Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon CW - Women 18-34 ratings for CW premiere week - 90210,Hart of Dixie lowest!
Sign Up


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Get In Touch
 Join SpoilerTV
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

CW - Women 18-34 ratings for CW premiere week - 90210,Hart of Dixie lowest!

16 Oct 2012

Share on Reddit
Vampire Diaries 2.5
Beauty & The Beast 1.6
Arrow 1.3
Supernatural 1.0
Gossip Girl 0.8
90210 0.7
Hart of Dixie 0.7
-
Sign Up for the SpoilerTV Newsletter where we talk all things TV!

33 comments:

  1. TarotManiac17 October 2012 at 00:59

    Wow, 3 of the most geared to women 18-34 shows got the lowest rating, ironic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nicolás Festa17 October 2012 at 01:00

    Whoa! Wait a sec! If, for example, Arrow got a 1.3 in the 18-49 demo(which count both men and womans in between the ages of 18 and 49), how come that it got a 1.3 in the 18-34 demo between womans? All the people with Nielsen boxes who watched the show were all woman with 18-34 years?


    I odn't get this... At all... :S

    ReplyDelete
  3. DarkUFO17 October 2012 at 01:00

    No, it means that 1.3 % of all women in the 18-34 group watched arrow.

    ReplyDelete
  4. nellymendezcolon17 October 2012 at 01:00

    ..1.5 the beauty crap...wooow..pure curiosity people watch that first episode..on arrow i expected may be more a 1.8 aprox

    ReplyDelete
  5. omabin17 October 2012 at 01:00

    Wow at beauty and the beast

    ReplyDelete
  6. nellymendezcolon17 October 2012 at 01:00

    ..ok..low percent means more people watch that show...?????? i am CONFUSE

    ReplyDelete
  7. percysowner17 October 2012 at 01:00

    Arrow got 1.3 in the 18-49 demo. If I remember from TV by the Numbers they got 1.3 of 18-49 in women and 1.2 in 18-49 in men. So equal amounts of men and women ages 18-49 were watching the show. You don't add them together. I'm guessing the same approximate ratio held in 18-34 but since a long time ago the CW announced they are catering to the 18-34 women, they just announce those numbers. Frankly I think it is good that we have a balanced audience. Smallville used to do that when it started, I lost track of whether or not it continued to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  8. cmjamieson17 October 2012 at 01:00

    I expect Beauty and the Beast will fall and Arrow will rise. It's interesting that they chose the Green Arrow universe to use to make a new superhero show ... it has one of the most rounded set of characters, including two of the most compelling female superheros as regulars (Black Canary and Speedy) and a few others slated to make an appearance - such as Huntress.


    I think Arrow has the potential to rake in the very large group of women as it will satisfy several of the primary motivations, traditional and otherwise, associated with female viewership without alienating any of the male viewers or the females who tend to be more attracted to "male type" shows. Lots of human drama, romance and human interaction and no shortage of action and mythology.


    We shall see, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  9. CTR0517 October 2012 at 01:00

    I was a fan of 90210 for the first 3 seasons, season 4 was absolutely dreadful and I thought I would check out a few episodes of season 5 to see if it would improve...that premiere was just a continuation of the crap fest that was last season and last night, I completely forgot it was on (in favor of a Castle marathon on DVD...I'm new to that show and I'm hooked) and I realized I didn't care at ALL about missing it. I really think it's time for the show to be over but with Gossip Girl ending, I think it will get at least one more season.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Megan_B17 October 2012 at 01:00

    But the Twilight wannabe show got the higher too

    ReplyDelete
  11. tvmonkey17 October 2012 at 01:00

    they also had the lowest number of overall viewers, you have to have viewers of any kind before you can have ratings of any kind.

    ReplyDelete
  12. tvmonkey17 October 2012 at 01:00

    Just curious but are HOD and SPN's ratings for thier week 2 episodes or week 1? If these are from last week then they arent premier ratings for either show and I would imagine SPN would be down a little on this and HOD up a little?

    ReplyDelete
  13. tvmonkey17 October 2012 at 01:00

    if you're talking about TVD its been doing better than all CW shows in the womens demo for a few years now.

