Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Supernatural - More details about Spin-off


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Supernatural - More details about Spin-off

Jul 30, 2013

Share on Reddit
Thanks to Elena for the heads up.
But as buzz continued to build about Supernatural’s upcoming spin- off executive producers Jeremy Carver and Robert Singer yesterday shared with EW some new info about the spin-off, which is currently scheduled to be introduced to viewers in episode 20 of the upcoming new season.

In the Chicago-set episode, Carver said we’ll be introduced to a show that would, if picked up by the network, “explore the clashing monster and human characters” living in the city. In fact, he said, “we’ll have main characters who are both human and monsters.” That will include, added Singer, “families of monsters and families of hunters.” “It’s much more of an ensemble than Supernatural ,” Singer said.

Read more at EW

47 comments:

  1. I'm still shaky about this. I'd love to be proven wrong though.

    ReplyDelete
  2. With what has been said about this show so far I'm getting sorta getting an Angel type of vibe.

    ReplyDelete
  3. CW is really obsessed with spin-offs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well they only have three shows that are really working TVD, Arrow and Supernatural. They know that Jensen and Jared have been on a long time and they have to plan for the chance that they will both leave after their contract is up at the end of season 10. So, they are getting a head start on it now. Plus if the spinoff clicks, they don't HAVE to work as hard to keep Jared and Jensen onboard Supernatural. It's a strategic move.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Me too and I think that is a very good thing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'd say they are really obsessed with keeping the network from folding in 2 years. Spin-offs of successful shows need less marketing and already have in-house generated interest. The simple fact is that the CW must have more successful shows to survive. It currently has 3. The easiest way to get that audience to watch other things on the network is to tie in with what they are already watching.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm getting more and more curious about this. This seems like the kind of spin-off that takes the existing mythology and delves deeper into it, looking at it from different angles similar to what OuaTW in doing - same mythology, different approach.
    I've always thought that there should be more to the monsters than just being the job of the week and the show kind of adressed that with S6 but I think they've barely scratched the surface and that there is much more to tell.

    ReplyDelete
  8. start_wearing_purpleJuly 30, 2013 at 5:03 PM

    Kinda sounds a bit like what Angel was compared to Buffy where there was more of the monster subculture being explore. So let me guess... one of the main characters will be a hunter who just happens to have a problem around the full moon.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So annoying.

    They are using the glorious name of Supernatural to cover a Being Human rip off, and there will be no Jared and Jensen to sweeten the pot but some family with half-monster kids or something. Oh well

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mr. Carver and Mr. Singer, here's a cool idea: Make a spin-off set as a prequel to the events of Supernatural, about Bobby and Rufus hunting together with some other hunter cameo's that you have mentioned or not shown quite enough in the series (John Winchester, Caleb, William Harvelle, Daniel Elkins, Lee Chambers etc.). You have basically everything set up:
    - Two popular and loved characters that share a past (lots and lots of events you could show, like what exactly happened in Omaha), make a great hunting duo, similar attitudes like Sam and Dean,
    - The lore, the setting, everything is already established in SPN, you don't need a "back door pilot",
    - Explore clashing monster and human character? What precisely do you want to explore? When both clash, either one or the other loses his head.
    - Expand Bobby's past, his relationship with Dr. Visyak, maybe even see a young Sam and Dean
    - How did Rufus become a hunter? Show the moment when he helped Bobby with his wife and they met,
    And much much more... seriously just think about all the possibilities.

    But most of all, it's a safe idea. Otherwise you can risk the city monster nonsense and share the fate of the Bones spin-off. "The Finder" where sadly, the only thing he couldn't find was an audience.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Leaning towards I probably won't like it, but still trying not to judge until I see it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. something like being human¿? that what it sounds like

    ReplyDelete
  13. Now THIS sounds more promising! So could we have some of our angel family back? Like say Richard Speight Jr? Demore Barnes? Rob Benedict? And what about our vampire family? Papa himself, Rick Worthy? Ty Olsson? And for hunters - how about Kim Rhodes? Sheriff Mills needs to get out of South Dakota!! The windy city seems like a perfect upgrade!

    ReplyDelete
  14. any one else not interested in this at all?

    ReplyDelete
  15. The monsters will only be main characters until Dean pops over for an episode and kills them all. Only he is allowed to have monster friends, dammit!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Glorious? Maybe in season 4.

    ReplyDelete
  17. As longs as they don't change out the rock music for pop/rap/hip-hop, count me in.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Haha completely agree!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Different strokes.

    Maybe it wasn't continuously 'glorious' but up until the end of season seven, I certainly enjoyed it.

    Season four wasn't one of my favourites, but everyone's taste is different.

    ReplyDelete
  20. It gives them a chance to delve back into the urban legends that have been left behind for so long. We could also get a bigger variety of monsters other than just demons and angels, which have taken up so much focus. I think the menagerie of monsters they can add to this show is fascinating.

    ReplyDelete
  21. The only thing I really disliked about season 4 was the way the narrative treated Sam.


    Also the show stopped even pretending to try and be scary afterwards. It felt more like an action/drama than horror/supernatural/drama.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Oh no, no...werewolves are getting so tired now. How about zombie with a soul? :-P

    ReplyDelete
  23. This is my ideal spin-off also but alas it is not going to be. I still live in hope for a Bobby-Rufus prequel movie though.

