Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Revolution 2.04 "Patriot Games" Review: Levelling the Playing Field


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Revolution 2.04 "Patriot Games" Review: Levelling the Playing Field

Oct 20, 2013

Share on Reddit
   
     This week’s episode of Revolution, “Patriot Games,” was written by Anne Cofell Saunders and Paul Grellong and directed by Charles Beeson. The various plots are starting to come together, and I don’t think it will be long before all of the main characters are back together.

    The episode begins with a great fight scene. It’s really nice to see them letting Charlie (Tracy Spiridakos) hold her own – until the roofie takes affect anyway. There’s a great fade out from her eyes to Rachel’s (Elizabeth Mitchell). At first it feels like Rachel may be dreaming, until she runs into Miles (Billy Burke), who tells her she was out for three days and introduces her to Ed Truman (Steven Culp) – one of the Patriots with the US government. Miles is still using his alias and Truman calls him Stu, but he calls Rachel, Rachel, and we already know that there is a bounty on her head. It was pretty shocking to find out that Ken (Richard T Jones) was a sleeper for the Patriots. I wonder if Gene (Stephen Collins) is as well, and that is what or who that is protecting Rachel.

    Once again Stephen Collins delivers another amazing performance as he tries to discourage Rachel from getting involved. We learn that Rachel had tried to kill herself after coming back to Willoughby. It’s possible the Patriots were targeting Willoughby with Titus (Matt Ross) to begin with in an attempt to prove they are the good guys and to keep Rachel in line.

    The fact that they are calling themselves Patriots, clearly links them to Randall and the bombs, as does the fact that they are blaming Foster and Monroe for the bombs and Rachel, Miles, and Aaron (Zak Orth) all know that isn’t the truth. This proves to Rachel that she isn’t being paranoid and that Randall was part of a bigger conspiracy. She breaks into Truman’s office and comes across letterhead with the eye on it, and that’s what saves her when Ken almost kills her – she sees he has the same symbol on papers.

    Ken tells Rachel that he’s been a Patriot for seven years – but the blackout was over 15 years ago. So they’ve been working in the background for quite some time but not since before the blackout. He also reveals that they have been infiltrating many small towns – and no doubt exploiting others like Titus, so they can sweep in as the good guys, building support. Ken tells her that they want her – that they didn’t want him to hurt her. Clearly, the Patriots have plans for her. Rachel tells him she’ll go away and not say anything. Ken tells her “once you start, you never stop. It’s just who you are” – echoing what Gene says to her. I was sorry to see Jones go as I’d come to like Ken – but of course, that was the point – I was completely blind-sided by his betrayal.

    Miles goes over the wall and discovers that the Patriots already have all of Titus’s men, and he discovers Titus. Titus tells Miles he was betrayed by “Judas” – Garrett (Jason Douglas). Miles and Titus fight and Titus is killed – which is too bad because Titus was seriously creepy! But the character had served his purpose. Aaron meanwhile experiences visions of Miles. As we see Aaron’s perspective, Miles looks up and sees fireflies. When Miles is seemingly cornered, he sees swarm of fireflies. Aaron has another vision and the two men about to take Miles prisoner burst into flames as Aaron “watches,” allowing Miles to escape.

    Charlie is convinced that Monroe (David Lyons) is a sociopath and a killer, and she tells him so. She isn’t at all convinced by his declaration that he wants to try to make amends. She’s not at all convinced by him coming to her rescue but reluctantly concedes that she can’t get away from him.

    Tom (Giancarlo Esposito), meanwhile, is having trouble moving up in the ranks as his commanding officer, Cooke (Damon Carney), still doesn’t trust him and keeps giving him the crappiest assignments. Tom’s sequence opens with a great fight scene as well, ending with him losing a molar. A quick shout out to Jeff Wolfe, the stunt coordinator on the show for some really terrific action sequences already this season. Tom discovers Cooke’s drug habit and follows him to the drug house where he ties him down and demands no more crap details, a promotion, and where Jason (JD Pardo) is. He doesn’t know, and Tom kills him with an overdose. There’s a nice parallel of the scenes of Tom and Rachel cleaning up after themselves, hiding the evidence.

