Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon American Horror Story - Episode 1.01 - Pilot - Review


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

American Horror Story - Episode 1.01 - Pilot - Review

6 Oct 2011

Share on Reddit
This review does not reflect the view of the majority of SpoilerTV readers. Continue at your own discretion… something that should be written on a sign placed on the door of that house.

American Horror Story starts off with two kids entering the House (which is like a character in its own right) after a girl with Down Syndrome tells them so nonchalantly, "Excuse me, you're going to die in there." The rest of the episode is the same way: characters talking in the most matter-of-fact ways about things that are so gruesome and terrifying, if done correctly, that Story basically treats them like nonissues. Topics like miscarriages and self-harm via cutting and lung cancer and murder are spoken of with such ease, you know the creators believed doing so that way would freak you out. Instead, it just puts you off. It's as terrible as a B-graded high school class project. And I'm not joking with you.

I took four years of "TV Production" in high school and I can genuinely say, I could have made this pilot. I don't know if I should feel happy about that or if it's just incredibly sad. But I'm betting on the latter.

The dialogue is completely one-dimensional (and not in a fun, satirical way), the camera movements and angels are completely premature (and not in a fun, satirical way), and the editing is so devastatingly half-assed — all of which are supposed to sell the audience into this creepy, horror genre but end up being the product of something you'd happen to stumble upon during a lazy Saturday night rummaging through crappy Netflix movies.

The only other Ryan Murphy show I have watched (and still do) is Glee, so I don't know if this is true for all of his shows, but the camera direction for both shows is eerily similar — and both shows are supposed to be completely different. The angles (those somewhat slanted ones), the editing (which is inexcusably quick), the movement (the zooming in from an establishing shot as if the tone is quirky and upbeat; they also do that one where they follow the character from behind you almost think they're carrying a slushie to throw in someone's face but instead they're about to get brutally jumped) are all so familiar that the only difference is the color grading of the actual video. I mention all of this because if you think the show will be good enough to watch based on cinematography alone: you're wrong.

And with that in mind, the score and the supposed tone of the show completely mismatch the production value. Lines like "I MADE A MISTAKE!!!!" cut out so quickly to the next line which is a soft whisper so constantly that it's aggravating, not freaky. And scenes jump cut so much with themselves it'll make you think something's wrong with your cable set top box connection. And the quick editing, flashing some horrific image that's suppose to elicit screams, is not scary. Not in the slightest. And I'm someone who doesn't like visiting haunted houses.

American Horror Story feels like Ryan Murphy and Brad Falchuk's way of finally being able to say "shit" on television as they try to get Dylan McDermott as naked as cable network will let them while simultaneously trying to freak you out with cry-masturbation and cry-sex. A latex-covered whatever-that-thing-was having sex with Vivien wasn't scary, it wasn't freaky, it was uncomfortable.

People in this show scream bloody murder things like "EAT IT OR I WILL KICK THE SHIT OUT OF YOU" while breezing through lines like "My mom had a brutal miscarriage" and then try to unsettle you with "I had the mongoloid" (referring to the girl with Down) with such reckless abandon it's completely careless and it's not good, not in any way.

One of the only good parts is Dennis O'Hare's performance but the show couldn't leave his acting on its own, they had to give him 70% full-body burn while flashing back to a homicide scene that looks like a child's pop up book and treats the crime as such, too. Constance, the maid, turning into a younger version of herself in front of Ben is as freaky as it is sexy (until you realize her actual age). And that's it.

American Horror Story is like Glee if the tiny bit of gravitas, or even normalcy, in that show was stripped away and what you were left with was a universe where anything goes and we're just supposed to put up with it solely based on its genre as if that's an excuse for anything. You probably didn't think any show could have less of a sense of reality and ground than Glee does, well it's as if Ryan Murhpy and company thought the same thing and said:

"Challenge: accepted."

You can read more of my reviews at NoWhiteNoise.com

20 comments:

  1. I know....I´m so surpriced that people like it. Sure, there are some really good actors, but that does me no good, when the dialog is poor and the whole 52 min felt rushed.
    It felt amateurish to me too. 

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like it,and it sure gave me the willies!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree!! It was awful and uncomfortable. Sadly I didn´t like any of it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I still don't know WTF I watched, but I really loved it!

    ReplyDelete
  5. We can hope.... but let's be honest...

    I don't think it's Murphy's shows that have deteriorated with age so much (although they certainly do), I think it is Murphy himself who has changed and stopped caring about the story as much as the statement.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The editing and cutting was weird, but I thought it was intriguing overall. I enjoy a good "horror" screen so I was pretty satisfied. I don't really get the rest of the gripe. And why would anyone watch a TV show just for the cinematography?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yeah everything you say is on point.  But. while I agree with you I'm still tuning in next week.  AHS is gonna be a sleeper hit.  Somehow the sum of its parts, crappy editing, decent performances, meh dialogue, crazy old chicks, nudity and teen angst-- kind of works.  And thank you FX, cause the networks wouldn't, couldn't, glance at a show like this.  

