Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Mastodon Fringe: 'The Day We Died'; And like that, he's gone


    Enable Dark Mode!

  • What's HOT
  • Premiere Calendar
  • Ratings News
  • Movies
  • YouTube Channel
  • Submit Scoop
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Privacy Policy
Support SpoilerTV
SpoilerTV.com is now available ad-free to for all premium subscribers. Thank you for considering becoming a SpoilerTV premium member!

SpoilerTV - TV Spoilers

Fringe: 'The Day We Died'; And like that, he's gone

7 May 2011

Share on Reddit
I consider 'Fringe' to be the even nerdier little brother to 'Lost'. Both come from the same father of sorts (JJ Abrams), both are sci-fi dramas (which I think we can all agree 'Lost' ended up being), both have a very loyal fan base and both consistently find new ways to impress me. This third season, the first one to be on the air without its elder sibling, has been largely fantastic. Seeing the two universes switching back and forth has been a brilliant idea. It's given most of the cast great opportunities to play another version of their characters, a treat they all seem to have relished in. Most importantly, the emotional component to the show was strengthened this year, with some spectacular performances for all involved.

'The Day We Died', an episode that featured a bunch of characters we don't really know any more, in a world that's completely foreign to us, single-handedly undoes all of that. I was only partially invested in the first place because I assumed this was the definite future, that the events being portrayed were what actually happen 15 years down the line. But knowing that it was just a 'possible' future, that the finale we've all been looking forward to for so long turned out to be a 'What if?' episode? Not only that, but an episode that might already have been retconned out of the show the same way Peter seems to have been?(*) That makes me feel mighty uneasy, and at the same time very glad that 'Lost' never tried to pull this in the end.

*Do we know if Joshua Jackson is coming back next year? I'll say it now - I'll be giving up on 'Fringe' if he is gone - that would be a big birdie flip to all of those who embraced the emotional side of Season 3, all of which was somehow connected to Peter, be it the kidnapping, the Olivia-Peter-Fauxlivia threeway, or the Father-Son bond rebuilding. Kill off a character, sure, but don't wipe him from existence.

I suppose the biggest problem is that I actually liked most of what happened in 2026. The scene with Walternate and Peter was brilliantly tense, and the hologram trick was a really clever twist. Olivia dying was quite sad at the time, particularly because I thought it was really cool that the show had kept them together. They could have easily broken them up and had them be uncomfortable working partners, and I reckon that would have worked fine, but keeping them together (and married!) was a nice touch. I liked Astrid finally being a proper agent. Jasika Nicole often has the least exciting material to play on this show, and she seems to love playing anything different to Walter's helper in the lab. I also liked that there was a lot of material leftover to play with - 15 years of unfilled backstory, a dream for fanfiction writers (and also external media for the show, books and comics and the like).

But of course, it was all rendered moot. If Peter coming back and uniting the two universes did in fact erase the timeline as shown in the majority of this episode as intended, then... what's the point? To show how bad things can get? We didn't need to see that, we understood perfectly. If so, then why save the resolution right until the end? If the aim is to show us why the two universes have to be linked, then why spend all but four minutes of the episode in this future that doesn't matter, when we would be spending more time on the 'how to sort it' problem? The solution itself - that 'The First People' are actually just everybody 15 years from now, and that Walter is the one who sends everything back in time, and 'has' to do it because he is locked in a paradox, just seems a little wishy-washy. We also have no idea how Walter brought Peter's consciousness forward, how they managed to send the pieces back and scatter them across. We only know that they did it, and now it didn't really even happen. I don't need 'Fringe' to spell everything out for me, but this show has always prided itself in explaining the science behind the trick, even if it's pseudo-science.

And then, of course, Peter disappears completely. Now, I'm going to give the writers enough credit to assume they know exactly what Peter's purpose is now, but I hate shoehorned twists(**) and to me there's nothing less fun than a twist that comes with no hint of where we might possibly be going with it. Usually, it's fine, because a promo for the next week's episode will usually give you a hint. Here, we're left completely in the dark, with not really much to go on for next season.

**I'm annoyed about the 'twist' at the end of 'LSD', a matter than not only hasn't been resolved but hasn't even been touched upon. At no point in the three episodes that followed did Peter ask Olivia, 'Oh, that thing you said about a man killing you, what was that all about?' Again, I don't need to know everything about it. But just some hint about who that guy was would have been appreciated.

In the end I think it was ultimately a matter of pacing. No longer than half the episode should have been spent in 2026, and more time should have been given to setting up season 4 as well as properly resolving the events in 2011. Last year's finale was a proper conclusion to the Peter abduction arc, and it nicely set up the third season by showing Olivia being captured, but here, I just don't know.