    ReplyDelete
  14. TarotManiac17 October 2012 at 01:00

    Twilight Wannabe? The Vampire Diaries novels came out before the twilight books. Also TVD premiered first

    ReplyDelete
  15. Megan_B17 October 2012 at 01:00

    I know, but its still the same ''vampires are so sexy at high school'' with a love triangle at the enver and all for teen girls

    ReplyDelete
  16. cmjamieson17 October 2012 at 01:00

    Twilight can *not* be considered to be the impetus for TVD. In fact, Twilight is, hands down, the most derivative work I have ever reviewed. What was changed from the source was not changed for the better, in my opinion. To wit: sparkly vampires. I mean ... really?


    That all said, there is no doubt that TVD cashes in on the wildly beating hearts of all the Bella Swann wannabes.


    Oi, I just shivered when I wrote that. I think I would tie my daughter to a basement wall and beat her everyday if she had a secret wish to be Bella Swan. .

    ReplyDelete
  17. cmjamieson17 October 2012 at 01:00

    Yeah.

    ReplyDelete
  18. KatHale17 October 2012 at 01:01

    You're right about the books,but actually VD premiered about a year after the first movie,around the time the second one was coming out.
    And I think the comment was about how VD benefited from the Twilight frenzy,which,no matter what we think about Twilight,is completely true.Even the actors themselves have said repeatedly(during the first year) that they have Twilight to thank for the show's success.
    Personally,I think that VD owes Twilight for the original success.Later it proved its own worth.

    ReplyDelete
  19. C P17 October 2012 at 01:01

    Pretty much exactly what I expected to see when I decided to check this out.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Megan_B17 October 2012 at 01:01

    exactly what I was saying it's the same thing. Seeing Twilight promo on tv or seeing the vampires promo on the CW, all I'm seeing is ''Come at us, look at the sexy vampires, how cute they are, look at the vampire love triangle how sexy it is''

    I don,t get it how even the teen girls aren't tired of the ''sexy vampire'' thing yet.......it was old after one year and it keep on coming back

    ReplyDelete
  21. tariqq17 October 2012 at 01:01

    yes this is last week and not for HOD or SN's premiere you are correct

    ReplyDelete
  22. smallville94417 October 2012 at 01:01

    Arrow is kinda dissapointing in W18-34 for a premiere that kinds makes me worry the show wont have strong longivity i hope it doesnt pull another ringer/secret circle and have great premiere ratings but dangerous numbers by seasons end

    ReplyDelete
  23. smallville94417 October 2012 at 01:04

    i think Mark Pedowitz said in the summer that the network cares about A18-34 so is it possible to get ratings in those demos for the CW?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Folie-lex17 October 2012 at 01:04

    Aw! HoD *sad face*

    ReplyDelete
  25. Dahne17 October 2012 at 02:32

    For the CW, that's a lot of women watching the Vampire Diaries. Good for them. It's nice to see any rating start with a 2 on the CW.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Dahne17 October 2012 at 02:36

    No. You always want a higher percentage. This number is measuring a subset of the normal demo numbers.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Dahne17 October 2012 at 02:37

    I expect both to drop in the coming weeks but it would be nice if they both settled above a 1.0.

    ReplyDelete
  28. rehabber17 October 2012 at 03:58

    I am surprised that Beauty beat Arrow and very sad that SPN is in 4th place.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Jazmin17 October 2012 at 06:24

    I hope so too.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Charlene Buchanan17 October 2012 at 14:46

    no dixie :( but ratings were bad last year for the first half so ...

    ReplyDelete
  31. Rebekah Mikealson18 October 2012 at 00:34

    TVD is not the same as twilight except for the fact that theres vampires and werewolves. Plus, TVD were based on books that came out before twilight books did

    ReplyDelete
  32. Rebekah Mikealson18 October 2012 at 00:36

    Well, you can actually see theres a complete difference between the vampires on this show. They actually burn instead of sparkle like fairies. The only similarity is the love triangle.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Megan_B18 October 2012 at 02:57

    go read my other answers^^; I knew about the books, doesn't change anything, still listen by the same teens that have fantasy with vampires and want to watch a 'vampire love triangle and drool in front of tv. The show only exist and work cause of those girls. Not to mention it and it was always promoted the exact same way than they do for twilight

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.