    ReplyDelete
  8. That scene didn't even make sense. Why would someone scream like that out of nowhere!? WHY WOULD SHE YELL ABOUT SMOKING AND THEN BE A COCAIN ADDICT!?!??!!! What is going on? And what person who abuses cocaine actually says, "I want my drugs!" WHAT? I just… I can't. There's just nothing grounded in reality on this show; it's so terrible.

    I'm watching until episode 4.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes, yes, a thousand times yes! I'm pretty sure we're the same person. The editing did nothing but just annoy me and it certainly didn't improve the story in any which way.

    At times the show was even incoherent.

    ReplyDelete
  10. We're obviously in the minority here. I just don't know how anyone could have actually liked it, to be honest. It was so amateurish (to me). I'm giving the show three more episodes, since I heard ep 4 starts to answer some mysteries but let's see how I feel once we get there.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think there was a misunderstanding, I didn't say "I mention all of this because if you think the show will be good enough to watch only for the cinematography…" I said "based on cinematography alone" as in it's so good that you'd even watch just for that alone.

    (Many people might say, "I'd watch for Connie Britton alone" etc but would find something else enjoyable.)

    That then transitions to the next paragraph, which starts out "with that in mind…" and airs the rest of my grievances.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I loved it. Best TV this fall.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Great review and could not agree more!

    It felt like the editing was done only for shock value and not to enhance the story. It usually played against the story and brought me out of it more thn into it. Like I wrote on the poll post for American Horror Story, it was like Murphy filmed a 2-hour pilot and was told to edit it down to 1-hour. He did it without thinking of story and just picked his favorite most "shocking" moments...

    The effect did the EXACT opposite of what he was trying to do (I assume), it was less shocking to me since it was expected. That's the problem with filming almost every scene to shock and for effect instead of story - It cheapens everything. 

    Creepy twins? Check.
    Unknown mutated monster? Check.
    Over-sexed old-lady? Check.
    BDSM sex gear? Check
    Body parts in jars? Check.
    Disturbing paintings in the house? Check.
    Centuries old decrepit basement? Check.
    Ghosts? Check.
    Delusional visions? Check.
    Inferences that the house is alive and a character? Check.
    Burn scars? Check.
    Dead animals? Check
    Suicidal teen? Check.
    Psychotic teen? Check.
    Creepy warning by a stranger of impending death? Check.

    The classic horror movie check list goes on with more I fail to mention I'm certain. And all of it happens within 45 minutes. It was overkill soaked in cliche marinade and then smothered in redundant sauce.

    That is not to say it was all bad...
    Some of the visuals were quite effective, the acting was pretty good from everyone too. Denis O'Hare stood out to me too.

    It certainly has some potential. If it slows down and starts telling the story that builds to a tense scene or a shocking scene I may keep watching. As it was, It was one disjointed scene after the next that had no built up tension and did not frighten me even once. The only thing shocking was that Connie Britton signed on to the project.

    Quite funny....
    American Horror Story Drinking Game...
    http://www.aoltv.com/2011/10/05/american-horror-story-drinking-game/

    ReplyDelete
  14. While i admit the editing was a little fast paced, i will say this show does have me intrigued, i want to know what's going to happen, what is happening, and whether or not any of this is real or not. Looking forward to the rest of the season.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yes, the whole time I'd see a scene from school with those seemingly crack-addicted screaming banshees randomly brutalizing the new kid it would remind me of glee (which I loathe) but like if it were on speed and all the kids were suicidal and drug addicts. ...where are the teachers?... and then the parts in the basement cutting back and forth...it was not very effective. It was stupid.

    If I didn't love Connie Britton so much... I'd have given up halfway through the pilot. Having said that, I'll stick around to see if there's actually anything to this story after all...

    Maybe this show will be the anti-Murphy: Unlike Nip/Tuck or Glee, it'll start off completely unwatchable and ascend from there? lol

    ReplyDelete
  16. No, I loved it as well :)

    Check out some of the comments on the Poll post http://www.spoilertv.com/2011/10/poll-what-did-you-think-of-american.html

    ReplyDelete
  17. Am I the only one who REALLY liked this show?

    ReplyDelete
  18. The show was greatly fast paced and seemed rushed to get to the shocking stuff and all the sex. But I'm surely intrigued and cannot wait to see what happens next.  I loved all the nods to other horror movies. 

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.