Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Ringer - Episode 1.02 - She's Ruining Everything - Review


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Ringer - Episode 1.02 - She's Ruining Everything - Review

Sep 21, 2011

Share on Reddit
Indulge me for a second during this long review, if you will, SpoilerTV readers because it's been a pretty good day.

Just two days ago, I was added to the list of writers here on the site, and I've already posted way too many reviews. Yet, no one has called me out on my prolificacy. (Okay, I can't lie to you, several of those were already written on my personal site.) Instead, someone said I was funny.

So, I can't tell if it's the funny compliment affecting my ability to critique or not but imagine my surprise when I turn on The CW at 9PM earlier tonight expecting another muddled, haphazard version of what's supposed to be a professional television series episode and being able to actually find really decent things to say about Ringer!

(Then, imagine my disdain in Ringer and The CW for not putting out any promotional stills for the second episode of their most-anticipated show of the season. Seriously, go check the SpoilerTV gallery for yourself. Thanks to this Sarah Michelle Geller fansite and kudos for being able to weed out an episode still, even if it's just one image.)

Let's examine what was wrong with the pilot episode of Ringer, as most of you agreed in the comments: (1) the music was completely mismatched; (2) the visual effects were god-awful; (3) the writing and directing was too casual for what should be a suspenseful show.

Music
Watching Bridgette wrap up that body and try to clean blood with a tarp (come on, Bridge!) while someone's walking into the loft, I was scared that we'd get some song comparable to Foster the People's "Houdini," (though, now, they're probably too mainstream for The CW) but instead the show decided to let the natural sound speak for itself. And I think the scene was better for it. And when Gemma walks in and her toes are thisclose to the dead body on the floor, that little intense sound effect was oh so pleasantly suspenseful. I found myself cheering on Ringer a little, if I might add, which was a bit eccentric.

That pleasantry was short-lived, however, as Bridgette decides to go home and find products to help clean up her mess and another indie soft rock song came on. What? Okay, seriously? This is no longer just fraud, she killed someone. This is murder. Can we please act accordingly and put music that's fitting?

Visual effects
Siobhan walking behind Bridgette in the flashback was done well, but the New York scenery during Bridette's taxi ride wasn't done too well, and you knew she was in a lot. (I believe they shot episode 2 and beyond in LA.) But it was such a short scene, and it was only a tiny portion of the screen, we can hardly be annoyed with those visual effects.

Direction and writing
The pilot episode of Ringer was directed by someone who's mostly directed shows like 30 Rock and Ugly Betty. Tonight's episode was directed by Rob Bailey, who's done procedurals like Without a Trace and CSI: (and The Wire). That compared with a succinct story this time made for immensely better execution in this second episode.

But just how stupid is Bridgette? Why would she call Malcolm to tell him she killed someone? And why would she be so close to leaving him a voicemail (you know, just the kind of evidence the FBI needs and just the kind of trail the mob can trace)? Thankfully, she erases the message before leaving it, but then they begin to share text messages. Why would they do this? It makes no sense to me. And if it makes no sense to me, someone who isn't exactly keen on murders and fraud, then why would it make sense to the people that are actually committing these actions? Obviously, this will be Bridgette's biggest downfall.

Story
Unimportant in the first episode was the story, mostly because we all knew what would happen thanks to the promos. Even so, the pilot was all over the place, and this episode brought it down to just one point: the body!

The focused plot allowed for better pacing and suspense than the pilot episode, considering everything was working towards the exposing of the body. Why she would keep it hidden in a loft is beyond me, though. And how she could forget to search for a cellphone or a wallet in his pants is iffy. Not to mention that she has money, and she had people moving stuff in her loft, so she could just have gotten someone to move it out of the apartment and onto some truck or car and drive to a body of water and dumped it. (Hm, maybe I do know about murder.) Regardless, I must admit I tensed up every time someone was closer to that dead body: when Andrew called about the party taking place in the loft, when blood was dripping at the corner, and when the party planners rolled out that carpet and Bridgette yelled "Stop!" I think my heart stopped beating for just a moment.

