Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon POLL : What did you think of Bones - The Nazi on the Honeymoon?


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

POLL : What did you think of Bones - The Nazi on the Honeymoon?

Nov 5, 2013

Share on Reddit

12 comments:

  1. l loved it! Cam, Hodgins, and Angela chasing after the babies was hilarious. And they were cute at the end. Aww at Hodgins and Angela deciding they want another one.


    And Booth and Brennan were also cute.

    ReplyDelete
  2. aw,what a good ep.With everyone keeping their eyes on the kids so B & B could have a good time on their honeymoon.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really liked the episode but did anyone else think that Christine looked older than Michael?

    ReplyDelete
  4. 1 - Really? Venezuelan Music in Buenos Aires? A 5 * Hotel in Buenos Aires? is that Mr. HH was ever in Argentina? I do not think so.

    2 - exchanged Christine? That girl will NOT the same Christine. Moreover, how can it be much larger than the Michael?

    3 - The nazi lived in a Mexican house in Buenos Aires? Seriously?

    4 - Where's the romance in the honeymoon, honey? That was the honeymoon episode?

    That was the worst episode of Bones since 1x1. With epi. like this , I believe that this is indeed the last season of Bones. And if the tip of Brennan is true, then, in the end o season 9, she will be a widow.

    ReplyDelete
  5. go away troll

    ReplyDelete
  6. It was OK. Didn't hate it like other people n tumblr but that episode definitely wasn't Bones' best..

    ReplyDelete
  7. go away troll

    ReplyDelete
  8. I had a problem with that too in the beginning, cause she's supposed to be about 8 months younger than him and that shows a lot in toddlers. Bu if you think about it, B&B are a lot taller then Hodgins and Angela, so it would make sense for her to grow faster

    ReplyDelete
  9. It was ok. There were some cute moments - but most of the cute B/B scenes had already been in the promo. I expected a lot more romance considering it was the honeymoon episode. But the case was interesting. And I loved Angela & Hodgins looking after the kids. Can't work out why Michael Vincent looks younger than Christine though, but never mind, I'll give them a pass on that one since we did get to see them both. It's been too long, especially for Michael!


    I do love hearing Brennan refer to Booth as "my husband, Seeley Booth" though!

    ReplyDelete
  10. -BB do not seem like big resort style people to me.


    -And your right- go back to the picture of the Christine "twin" from the wedding episode and they are not the same kid- this Christine is about a head taller and looks a year, if not more older than Michael- when he's suppose to be 8 months older. Perhaps they had more problems with the twins that play her again?


    -I wouldn't say that this was the worst episode since the pilot, but it was pretty bad- tacky and brennan was just annoying- and that's a pretty loyal fan talking.


    -I do find the nazi in Argentina credible- nazi war criminals hid themselves all over the world and started new lives- they've been found living through out the world and extradited to the Hague to face trial.


    -With the AMERICAN ratings are going, they are going to have to write better stuff than that episode to keep going for another season. (the illegal downloads have been some of the highest and Bones in Australia, now that it has caught up, has been in the top 10 each week)

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don't think it was the same actress/set of twins that usually play her. They couldn't get the twins to co-operate in the wedding episode, so perhaps they wouldn't work this episode- but still you think they could have picked someone smaller- or someone bigger for Michael- we haven't seen Michael for about a year so that wouldn't be too hard.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.