    The next day Allenford (Nicole Ari Parker) finds Tom taking charge of the troops in Cooke’s absence. She allows him to take the promotion, but lies and says that Cooke has been transferred to another camp – without missing a beat. Clearly, nothing is meant to tarnish the reputation of the Patriots. It was nice to see that Tom does actually have some feelings for Jason and is trying to find out where he is, presumably to be reunited with him, or at least make sure he's safe. Of course, it's also possible that Tom is simply concerned that Jason may blow his own cover.

    Rachel and Miles decide they have to do something and Miles vows not to let Rachel break everything again. The episode ends with Miles announcing that every occupation should have a resistance. The final shot is Monroe and Charlie closing in on Willoughby – no doubt to join the resistance. Tom should provide their contact on the inside. All in all, things are starting to come together for an exciting season. What did you think of the episode? Who else do you think might be a mole for the Patriots? Do you think Monroe can be trusted? What else do you think Aaron is going to be able to do? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

37 comments:

  1. Good review. I have to say I was a bit disappointed to find Titus miraculously still alive, only to be killed immediately--seemed kind of pointless that way, but as least, as you point out, we got a bit more of this delightfully creepy guy. I have to say, th eone guy Rachel turns to to confide in turning out to be on the other side was a bit of an eye-roller for me. Rather a cliche. And just once it'd be nice to see Rachel not manage to screw up....

    ReplyDelete
  2. debbie nava korhonenOctober 21, 2013 at 4:33 AM

    I do think that Gene is a patriot, but he loves his daughter very much and perhaps is a relucant patriot. Stephen is a wonderful actor. I am mad they cut the kissing scene from this episode, however the producers have reassured me there will be more "love" between Rachel and Miles.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Agreed on Ken being a sleeper. I haven't been liking the new season as most everyone else here, though, either, so ...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm still not sure how I feel about the relationship between Rachel and Miles. I'm still squicked by Miles being Ben's brother...

    ReplyDelete
  5. debbie nava korhonenOctober 21, 2013 at 2:49 PM

    I think they are are the only people who can love each other, they are both mass murderers

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good Review!

    I had a feeling they might turn around and kill Titus. I didn't see Ken coming, but it does kind of go along with Mile's and his protege Alec (or Alex was it?) last season!

    "Ken tells Rachel that he’s been a Patriot for seven years – but the blackout was over 15 years ago. So they’ve been working in the background for quite some time but not since before the blackout."

    This seems to be true in terms of some recruiting, but I still suspect, because of Randall's association with them, that they might still be responsible for the black out, unless there's a bigger fish than The Patriots??? At any rate I'll be curious to see how they were able to organize this...

    "There’s a nice parallel of the scenes of Tom and Rachel cleaning up after themselves, hiding the evidence."



    I REALLY like the way those scenes were put together and how both those characters ended up having interesting turn arounds and letting the audience know that these two do have things in common (I still have a bad feeling about Jason though, which could make them even more alike...)


    About Aaron: Really love that he is connected and has some control over the fire-nites, but I suspect that there will be limitations and/or side effects in order to keep Aaron from being the series 'cure-all' too quickly...I also think we could get to a point where we see that he is not the only one with this ability (speaking of leveling the playing field). Because of the Ben vision, along with the direct vision of being with Miles in "real time", I wonder if he will be able to see "the future" sometimes as well? At very least, he can use those fire-nites to "spy". I still wonder also if this technology is a convergence from the night of the Tower, or if this is Patriot Tech that Aaron just somehow "tapped" into???

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's no different than Miles going outside the town limits (by himself while injured) to see what's going on. I think a lot of the characters do stupid things, I just think Rachel is an easy target, because people tend to pick on women more than men in this area.


    In Rachel's defense, she keeps being told by her own father that's she's crazy and constantly makes bad choices, so I think she feels this need to prove herself, because at the heart of everything, I think the tech she and Ben had worked on is what made this all possible (and so there's just a never ending underlying guilt)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yeah, but Ben's the one that sold his soul to the D.O.D...Even though physically his disposition seems gentile and of peace, I think it's a mistake to think that the things he created (the technology) didn't end up doing some great disservice to the world...


    He helped create a new-old world where unfortunately survival of the fittest is a real must --and it's people like Miles, Rachel, Tom, and Sebastian have a better chance of surviving, because they can be ruthless. (but it's not to say that they don't need to redeem themselves, I'm just saying a lot of people in this show are killers one way or another)

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think this situation with Ken and Rachel is meant to be thematic in terms of paralleling her with Miles last season and his once son-like protege' Alec...