Ringer still has some problems, like why would Siobhan take money out of an account anyone, technically, has access to? If she was trying to hide away in Paris, wouldn't she have put money aside in some "offshore" account that no one could trace back to her? But despite its issues, I think I may be hooked — and when Bridgette opened that chest only to find it empty, I knew I had to be back next Tuesday.

I'm so on the bandwagon, I've been playing Adele's "Set Fire to the Rain" (the song featured in the promos) on loop the entire time I was writing this.

---

My reviews: NoWhiteNoise.com
Follow me: @MichaelCollado

9 comments:

  1. Thanks for the review Michael. I'm going to give Ringer one more episode but it's just not doing it for me at the moment :(

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you, Sharon :D

    I think you could get into it if you just have fun with it. Perhaps if they made the show more self-aware it could be guilty pleasure material.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you're a little harsh there. Most of her actions can be explained by, well, she's just freaking shot a person, and she should be scared, she should be confused and she shouldn't be able to think straight - it's not like she had killed anyone before. Yes she's assuming her sister's identity, but that and murder is two very different things.
    Also, I don't think having anyone moving the chest is good idea- sooner or later the police will find it, and then they will have possible eye-witnesses (heck just few month ago in my country a murderer got caught by hiring others moving the body, so no, it's not exactly the brightest idea)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I understand. It's easy to write off her moment of delusion for calling Malcolm after she killed someone as she was nervous or upset or whatever the case may be. But still, I don't feel like anyone acted as if killing someone was a huge deal and therefore it was hard to even believe that.

    "I killed someone... in self defense."
    "What? I'm going to get you."

    Imagine that in monotone and you could reenact the Ringer scene. The problem is we don't know whether or not she's never killed anyone, since this is that type of show, and I can't truly give her the benefit of the doubt, either. That combined with the fact the scene was acted so matter of factly makes her actions inexcusable to me. (I mean she was even considering chopping him up before breezily nodding her head against that idea.) And even if she was in the moment and called him spontaneously, she quickly realizes this is a mistake but then decides to text him continuously. What?

    As for the body, I can understand that it would be risky. But is it better to have a dead body lying down in the middle of a room that multiple people have access to? Once she put that body in a trunk (or chest or whatever you want to call it), it was perfectly concealed and it was her time to get rid of it. She has the resources, but I can understand her not knowing how to utilize those resources correctly. (The fact that she was so candid about leaving the body in the loft and going on a plane where she wouldn't have been able to hide it for however long she was gone is baffling.)

    But I still enjoyed the episode. I'll be back!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I liked the episode and you can definitely tell that it will get better and better. I tensed up every minute with the whole body thing and I liked the cliffhanger and the scenes with Siobhan.
    Better pacing, character development (Juliet and Gemma) and no bad special effects. Overall, an improvement and I'm looking forward to the next episode.
    Thanks for the review!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I want to like Ringer I really do but apart from Bridget and Nestor's character everyone else in the NY storyline are annoying and in some cases assholes.

    Seriously Andrew is so controlling if it was like that all the time no wonder Siobhan ended up being so cold towards him. Gemma is just not doing it for, neither is her cheating husband. Juliet seemed to have gained a bit of a personality by the end of the episode but she will probably go back to being a cow next week.  I want Bridget to get as far away from this self absorbed people as possible but of course that isn't going to happen.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This episode was vastly superior to the pilot.  The pacing was better although it still could use some work and I like the characters.  I'm intrigued because I don't know exactly where this show is going or who is the secret bad guy, which is unusual on TV.  However, I spent far too much time face palming over things that even suspension of belief could make plausible.  A dead body that far into rigor mortis will not bend into a chest by a non-Buffied SMG.

    ReplyDelete
  8. neither would it bleed, for that matter. 

    ReplyDelete
  9. I was a bit unsure about whether I would like Ringer or not a few weeks ago but I watched the first two episodes today and it wasn't too bad! The special effects were quite bad when there were Siobhan and Bridget in the scene but that doesn't stop me from liking it, I don't know why

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.