I'll hopefully look back on this episode in a year's time and be more praising of it. It was still a solid hour of television. With a few tweaks here and there this could have been an amazing episode, but I was disappointed. But at least we have Fringe Season 4 to look forward to, and this finale has certainly not stopped me from being excited (and thankful) about that.

As a side note, I've not been posting on SpoilerTV during 2011 yet, and frankly, I've missed it. I have a full time course and a job as well as lots of work to do at home and so it's kind of taken a back seat. But I've got a bit more free time right now and as the shows are all coming to an end my aim is to try and do season finale reviews for the ones I watch. I'll certainly be covering 'Breaking Bad' in July, as I'll have plenty more time for it, but for now, it's nice to be back. I missed you all!

What did everybody else think?

20 comments:

  1. [SPOILER]

    "@
    CoryAllenHurst

    #FringelLiveTweet
    Let's just say Josh has a contract for season 4." via @
    JWFringe

    ReplyDelete
  2. Joseph, come over to the Fringe TWOP forum http://forums.televisionwithoutpity.com/index.php?showforum=1100, see what some of Fringe's most loyal fans are saying about the finale and join the discussion. I will post a link to your review from there.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I certainly will, bagert. Think I used to be a member of TWOP a while ago, but lord knows what my username is.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "We also have no idea how Walter brought Peter's consciousness forward,
    how they managed to send the pieces back and scatter them across."





    Yes we do. Faraday Cage remember ? Alternate Brandon was putting it on the Machine on the other side =).





    And the pieces...well. Either Future Walter sent them one by one or he
    sent the Machine and the gravity in the wormhole scattered the Machine.

    ReplyDelete
  5. no. peter existed and did destroy the other universe, but when walternate started destroying



    there universe and killed olivia, walter started thinking and realized that he made the machine,



    and sent it to the past via the current time vortex in central park. now no matter how many times



    he tries to fix this it wont change anything because he already did it, but if they found a way to



    incorporate the ability ---to send peters consciousness forward into the future--- into the machine,



    peter will see the damage done by destroying the other universe, and will not make the choice,



    he will not destroy the other universe, instead he bridged a gap between two universes. now this



    action messed up the whole "equation" so to speak, and peter became irrelevant in the time line,



    so he simply ceased to exist,. he did not "die" he just vanished from the whole timeline, no one



    remebered him. and no one forgot him. just as the observer said, he served his purpose.



    now what i written above is my personal understanding of what happened,



    but what i dont understand is that walter messed up the whole universe to save peter, now that



    peter vanished from the time line, what reason did walter have to travel to the alternate universe?



    does that mean his peter never died if the alternate peter( our peter ) never existed? i guess we



    will have to wait for season 4 to find out for sure.
    Taken from: SpoilerTV http://www.spoilertv.com/2011/05/poll-what-did-you-think-of-fringe-day.html#ixzz1Lfwg8Qr9

    ReplyDelete
  6. I saw an interview on a site...and it said something about the fact that walter and bell were trying to cross over to the other universe,even before the Peter died,or got sick...so we can assume that they just succeeded in crossing over and while they were over there,they did something that messed up the balance between both universes...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well, there were some issues with the episode, especially with pacing (which is the norm for Fringe episodes these days, and there's nothing really wrong with it), but I think I'm beginning to understand why Peter disappeared and why he may or may not return in full form. Essentially, we're not looking at a BSG-like situation where Kara Thrace vanishes off the face of the Earth after completing her destiny, we're looking at full-blown course correction.

    Walter destroyed the fabrication of the universe by crossing over, taking Peter, and curing him of his disease. From the moment he crosses over, he creates an inconsistency in both timelines. Just imagine Doc Brown on a chalkboard drawing up a corrupted timeline, but in this case, we're looking at two different corrupted timelines, two corrupted space time continuum. Following these events, both universes slowly begin to fall apart, and the only thing that can possibly repair what damage has been done is to unite what's left of the Red and Blue universes (In 2011, when the holes begin to appear on our side), otherwise, those on the "Red" side, would have been completely destroyed, and those who wouldn't have been (Walter, the end of dayers, etc), would cross over themselves, their universe destroyed, and would try to destroy our side as well.

    So now we essentially have three timelines. One normal, one corrupted, and a third, but second corrupted timeline. This timeline was created upon the return of Peter from the flashfowards that he experienced whilst within the machine, he now had the knowledge that he must re-unite the universes in order to save everyone and everything, otherwise the grim future experienced in 2026, would slowly become a reality.

