Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Reign 1.02 "Snakes in the Garden" Review


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Reign 1.02 "Snakes in the Garden" Review

Oct 28, 2013

Share on Reddit
  
      The second episode of Reign, “Snakes in the Garden,” was written by executive producer Laurie McCarthy and directed by Matt Hastings. McCarthy’s previous credits include GCB, The Ghost Whisperer, Felicity, and Beverly Hills 90210. Hastings latest projects include Warehouse 13, Alphas, and Eureka. Both have experience in dealing with supernatural type elements which seem like they will factor predominantly in the Gothic stylings of the show.

    Much of the criticism aimed at the show is over its historical accuracy. I would have to say that the show is based in history rather than historically true or accurate. I have a bigger problem with the modernization of things like customs and clothing. The clothing, in particular, is quite jarring at times, such as the scene in which the ladies in waiting appear in their nightclothes – one seems to have come straight from Victoria’s Secret.

    So far, for me at least, the most interesting elements of the show are the Gothic overtones. I'm really not interested in the teen melodrama. The fact that the mysterious girl in the hidden passageways – itself a common trope of gothic fiction – is named Clarrisa is clearly a shout out to the novel of the same name by Samuel Richardson. The book is one of the acknowledged classics of English literature and is one of the longest epistolary novels (written as a series of letters) ever written. It’s the story of a young woman whose quest for virtue is continually thwarted by her family. That aspect of the story certainly resonates with themes brought up in the episode as Kenna (Caitlin Stasey) uses her virtue to control the King’s (Alan Van Sprang) advances. Virtue is the “asset” that Catherine (Megan Follows) tries to take away from Mary (Adelaide Kane) through the plot with Colin (Ashley Charles).

    The storyline of Francis (Toby Regbo) and his marriage alliance with Mary is nicely mirrored and deepened through Prince Charles (Peter DaCunha) and Madeleine (Vanessa Carter). The episode re-addresses the issues surrounding a royal alliance and we also get insight into what Francis and Mary’s first meetings might have been like.

    One interesting twist was the implication that Sebastian (Torrance Coombs) might have some links to or even be a Druid. Perhaps they are setting him up to be the real resistance against Nostradamus (Rossif Sutherland). What is going on in the woods? Again the spooky atmosphere and supernatural elements are clear tropes of the gothic.

    Catching the woman who was apparently wearing the poisoned dress in Simon’s (Luke Roberts) bed seemed like unnecessary drama. The tendency to turn this into Gossip Girl is the least interesting aspect of the show for me. I’m also pulled out of the story every time we hear music. Not only is it not even remotely period specific, it doesn’t seem to have anything to do with the action.

    So far, I’m not really hooked on the show. I’m committed to giving it a few more episodes to find its stride, however. I’m hoping for more of the gothic storyline and some better choices in music. I’m also not sold on the Francis/Mary storyline – will he or won’t he? Does he love her or not? I’m not seeing any consistent characterization in either character yet. I find myself wanting to like Francis but keep being stopped by his flip flopping. Again, he’s flip flopping between French court concerns and mores for royal alliances and modern day theories of love and romance – and that just doesn’t work. It was very much a different time.

    What are your thoughts so far on the series? Am I being too hard on it? Should we simply suspend our disbelief and accept that this is fiction and not fact? Let me know your thoughts in the comments!

9 comments:

  1. I don't think you're being hard enough on it, but then, I'm a grinch.Historical fiction is one thing, historical fantasy quite another.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well I like the show (I will post my review wednesday) and I do not think you are too hard on it. It is just you perception of the show and it is nice to have different thoughts about Reign.
    Yes, the costumes are not good and I was quite shocked when I saw the girls in their nightclothes. I liked the music in the pilot but here, nothing really good...
    I read the script a few month ago and I was waiting for the gothic intrigues (it was in the script but not on the pilot). It is the most intriguing (and best) intrigue yet with the plots between France/England/Scotland.
    But I think you really need to accept Reign as a fiction. But even if the show is fiction, it does not excuse everything like the clothes !!!!!!!!! Reign would have been better if the show was not inspired by real persons of History.
    After all, Reign is a soap and with this episode, I'm glad it's not a Gossip Girl like show.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love the show, and while you do not, that is ok. I don't mind the clothing or the historical inaccuracy. It is after all a fictional show and they've never claimed it to be any different. If I remember correctly they said something like 'It is a fictional telling of Marys life'. I don't remember the exact quote though.


    You're allowed not to like something, but as I know so many do or did they bashed the show in its Tumblr tag and for those that do enjoy the show that ruins things a bit. Of course you're allowed to share your feelings and thoughts, but we have anti tags for that + it's not neccessary to tag hate either.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wasn't hooked to it when I saw the pilot but after seeing the second ep, hell this show is good.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I liked the show despite the clothing and the inaccuracies. I think the pilot actually had some pretty good music, but this second episode not so much. I think Francis does like Mary (he almost kissed her and stood up to his mother for her) but he is also torn between his love of France and her. He also seems jealous of the Portuguese Prince in the next episode. Who was the boy in the beginning? And who rescued him

    ReplyDelete
  6. It is actually not that historically inaccurate. It's the wanton mashing up of history and modern sensibilities that jars for me. I was actually a big fan of Gossip Girl - I especially watched for the shoes... But here, I want to see real period costumes and I want period music.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm glad you love it - and I never said that I hate it. But there are specific things that I feel deserve to be criticized. I do believe it has potential - but I think it could go either way. And, in fact, they do claim it to be at least based in history - just look at the tag line on the wallpaper...

    But it's my review and these are my observations. That said I certainly respect your opinion here too.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The boy in the beginning was Colin. And he wasn't actually rescued - as they later find his body in the forest. Nostradamus had him killed for Catherine.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Just because it says rise of Mary queen of scots on the poster/wallpaper doesn't mean they are claiming it is accurate. They've said it in countless interviews that while it is based on people in history the story itself is fictional.
    I didn't say you hated it, just that some people do. Like I said, it's ok not to like it :)

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.