    I had thought there was a good chance that the writers would turn around and kill Titus once they revealed that he was hired by The Patriots, but I wasn't expecting it to be Miles!

    ReplyDelete
  10. debbie nava korhonenOctober 21, 2013 at 4:41 PM

    They cared about each before and during Rachel and Ben's marriage so it makes sense they would be togther

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think that Aaron's connection is some kind of failsafe that Ben built in to the Nanotech or some offshoot of what happened at the tower - or some combination of the two. I think it's going to take him a while to figure out how to control it. I wonder if the nanytes will act like an AI entity - almost like Aaron has a computer in his head now too. I love Aaron - so more of him is always a good thing for me!

    I thought this episode was really nicely put together.
    I think the Patriots were behind the blackout in some way, but I wonder if it went the way they thought it would - I wonder if they realized it would take them this long to gain control back. Maybe the other leaders popping up took them by surprise? I'm really looking forward to how this is going to play out...

    ReplyDelete
  12. I agree - we are all hard on Rachel - and women characters in general. But the way they've characterized her from Gene was as the bad girl who was always hooking up with the wrong guy until Ben... Well, I think everyone is forgetting that she is a brilliant scientist in her own right - was he not proud of her scholastic achievements? I do like that they let the women physically defend themselves - they aren't just the damsels in distress.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I agree that 'the scientific part' does make her mistakes look more ridiculous, but another line of thought might be that despite that she's a brilliant scientist, she clearly has emotional problems(and therefor like so many great people are flawed)...

    But the way Gene is reminds me all too much of Christian Sheppard (and a bit of Dr. Edward Porter -"Felicity") and the relationship he had with his son Jack with Jack feeling like 'he was never good enough', which is why he strove to try and "fix" things.

    Rachel, like Gene, went into a scientific field and we don't really know why that is or where their relationship is coming from, let alone the lack of mentioning of Rachel's mother...

    In LOST EM's character Juliet always lost "loves" and a lot of her problems stemmed from her parents divorce and her sister having cancer, but ultimately that becoming a fertility specialist she was giving people love/families trying to make up for the ones she lost (her original family and her failed marriage). The only reason I bring the last part up is because Rachel is looking more and more like Juliet...

    ReplyDelete
  14. Definately. I knew the minute they switched out Andrea Roth for Elizabeth Mitchel and then demoted and wrote out Anna Lisa Philips, that Miles and Rachel would be the long term love interest, which I have absolutely know problem with! :)

    ReplyDelete
  15. " think that Aaron's connection is some kind of failsafe that Ben built in to the Nanotech..."


    You're probably right about this, considering his first vision related to the death of Ben and because these nanites ultimately became a form of 'life extension'!!!


    I love the AI idea alot! Aaron was one of my favorite characters from the beginning so I'm glad he gets to have this neat power and perhaps personal exploration! :)

    ReplyDelete
  16. I find it curious that, at least so far, Aaron's visions have been limited to the Matheson brothers. He had the vision of Ben, which is understandable, he considered Ben a friend, and the vision was little more than a replay of Ben's death scene. Aaron witnessed that so he can easily recall that scene from his memory and change the dialogue.

    The other two times he "sees" through the firefly-nanites are both connected to Miles, one in the holding cell area of Titus' stronghold, and then when the guards burst into flames when they caught Miles near the train yard.

    At first I thought the firefly-nanites might be protecting anyone who was with Aaron in the Tower, but there were none of them around when Rachel was in danger in the scene with Ken.

    Which begs the question, are the firefly-nanites also connected to Miles in some way which is why they are following him; or is there some as yet unknown connection between Aaron and Miles that forges the connection.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Great points! Could the nanites (what ARE we calling them!?) be connected to the Matheson brothers through DNA? Aaron didn't have any reason to suspect that Rachel was in trouble, but he did know that Miles was scouting over the wall, right? So maybe they are keyed in to what Aaron is thinking about. They did follow Rachel when she went to rescue Miles after all - though they didn't do anything...

