Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon POLL : What did you think of Revolution - Clue?
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

POLL : What did you think of Revolution - Clue?

May 21, 2013

Share on Reddit

-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

25 comments:

  1. Bryce NovarroMay 21, 2013 at 4:22 AM

    They wouldn't kill off Elizabeth Mitchell would they? I hope not cause if they do I am going to be really mad!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Historical_MaterialistMay 21, 2013 at 5:18 AM

    I'm sure there are a lot of people that will really like this episode. I'm not one of them. Overall the main plot points were there. Which really were only to get all of the players to Colorado and to provide exposition that there is more to the Tower than we understand: which is next to nothing to start with. Other than these plot points there was really not much point to pretty much the rest of the episode. Unless the producers plan on coming back to the possibility that Nora was brainwashed; I have a lot of trouble accepting that Nora endured interrogation and torture for twenty-one days. EVERYONE breaks and talks by the third day. So twenty-one days? Umm no. Not buying it. The writers used the twenty-one days to allow for Rachel and Aaron to walk to Colorado while suggesting that Nora might have been brainwashed and was the one committing the murders. But its lazy because they were as subtle as hammer by showing the blackouts and pointing to what's his face that interrogated her. We were supposed to think that Nora wasn't thinking straight and therefore the murderer. But it was a red herring because what's his name: Miles war buddy was the culprit all along. Surprise! Fooled us you did. Wow. But it was as effective as a deflated balloon because notice how I can't remember these people's names? That's how important they are to the show and how effectively they have influenced the viewer. In other words: they haven't. So what was the point of all that? To have Jason kill a guy for the first time? To throw some conflict between Romeo and Juliet? Oh and given that there NO OTHER FEMALE militia anywhere: how was Rachel able to just walk up to Monroe's tent completely unnoticed? Not the best episode.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AydrianMay 21, 2013 at 5:28 AM

    Use proper spacing to get rid of that wall of text and I might actually read it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. D. GizziMay 21, 2013 at 5:32 AM

    I have no trouble remembering the characters names: Miles' war buddy who
    was the killer is Jim Hudson. I totally suspected he was the mole from
    last week's preview. He hasn't been in the last few episodes, and then
    he's in this episode? Dead giveaway. They tried the red herring, as you
    call it, but having Commander Ramsey in the episode as well, but he
    hasn't been a significant enough player for his betrayal to be any
    impact on the other characters. Besides, Jim told Miles back in the
    episode "Ghosts" that Miles had ruined his life, and his wife wanted
    nothing to do with him because of his secret past. He was the only one
    with any real motive.

    And that wasn't the first time Jason has killed someone on the show. He killed the guy attempting to rape Charlie in the Pilot.

    If
    you watched the Monroe Militia camp closely you'd have noticed that
    they made a point of having female militia at the camp. I noticed it
    because it was so out of the ordinary. Yes, it was completely done to
    allow Rachel access to Monroe, but name a show that doesn't pull the
    same stunt of inserting something out of the ordinary when they need it
    for some plot devise.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Historical_MaterialistMay 21, 2013 at 5:33 AM

    Sorry. I should have printed it in pencil to bring it to your level.

    ReplyDelete
  6. D. GizziMay 21, 2013 at 5:33 AM

    No, they wouldn't...at least not until the season cliffhanger!! I'm KIDDING, I'm KIDDING. I suspect Rachel will have more lives than a cat before the end of the series, whenever that may be!

    ReplyDelete
  7. D. GizziMay 21, 2013 at 5:37 AM

    I have no trouble remembering the characters names: Miles' war buddy who
    was the killer is Jim Hudson. I totally suspected he was the mole from
    last week's preview. He hasn't been in the last few episodes, and then
    he's in this episode? Dead giveaway. They tried the red herring, as you
    call it, but having Commander Ramsey in the episode as well, but he
    hasn't been a significant enough player for his betrayal to be any
    impact on the other characters. Besides, Jim told Miles back in the
    episode "Ghosts" that Miles had ruined his life, and his wife wanted
    nothing to do with him because of his secret past. He was the only one
    with any real motive.

    And that wasn't the first time Jason has killed someone on the show. He killed the guy attempting to rape Charlie in the Pilot.

    If
    you watched the Monroe Militia camp closely you'd have noticed that
    they made a point of having female militia at the camp. I noticed it
    because it was so out of the ordinary. Yes, it was completely done to
    allow Rachel access to Monroe, but name a show that doesn't pull the
    same stunt of inserting something out of the ordinary when they need it
    for some plot devise.



    (I hope this isn't a double post. I THOUGHT I posted this successfully, but it seems to have disappeared.)

    ReplyDelete
  8. AydrianMay 21, 2013 at 5:49 AM

    Well that's one arrogant attitude...I'll have you know that I'M the arrogant one on this website and I'll not have you try to usurp my throne.