    ReplyDelete
  24. again please no spin offs, i don't want to get in to it, so don't make me, it makes me because i want to follow a continuity. down vote appreciated i for once want to be at the very bottom i think.


    first we have in supernatural: being half is not a good thing aka SAM, being friends with monsters is not a good thing, both SAM and DEAN, with Benny and Jules(from Firefly) who play some monster friend of SAM. both ended badly. and now this spin off is going to air in between Supernatural, and Sam and Dean gonna look at them for a episode and are gonna leave that town saying its cool they are doing good? yea way to make me believe(assumption i know, sue me).

    ReplyDelete
  25. Now that really would make it like Angel.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I hope this is related to the MoL. Maybe Sam and Dean start recruiting for the MoL again.

    ReplyDelete
  27. This could be very good. Could possibly surpass the mothership if they get some decent writers on it. After all, Angel became a much better show than Buffy (I still want to know what the Buffy writers were smoking in seasons 4,6, and 7).

    ReplyDelete
  28. I know you're probably kidding but ... Oh God, no. No more humanified zombies! Sick of Hollywood mucking around with my favorite classic monster!

    ReplyDelete
  29. I hated season four. Didn't much like season five, either, but the angels and whatnot have to be my least favorite bit intro'd into the mythos of this series.

    ReplyDelete
  30. This site needs a "wins the Internets" button. Because this? Is the show most fans would want to see.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Exactly what it sounds like to me. The shine wore offa that show with me after the first season. I couldn't bother with the UK version after they recast Annie. She was the entire reason I lobbied to get the show picked up.

    ReplyDelete
  32. After this announcement, my inclination to bother with a pilot dropped by about 50 points. I only had 51 points of interest in it to begin with ...

    ReplyDelete
  33. It's going to be a soundtrack comprised of nothing but Chicago songs.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Nah, I am equally sick of vampires, werewolves, and zombies. I would love to see some new monsters.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Season 4 blamed Sam for not being OK after seeing his brother die. And they had Dean not being happy that Sam was not OK after the deal he put him through. So right from the off we had a offensive Dean towards Sam and it set the tone for the season and then we had Sam's story in the background so we can have the developing Dean and Castiel relationship . And screw it wether the audience either cared or sympathized with Sam just so we can have a scapegoat for all that was wrong . Not a fan of season 4 .

    ReplyDelete
  36. Just after reading this. make what you will of it.:)
    X

    [I think what makes it different than other spinoffs is generally you
    spin characters from an existing show [to a new series],” Singer noted.
    “This spinoff, while Sam and Dean get us into [the story], it’s an
    entirely new cast of characters in a totally new environment. And it’s
    actually a different concept than SUPERNATURAL: SUPERNATURAL is a road
    show, this is very urban; it’s a very ensemble cast, and it stays in one
    place — Chicago — and it’s a little Shakespearean, a little DALLAS.”]

    ReplyDelete
  37. Yeah, the angels have turned out to be one of the worst thing introduced and there seems to be no way to get rid of them; now they've invaded the Earth too.:)
    I felt so sorry for Sam and for the brothers' relationship in season four; ,and season five was depressing but the srory-lines had a logic and a reason so I'm okay with them

    ReplyDelete
  38. Sam was treated badly, but he was originally designed from the beginning as the 'sweet little brother who had a vein of evil in him' and he had to walk down that thorny path, which he did, but he never lost that sweetness even when he seemed to have capitulated.to evil

    I admire him even more for having touched bottom and having pulled himself back to the surface.again.
    X

    I agree that SPN went from horror to action/drama but now it's no longer even that. .Now it's an illogical mish -mash.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Black In Black Tricksteress 95July 31, 2013 at 8:36 AM

    First thought of reading this is Bobby, as a human hopefully. Main inhuman characters would be Anna? and you would think Metraton would have a substanial role to play because he's the baddie.
    Off the track..is the alpha vampire coming back? And I know it was said that the Amazons were gone but what if. I can really picture angels here but I'll haveto wait and see if there other species.

    ReplyDelete
  40. “It’s much more of an ensemble than Supernatural" now that is the one thing keeping me interested even if I stopped with the main show after S6. Having an ensemble with like regular female characters who don't get killed would be pretty good.

    ReplyDelete
  41. "Waving crazily from the back, an old volleyball injury creeps up and he has to sit back down, disappointed but sated."

    ReplyDelete
  42. I was really hoping that the spin-off was just a thought. Guess not. I'd really hate to see J2M leave the show.

    ReplyDelete
  43. I hope they delve more into the Shtriga from season 1, episode 18, Something Wicked. That was honestly one of scariest/creepiest episodes. Something about putting kids/babies in danger that freaks me out..

    ReplyDelete
  44. The more I hear about the spin-off the less interested I am. Supernatural without Dean and Sam? Really?? Good luck with that.
    I really thought "Bitten" made it clear that ratings drop if there isn't enough Dean and Sam, and you guys think that will work for 22 episodes?? Okay I get it, you love to waste money.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I'm still weary about this idea, but I'm absolutely on board with the format they're going with. Differentiating themselves from SPN as much as they can is the way to go. It can be a show that functions in the same world, and abides by the same rules, but is shouldn't be a SPN copy.

    So it's comforting to see that they're approaching this from the right angle. (Now I only wish Eric was somewhat involved in the spin off... for some reason that would put me more at ease)

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.