    ReplyDelete
  18. debbie nava korhonenOctober 21, 2013 at 7:40 PM

    True, excpet they have killed thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions but ultimately is is their history that dictates their relationship and the fact that Billy and Elizabeth have great chemistry!!!

    ReplyDelete
  19. debbie nava korhonenOctober 21, 2013 at 7:41 PM

    He knew Miles went over wall because he was in kitchen when Miles told Rachel. but I do think its because they were all in the tower togther is the reason they are connected

    ReplyDelete
  20. Not a Spoiler alert unless they come true #####**********
    WARNING*****
    yeah aarons new wife= a sleeper!
    just out of the blue( using LOST writers formula ) at anytime someone can be a sleeper, convenient huh!
    And they have gone so low as to introduce super power NANO man! this will get outlandish and even more carzy than the concept of the show.... pow no more electricty, what about the electricity going through every HUMAN!!!!!
    BORING!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  21. I agree with you. However, one thing that bothers me a bit is that I feel that we never got the proper payout to what happened between them after Miles turned Rachel over to Monroe. In fact, the whole thing still confuses me (although I admit I didn't watch the show as attentively as I do now back in season 1). Rachel left the camp (and Ben and the kids) to meet Miles who turned her over to Monroe (was Miles' motivation ever made more clear than him wanting her to help them get the power back on for themselves?). When reunited, they were on bad terms but it is not clear to me when Rachel forgave him like this.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I agree a lot with the last part of this comment that Rachel looks more and more like my beloved Juliet (I still haven't found a female character that comes close to how much I adored her). Also, nice point about Jack and Juliet. I always loved how Lost made it so that they tried it together in the flashsideways and it didn't work either, even in the real world, I thought it was a nice touch that showed that it wasn't because of the circumstances that they didn't end up together despite all their similarities (they are both my favorite characters from Lost by the way) but rather because it wasn't meant to be.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Thanks.

    I always believe the beginning of the FS is showing us a glimpse of '2004' of the next corporeal time lime and that the reason it didn't work for them, is because it didn't work for them in probably several past incarnations, but they both were rewarded and seem to remain friends due to their son. But I always liked and thought that Juliet would be with Sawyer and Jake with Kate simply because I felt Jack and Juliet were meant to make the 'criminals' into better people...

    ReplyDelete
  24. No. The exact circumstances of that exchange still remian unknown. That's why I do hope we get more flashbacks from all across the board, because there are still things that are not clear that might be beneficial to know! LOL!

    I think she forgave him (or is trying to forgive him) because he took care of Charlie and he came to rescue her and then eventually added her in the quest of the Tower. In in some ways Miles has been proving himself to her by being loyal.

    ReplyDelete
  25. debbie nava korhonenOctober 22, 2013 at 2:56 PM

    I think she began to forgove him while captive, she told him in 1x13 "you need to take better care of charlie than you ever did of me" implying she was cared for by him while capative at least that is impression i get

    ReplyDelete
  26. I disagree with that about that if only because I felt that Kate also made Sawyer a better person even before Juliet (and I am a huge Juliet and Sawyer fan, and also Jack and Kate fan).

    ReplyDelete
  27. Yep, you're right! That does seem like the first verbal recognition!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Ok that's good to hear because I thought it was me who missed something important ahah

    ReplyDelete
  29. See I didn't because they both made it easier for each other to continue to be criminals (their was too much acceptance)and so neither tried harder to please the other, instead Kate and James kept on stealing and using each other. They loved each other because they understood each other, but neither made the other change and take a good hard look at themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  30. But that was not the only reason, as I just explained, but more over looking at their relationship up to season three I didn't see either one of them be better by being together. Saywer refused to go back for Jack, which I think really sealed the deal with them, because I think Jack would have gone back for Saywer, even if it were for Kate's sake. Maybe if Kate stayed and Juliet left things could have been different, but there is just no evidence to prove that it was each other that made them better, as Kate and James I guess both relied on strong leader pushing them and those other personal changes...

    ReplyDelete
  31. Don't forget that when Cynthia was attacked, Aaron was killed, so I think the nanites were trying to warn him. I think it's definitely a symbiotic kind of relationship. I think the nanites are able to bond with Aaron because they are based on his research - so they think of him as "dad" - and I think they were hopped up by whatever happened in the tower - especially if we go back to the tower tarot card which symbolizes change. I'm sorry you don't like Aaron - I'm afraid he's long been a favorite of mine and I think this storyline has legs... But there's lots of other storylines that are getting exciting too...