    I'm sure that employing the intelligence of a third grader might be well beyond your "considerable" abilities, but if that mess is something you consider to be a high level then I really weep for the educational system you had to endure.

    But hey, maybe I'm wrong. Standards are different everywhere. To you that might be a high level, but to people who actually read books that's quite abysmal.

    Now before acting like an arrogant ass toward someone who truly is an arrogant ass, use whatever intelligence you may possess and learn how to get your point across without looking lazy. Because what you typed above was lazy as hell, and it's deeply disturbing that you don't see that.

    ReplyDelete
  9. João PauloMay 21, 2013 at 6:56 AM

    Is not the best episode, just ok. I knew Jim is the mole, was to obvious and about Nora tortured for twenty-one days is hard even for her.

    This episode don't have a good character development (except for Nora and the relationship between her and Miles), but I intrigue with the people who appears inside the Tower.

    Rachel make stupid things again, I sure she is not dead, but maybe kill some milicia soldiers with the granade explosion.

    One good thing is Monroe threat Randall.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Dan KempnerMay 21, 2013 at 7:57 AM

    Honestly, this episode wasn't as good as the previous ones.

    I loved the opening montage of Nora's torture (not the torture itself, but the execution of the story), as I was afraid they'd be dragging her captivity for two or more episodes (a la Danny's storyline).


    Overall, though, I was kind of bored with the "Whodunnit"/"Clue" storyline, as it's ben overdone on so many other shows. At least it wasn't Jason..

    ReplyDelete
  11. YiyiMay 21, 2013 at 9:10 AM

    They wouldn't !!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. JessMay 21, 2013 at 10:39 AM

    They can't kill of Rachel! Elizabeth Mitchell is the best part of the show!!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Historical_MaterialistMay 21, 2013 at 12:54 PM

    Good morning. Looks like I hit a nerve. Tsk, Tsk. You know for someone who wasn't going ready my post because of it's sentence structure, it sure looks like you read it thoroughly. Now are you going to comment on the actual substance of the post or are you going to keep stomping around about how threatened you feel?

    ReplyDelete
  14. AydrianMay 21, 2013 at 2:06 PM

    You want me to read your post, but it doesn't seem like you actually read mine. I said I might read it if you could use those two extra seconds required to properly space your post. Calling my intelligence into question is very hilarious coming from you. It's a lot like a fat guy wearing a shirt that says "No fat chicks" on it.

    As for hitting a nerve, you didn't even come close to getting on my nerves. If you had then my comment would have been a lot longer. You are amusing, that's as far as you get. My town had a little tornado weather last night and you were a distraction.

    But now it's morning and the weather has passed and you're just sad. Acting like an ass on the internet because you can't be held accountable is just sad. So please, keep on replying. I really enjoy it when people respond like a jerk and then get defensive when someone calls them out on it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Historical_MaterialistMay 21, 2013 at 2:17 PM

    Just recall that it was YOU who chose to respond and start this. If you didn't like how the post looked then you could have ignored it like the majority of civilization. So someone is acting like an ass here alright. A righteous, self important ass that likes to wag fingers at people when its not their place to.

    ReplyDelete
  16. LizMay 21, 2013 at 2:30 PM

    Best reunion ever was rachel and monroe. Grenades are cool!

    ReplyDelete
  17. laura3341May 21, 2013 at 4:31 PM

    The best part was Rachel walking into Monroe's tent and flipping the pin out of the grenade.

    ReplyDelete
  18. João PauloMay 21, 2013 at 4:56 PM

    True hahahahah

    ReplyDelete
  19. Marlene RådmanMay 21, 2013 at 6:35 PM

    I thought the episode was OK. I would have liked to see some flashbacks from when Miles and Nora met or something with Miles, Bass and Nora. Some background would have been nice.

    ReplyDelete
  20. LizMay 22, 2013 at 6:19 PM

    Still smiling today because she made stupid things again! I think they need to rename the show "the stupid things Rachel can do".

    ReplyDelete
  21. LizMay 22, 2013 at 6:28 PM

    Agreed! I had to rewind that scene several time because it's just so funny that she walks right in and says "Hey". and he's like "don't do anything rash". Really Monroe you forgot she stabbed someone with a screwdriver in your presence before? The grenade shouldn't be something out of the ordinary lol.

    ReplyDelete
  22. YiyiMay 23, 2013 at 1:15 PM

    it just crossed my mind that maybe Monroe's waiting for her??? Obviously he knew Rachel is around somewhere but he just couldn't find her, and about his plan to the Tower, Randall couldn't open that door but Rachel may have her own way? It's possible that Monroe's well prepared for Rachel's coming:)

    ReplyDelete
  23. YiyiMay 23, 2013 at 1:16 PM

    or at least we should make a list lol

    ReplyDelete
  24. LizMay 23, 2013 at 2:16 PM

    Lol

    ReplyDelete
  25. LizMay 23, 2013 at 3:27 PM

    That probably is true, I dont think he was prepared for the grenade.

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.