Rachel/Mike is so backwards IMO. He is the one complaining/making demands yet he is the one that lied to her about harvard etc shouldnt she be the one mad not mike?
so many clips, got a headache trying to make sense of it, can't believe Ava screwed them over but I have enjoyed her arc this first half of the season it was more intriguing than the case of the week in season 1
Looks Good. Will be interesting to see if they replace Rachel with a new character as they obviously wouldnt keep showing Stanford every so often. It makes sense for her to move on to there though as she wants to be a Lawyer.
As for Ava screwing them over? A 'simple' case got turned into murder charges and others due to animosity between Harvey and his former DA boss.
NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.
...woah! This looks intense :-| .
ReplyDeletedonna visiting stephen in prison!!
ReplyDeleteRachel/Mike is so backwards IMO. He is the one complaining/making demands yet he is the one that lied to her about harvard etc shouldnt she be the one mad not mike?
ReplyDeleteOh please, let her go to Stanford ...
ReplyDeleteWhy doesn't Rachel just go to Columbia?
ReplyDeleteLooking good!
ReplyDeleteso many clips, got a headache trying to make sense of it, can't believe Ava screwed them over but I have enjoyed her arc this first half of the season it was more intriguing than the case of the week in season 1
ReplyDeleteLooks Good. Will be interesting to see if they replace Rachel with a new character as they obviously wouldnt keep showing Stanford every so often. It makes sense for her to move on to there though as she wants to be a Lawyer.
ReplyDeleteAs for Ava screwing them over? A 'simple' case got turned into murder charges and others due to animosity between Harvey and his former DA boss.