    My theory is, that the Red universe (in this second corrupt timeline), is still very much alive. Whether the entire universe was merged into ours, or just the room which the machine was housed, it doesn't matter. Either way, it's still alive. The reason why Peter dissipated into thin air, was because he doesn't belong in either universe, like the Observers. The Observers are a separate case, but Peter originally belonged on the "Red" side, but from the moment that Walter cured him and brought him over to "Our" side, he became sort of a paradox. He didn't belong, and as long as he was present on either side, or our side, the tears on both sides would augment and worsen. So now that he doesn't exist to either universes (or just ours for now, we don't know about the Reds), the inconsistency has been temporarily repaired, and both sides can now put some of their more major disagreements aside in order to repair what damage has been done. Just think about it: Both Olivia's no longer have conflicting feelings for one man, and both Walters no longer have that present grudge against each other (not 100% concrete, but it may just be.)

    I think that Peter exists somewhere, but the logistics of this existence are so beyond anyone's head right now that it's just not worth diving into a plethora of theories. Word has it that he's set to return next season, and I certainly hope so -- but how he returns and in what form, is completely unknown. We have as little information on his return as we have for William Bell's. We think/know that both of them are dead and no longer present in either universes, but rumor has it that the both of them will be coming back. So the last thing you want to do is to start screaming out bloody murder at the writers and the creators of the show, because they have something up their sleeves, and it's bound to be good. It may not have been the finale that "Over There, Pt. 2" was, but there's plenty of time for a groundbreaking finale in the future seasons of this show. Besides, last week's finale was more of a shocker than just about any show in the past few years, with the exception of Dexter's 4th season finale, which was a shocker in it's own very unique and disturbing way.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I couldn't agree more.

    And while I understand why certain aspects of this plot line can be frustrating for some people (me included), I personally love a show that makes one think for days or more afterwards.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I disagree with this article in almost it's entirety (although if J.J. doesn't come back I will be sorely disappointed and will not be watching as intently next season) I think that a little bit of faith is needed, the consequences of coming back Im sure will be explored and actually Im absolutely relieved, I'm not done with Jean and the inhabitants of the universe yet and think more excitement can be had from seeing the two universes working together. I look forward to seeing a fringe event where both Olivias kick ass. I think it was also important to show how bad it was and show Peter what the wrong choice was especially if he chose a universe. I think not seeing that wouldn't have paid off the decision that we have been waiting for and been expecting all season.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm excited for S4, but this episode disappointed me A LOT.

    ReplyDelete
  11. numbersarebad8 May 2011 at 08:18

    If Peter never existed, what happens to his son?

    ReplyDelete
  12. thats interesting, now that i think about it, walter told walternate that what he did was an accident..its as if walter was experimenting and accidentally tore holes in walternates universe,

    ReplyDelete
  13. THanks for ruining the end of the episode in your title....i do appreciate ruined endings......

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think I know how Peter comes back: http://potthead.livejournal.com/772251.html


    Theory contains spoilers up to 3x22, obviously.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Great short review :) I wish I could keep my Supernatural recaps that short! :) Anyway I just watched the episode and was BLOWN AWAY. I think the flash forward was partially cause it was cool and something Fringe hadn't done before, and also as a kind of false lead - we knew someone would be dying in the finale, and seeing Peter and everyone there we could think oh great, they're all safe. Then Olivia died and it was like WHOA, they just killed off the main character (despite the fact that she's supposed to be killed off by that dream guy... kind of bad consistency, and as you said, they haven't even brought that up since 'LSD'). But THEN it's a twist and it's actually Peter who disappears! I thought that wasn't so much retconning as pretty brilliant storytelling.


    At the same time I'm with you, I won't be able to enjoy the show if Peter (and Joshua Jackson) won't be back, that would be ridiculous. But I did hear that he's coming back, so if that's true, I'm happy. :)

    ReplyDelete
  16. Charles, I thought that was fairly ambiguous and was a reference to The Usual Suspects. Also, this is SpoilerTV, and the episode aired on Friday. Sorry if you were spoiled, but I advise you do what I do - stay off SpoilerTV until you've seen the episode!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Believe me, Selina - I wish it was easy to keep them like this. First drafts usually clock in at several thousand words.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Oh! Yes! Thank you for that. The scattering of the pieces is still guesswork but the conciousness explanation does make some sense.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I agree partly with Charles Bitton (but without the sarcasm). It wasn't a huge spoiler because it was abstract, but i think i'd still appreciate the spoilers not being in the titles too, if possible. :) In this case it did give away a small edge of the surprise for me.

    The thing is, i watch tons of shows and check spoilertv for all of them, so staying off spoilertv until i watch every ep or every finale of every show basically means i can't read the site anymore, lol. It's great to have no spoilers in titles, and then i can pick and choose when i read big or small spoilers or whatever. :)

    ReplyDelete

NOTE: Name-calling, personal attacks, spamming, excessive self-promotion, condescending pomposity, general assiness, racism, sexism, any-other-ism, homophobia, acrophobia, and destructive (versus constructive) criticism will get you BANNED from the party.