Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon POLL : What did you think of Atlantis - Hunger Pangs?
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

POLL : What did you think of Atlantis - Hunger Pangs?

14 Dec 2013

Share on Reddit

-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

7 comments:

  1. Sandi15 December 2013 at 13:33

    If you read my preview of this episode then you'll know that I wasn't very keen on this episode. I found the acting pretty wooden, and the script had problems...one of the biggest for me being the killing of a man who was doing nothing but protecting the temple of his Goddess against attackers and looters, hardly made our heroes 'hero like' :/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nimueh12315 December 2013 at 19:59

    I have to agree with you. I was actually pretty shocked how poor the script was. The whole story somehow seemed --- wrong. Jason eating all the meat although he knew his friends were hungry, the point you mentioned about killing the man who protected his temple, Jason running away from ONE single guy despite his 'super' powers, Pythagoras having some 'clever' ideas out of nowhere, Jason turning into a werewolf????? Really??? Are we going to have vampires next???
    And then Ariadne and the castle crew turned up out of the blue. I has forgotten they existed!
    It seems they were hoping we would be too blinded by Jason's frequently naked body.....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sandi15 December 2013 at 20:29

    Yep, the whole episode seems to be a success due to the amount of nakedness if the shows twitter account is anything to go by...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Feekk19 December 2013 at 00:04

    I just watched the episode. I think this is intended to be a filler episode, a light and funny one. I laughed throughout the episode. And this is just my opinion that I think you guys are being too critical of it. After episodes of heavy storylines, this episode tried to go slow and just tell us something different than the usual format. I'm sure the next episode they will get us back on track.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sandi19 December 2013 at 15:15

    I, too, laughed at various points in the episode and I agree that a light hearted episode is needed between the heavier storylines that precede and follow it, but I don't feel that this one was fully thought through.


    My issues had nothing to do with it being a filler episode but rather that the script was weak in places and the acting a bit under par. The very fact that the gang act like villains by stealing from a shrine and then murdering someone who is trying to protect that shrine is something I can not understand, or endorse as heroic or just.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Feekk19 December 2013 at 15:41

    That killing part was understandably questionable. However, the way I justify it is that, Pythagoras said that the rabid dog creatures were cursed to be monsters, so maybe the monster was actually the rabid dog, so technically they didn't kill any human being? Or do you have a problem with it killing, regardless whom being killed?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sandi19 December 2013 at 15:54

    The problem I have is that they put the whole series of events in place by stealing in the first place. Not only from the alter, but also from the guy who hired them to kill the rats when Pythagoras and Hercules eat his food. It's not how the hero is suppose to act, therefore I find it hard to have much sympathy for them when it all goes tits up.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.