal (thanks to the gas leak year that went out the window). What I am most happy about (wasn't crazy about the Nicholas Cage b-story but its something Dan Harmon wanted to do so I think that was mostly for him than for us, not complaining. I did chuckle) is that the show is clearly back with Dan's voice which is the most welcome thing of all. Six seasons and a Movie! again I give this a B (I know its tempting to give it an A- but we all know when community is an A: Chicken Fingers, Space bus, Modern Warfare, Abed's Uncontrollable Christmas, Zombie episode, Bottle Episode, Clip show and Anthropology 101 are all examples of A's) I have no doubt that we will get back to A's this season. Welcome back Mr Harmon, we've all missed you!

    ReplyDelete
  20. But they became crazy pretty soon, from the Christmas episode onwards when they got into a fight it's obvious that these guys are not regular people; many episodes from there onwards on season 1 portrays them as pretty crazy people making normal circunstances crazy. That also counts for episode 2 with Jeff and Pierce's presentation in Chang's class: the thing was suppossed to be a simple conversation, 2 minutes long and they made a whole hour of so of craziness (and got an F- in the process). I think in season 1 they looked kind of normal but the crazy was slowly coming out as they became comfortable with each other, which happens in real life too. In season 4, it was like they suddenly shut down the crazy and started the whole process of showing the crazy as they get comfortable with each other all over again; that's why I say season 4 essentially reverted the characters to their season 1 selves instead of moving forward like they were suppossed to. It felt like the show just stopped the route it was following and took a completely different one; that's what I really don't like about season 4, and that's why I think it lost some of its identety: the show had been forging an identity since season 1, it's not like it was carved on stone since the pilot, it has been a continium which followed these people who, as they get to love each other they also showed who they really were, crazy as they might be. The season 4 episode that achieved this was the Thanksgiving one when Jeff admitted to his father who he really was, but aside from that there was an evident lack of development on that department, as if the show was aiming for something different while not knowing exactly what it was aiming.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thanks for your comment! That's a good way to look at it, especially the whole tasting your mother's cooking after years, that is definitely how I felt while watching "Repilot".

    I commented that there were 2 or 3 episodes last season that really bored me, and those are the only ones where I felt there was poor direction from the writers (The Inspector Space Time episode, the German episode and to some extent the season finale), but aside from that I think they weren't that bad; not good either, it was pretty bland, but not awful. At times they found how to treat Jeff, Pierce and especially the dean well and episodes focused on them were usually the stronger ones, but even those were kind of tuned down; Community was pretty quiet last season, the only two storylines it had with Changnesia and the darkest timeline never lived up to their fullest because they felt really self contained; the darkest timeline ended up in the always awry teorritory of "it was all a dream" while Chagnesia ended before being anything at all (and the whole thing with the other college's dean preparing a strike against Greendale was also left on the air). They made these particular storylines really quiet, and everything that happened to the characters was quiet as well, with some few exceptions.

    There was poor direction at times, but I didn't feel it was all the time, while I think the show was too quiet the whole season, as if its voice was taken away from it, something that Repilot gives back to it.

    I do think we'll see an A episode this season, and its name is "Cooperative Polygraphy", which is the 4th this season; I've been hearing its pretty awesome classic Community.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I don't know... The fight didn't seem crazy to me. Not in the "crazy Community" type of crazy anyway.


    But if something like that counts as crazy, why does't the things that Season 4 did count as crazy? Is Abed imagining his life as a sitcom not crazy? Or as a Muppet Babies ripoff? Is Troy and Britta making crazy wishes in a wishing fountain and then rolling around in it not crazy? Is the whole Hunger Deans plot not crazy? And that's just the premiere episode. If you need more examples, there are plenty in nearly every episode of Season 4.


    I can understand the argument that the fight was crazy or that the fight wasn't crazy. But I don't understand the argument that the fight was crazy but these things I just mentioned from Season 4 weren't crazy.


    I do agree that Season 4 borrowed a lot from the characters' Season 1 characteristics, but it actually pulled from both Seasons 1 and 3 in its characterizations. Shirley working on her sandwich business in Season 4? That came from Season 3. Britta as psychologist in Season 4? That came from Season 3. Jeff being really into finding his dad in Season 4? That came from Season 3. The show progressed the characters from their Season 3 selves while also reincorporating the people that they originally were in Seasons 1 and 2 before Season 3 turned them into cartoon characters.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Michael Di Biasi6 January 2014 at 00:41

    Yeah I have been hearing the same thing. Im looking forward to the "Floor is lava" episode as well.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.