    ReplyDelete
  32. Oh, I have very little doubt about that....

    ReplyDelete
  33. I've been hard on some of the dumb things Miles has done as well, but the funadmental difference between the two of them on this front is that Miles is actually a trained soldier, and Rachel isn't. Him engaging in risk-taking expeditions makes a lot more sense than her doing it (but yes, with that hand injury, going out as he did was bone-ass dumb). Don't get me wrong--I WANT to like Rachel (and I am a big Elizabeth Mitchell admirer). Rachel's attempts to do action-oriented stuff would be a lot more palatable if oneof the show's recurring tropes vis a vis such attempts is that she almost never manages to succeed. Search the mysterious Patriots' office: get caught. Tell one guy what you really think: he's a mole. Etc. C'mon, writers, give her a break! (At least they did let her rescue Miles--but not without a bunch of guys along to do the heavy lifting...).

    ReplyDelete
  34. That's a good point. In this case it is more reasonable for Miles to do that. It would be nice if they cut her a break, but I also know there's kind of spectrum here with military characters and scientist arche types with Rachel being a notch above Aaron, because she's not afraid to use weapons/brute force, but yet she's not military trained (But that bomb thing last season with Monroe was pretty crafty).

    I just think the have this spectrum so that all none of the characters are the exact same and don't always have the same problems at the same time. Hopefully if we get into more back story with her dad and that situation, will she rise a little more to the occasion and be successful and more level headed...But I think she's in an unstable place, a place she's been in for a long time and that hopefully in time the writers will progress this along...

    ReplyDelete
  35. Sawyer changed into James the minute he killed John's father. ("The Brig") So in that I agree he started being a better person, but that includes letting Hugo stay on the helicopter and he kissed Kate goodbye because he knew that she really loved Jack and that probably she would have a better life without him, but made sure she would help Cassidy/Clementine (It's kind of a lot to ask Kate, actually)...If Kate loved him back, she could of got off too, but she didn't...It's after this is when Juliet and James realize they're in the same boat (but I think there was chemistry the first time she tazed him), as Kate really doesn't change until we get closer to the finale season (when she became a mother)...Ultimately it was Kate's role to save Claire and Aaron and forgo the love of her life..

    But I think the bigger picture was that these things happen, because of several lifetimes (time lines) in dealing with the Island they had already gone through. (whatever happened happened + people are variables = evolution)

    ReplyDelete
  36. Don't misunderstand me. I agree with you 100% that it was always Sawyer-Juliet and Jack-Kate but I think that your notion that it is only because they were unable to grow and become better people with the other combination is a wrong notion. As you've said, Sawyer was already James and I think that has to do both with the events of The Brig and with Kate. Juliet surely emphasized that even further, but I don't agree that the overall outcome could not have been achieved with Kate.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I think we start with the premise that the nanites (and I have no idea what to call them either!) are linked to Aaron in some as yet undefined way. I think there's pretty much agreement on that point. So, then the question is when do the nanites interact with him and why?

    If we use the Miles example with the guards bursting into flames then it could be whenever someone either in the Tower or close to Aaron is threatened. Remember, they showed Aaron noticing the nanites just before Cynthia was attacked, but it was less defined then in the scene with Miles.

    The nanites did not alert Aaron that Rachel was in danger from Ken, so perhaps that ties into your suggesting that Aaron has to have some reason to be thinking of the person for the nanites to follow them. He knew Miles was outside the walls, he didn't know Rachel was speaking with Ken.

    And that ties into the Ben vision as well, Aaron has to be thinking a lot about the situation and wondering what Ben knew or what Ben did that might have caused the current situation.

    I just hope we get some answers soon. I'm not overly fond of the entire nanite story line and I've never been overly fond of Aaron, so connecting the two usually result in scenes I fast forward over during an episode rewatch.

    I keep saying that Aaron was dead for 2.5 hours in the season opener, and now with this nanite business I'm wondering if Aaron is even still Aaron at all. I think it's possible that the nanites have a symbiotic relationship with him and Aaron really dead and the nanites have only reanimated his corpse as a host to interact with the people around them.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.